Recreating the US/* time zone situation (rachelbythebay.com)

78 points by move-on-by 16 hours ago

equinoxnemesis 5 hours ago

Context on "THE ONE", a phrase used in this post, because it wasn't obvious to me initially.

https://rachelbythebay.com/w/2018/04/28/meta/

flomo 2 hours ago

Thanks, I missed it.

(I should note that in my crowd, references to this movie are always super-negative. "The One" gets damned to hell to eternally fight, but never win his battle.)

fweimer 42 minutes ago

The core issue is that tzdata files do not contain the time zone identifier. If you are unlucky in /etc/localtime is not a symbolic link, you have to scan the files in /usr/share/zoneinfo to find a match. PostgreSQL prefers shorter names: https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit...

That's why "US" wins over "America".

p_ing 16 hours ago

Read the previous blog post [0] -- this one is disjointed without it. I dislike TZ selectors that use locations (cities, countries, etc.). Let PDT be PDT(-8) and PST be PST(-7). Why do I need to choose Cupertino, CA (or LA in the blog post example) -- locations over 1k miles away from me? And while I certainly understand where Cupertino is and how it relates to my TZ, what if someone else doesn't? Cupertino isn't a major population center.

Anyway, poor UX. But of course TZ names could also be argued as poor UX. What if you just did PST/PDT as Los Angeles, CA; Oregon, OR, and Seattle, WA all on separate line items? Sure, it's duplicate data but a backend system (Postgres config files, say) should only store the value of the TZ, i.e. -7 / -8. At least a user could recognize 'oh, I drive to xyz major city occasionally, that's the choice I want'.

To keep ranting, I checked macOS 15 TZ selector for PDT/PST. The selector itself is labeled "Closest city". It has numerous locations in California, a few in Nevada, and a couple in Mexico. No cities in Oregon, Washington, or Idaho (and Hyder, AK... neat [1]).

Closest is a stretch, like I said, over 1K miles from LA. But why several California cities, including minor ones like Oceanside (~175K people), but nothing in Oregon (Eugene, also 175K), Portland (652K), or Washington - Tacoma (220K), Seattle (740K). Note I did not look for the smallest city in the macOS CA list.

It's weird to me. Maybe it's because Oregon == Intel and Washington == Microsoft. ;-)

[0] https://rachelbythebay.com/w/2025/09/11/debtz/

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Time_Zone#United_State...

Aloisius 4 hours ago

> Anyway, poor UX. But of course TZ names could also be argued as poor UX. What if you just did PST/PDT as Los Angeles, CA; Oregon, OR, and Seattle, WA all on separate line items? Sure, it's duplicate data but a backend system (Postgres config files, say) should only store the value of the TZ, i.e. -7 / -8.

Because that doesn't tell you when the timezone changes. Two locales can share timezones but start or end daylight savings time at different times.

For instance, Cuba and Florida are both -4 / -5, but Cuba starts and ends daylight savings time 2 hours and 1 hour, respectively, before Florida.

Then there's the fact that locales, once in a while, will change what timezone they're in (like Samoa in 2011) or stop/start observing daylight savings time. Having the timezone set to a place largely solves this problem.

jjmarr 34 minutes ago

> Anyway, poor UX. But of course TZ names could also be argued as poor UX. What if you just did PST/PDT as Los Angeles, CA; Oregon, OR, and Seattle, WA all on separate line items?

If your application can access the current location you don't need to expose a TZ selector to the user. You can figure out what time zone database sector you're in automatically.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tz_database_time_zones...

> Sure, it's duplicate data but a backend system (Postgres config files, say) should only store the value of the TZ, i.e. -7 / -8.

Your backend needs to store location because places can switch time zones. The reason for the seemingly arbitrary list of cities is they each define a region where clocks have been synchronized since 1970.

jolmg 7 hours ago

> Let PDT be PDT(-8) and PST be PST(-7). Why do I need to choose Cupertino, CA (or LA in the blog post example)

Whether daylight savings time is being used at a given location at a given time of year is a matter of government policy. The city-based timezone selectors should handle that automatically based on the jurisdiction you choose.

> Sure, it's duplicate data but a backend system (Postgres config files, say) should only store the value of the TZ, i.e. -7 / -8.

Then the time may be wrong for half the year depending on where you are.

themafia 5 hours ago

> The city-based timezone selectors

There's no America/Salt_Lake_City you're recommended to use America/Boise instead. The people in Salt Lake City are about as far away from Boise as you can get and Salt Lake City is more easily recognized as a landmark then Boise. The process of choosing which cities should be landmark cities comes across as faulty and uninformed.

Aloisius 3 hours ago

jolmg 4 hours ago

jen20 5 hours ago

bbanyc 7 hours ago

You can't just go by time zone names because there are weird exceptions, like most of Arizona not doing DST. Then there's Indiana, which didn't do DST until 20 years ago, and there are some counties that switched time zones when the DST law took effect... if you're in one of those counties will you just accept old timestamps being an hour off? Granted, this gradually becomes less of an issue the further we get from the change. But nothing guarantees that there won't be further changes in the future.

And that's just the US, there's almost 200 other countries each with their own laws.

Terr_ 7 hours ago

A bit of an edge case, but there's also the problem that the time zone you pick today might not be the time zone you have tomorrow: The jurisdiction you're in can change what their clocks use on an institutional whim.

It's very unlikely, but tomorrow some state or major city in PST could decide to add 15 minutes to all their wall clocks. Should your computer's clock change? That depends on what you're using it for...

andrewinardeer 7 hours ago

Even abbreviations have issues. PST (UTC+8) is also Philippine Standard Time. EST could mean Eastern Standard Time in Australia, granted that nowadays is AEST.

Timezones are such a headache. Obviously even UTC for a location varies depending on the time of year.

Even the International Space Station shifted timezones from Houston time to UTC+0.

Curiosity and Perseverance's clocks are UTC but operations run on LMST (local mean solar time) Gale Crater and LMST Jezero Crater- their landing locations. That point is moot until humans start spinning up VMs on Mars which they will one day.

laurencerowe 3 hours ago

> Obviously even UTC for a location varies depending on the time of year.

The offset from UTC for a location varies depending on time of year but UTC definitionally has a zero offset throughout the year.

If you’re in the Europe/London time zone your time is equal to GMT/UTC (offset zero) for half the year and BST (offset +1) for the other half.

In other words we have two different types here: Timezones based on location where the UTC offset varies, and the UTC offset itself (like +0100/BST or +0000/GMT/Z.)

skissane 7 hours ago

> Let PDT be PDT(-8) and PST be PST(-7)

The problem is both the US and Australia have “EST/EDT” - the Australian version sometimes has an A stuck on the front to disambiguate it from the US timezone, but that isn’t always done (especially given some systems insist timezone abbreviations can be max 3 characters). And the problem with disambiguating on the basis of UTC offsets is you’d be surprised by how many people have no clue what any of them are. But “Americas” vs “Australia”, they’ll get that right

MBCook 5 hours ago

I suspect a large number of users might choose PST if in California, when they really mean PST/PDT. Or perhaps in the summer they would semi-correctly choose PDT.

Choosing a large city you know shares your time zone does make things a bit more “human“.

lmz 5 hours ago

Offset alone is not enough because different TZ names also point to different DST schedules (current and historic) and past changes.

You can look at the tz data files to see what that looks like.

Bratmon 5 hours ago

I'm curious as to what people in Phoenix would select as their timezone under your proposed solution?

simonw 3 hours ago

My prize for worst time zone UI still goes to Google calendar.

If you want to create an event in a different time zone from your default the select picker it gives you is utterly incomprehensible.

I can't even find the time zone for New York/US eastern in it!

Screenshot here: https://static.simonwillison.net/static/2024/google-calendar...

arccy 5 minutes ago

isn't it at GMT-4 Eastern Time - New York?

lstodd 7 hours ago

if one is serious, one just chooses UTC.

one can play with timezones all they want, but in the end it's a presentation issue.

Terr_ 5 hours ago

> in the end it's a presentation issue.

Whoah there, no, that's a huge pitfall of sharpened spikes as soon as you deal with events in the future.

If someone proposes an after-work party for "5:30 PM" at the Latverian office in Latverian time, that's not a fixed offset of seconds from now, it's actually a set of triggering conditions.

We can make a decent guess about when those conditions will be satisfied, but don't actually know until it finally happens. At any moment, the administration of Dr. Doom could arbitrarily change the country's clocks. They might skip over that entire hour, or the hour might repeat on that day, or the entire country might cease to exist.

Making a prediction in UTC and storing just that is a very bad idea, because you lost all the original context you need to recalculate a better prediction as things change. Storing the "5PM in Latverian" is how we keep that context.

adrian_b 2 hours ago

anonymars 5 hours ago

UTC helps store specific moments in time. Notably it does not solve for "dates" nor recurrence. Many of my hairs have been lost to third parties thinking they've created viable systems simply because they use UTC.

adrian_b an hour ago

Terr_ 4 hours ago

p_ing 6 hours ago

Running UTC as a clock on an end user workstation is about the dumbest thing you can do (unless they reside in UTC).

teo_zero an hour ago

adrian_b an hour ago

lstodd 6 hours ago

izacus 2 hours ago

somat 6 hours ago

Doing this at the system level was one of the better ideas to come out of unix.

tomhow 7 hours ago

Discussion about previous article in series:

Debian 13, Postgres, and the US time zones - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45218111 - Sept 2025 (142 comments)

quuxplusone 7 hours ago

Title should involve "US/*", not just "US".

themafia 5 hours ago

> I got to wondering... why did I pick "US/Pacific", anyway?

That's what the authority that defines the zone calls it. Using any other name is adding a useless layer of abstraction.

bouke 2 hours ago

It is not, that’s the whole point of the blog post this one follows up on.