What your Bluetooth devices reveal (blog.dmcc.io)
241 points by ssgodderidge 8 hours ago
trashb 6 hours ago
> We’ve normalised the idea that Bluetooth is always on. Phones, laptops, smartwatches, headphones, cars, and even medical devices constantly broadcast their presence. The standard response to privacy concerns is usually “nothing to hide, nothing to fear.”
I guess anything you send out can be used to profile you.
Some of my friends live on a farm near a semi busy road, however far enough from other farms to not be able to receive their wifi. They showed me their router logging all the wifi accesspoints that appear/disappear. There where A LOT of access points named "Audi", "BMW", "Tesla" etc. similar to those devices leaking bluetooth data. We had a discussion that it would be easy to determine who was passing by at what times due to these especially when you can "de-anonymize" the data for example link it to a numberplate.
I believe shopping malls often use such signals (wifi, bluetooth) to track what your travel pattern through the mall is. They know what section of the store you spend most of your time in and what storefronts you stall at.
luma an hour ago
You can do this for much cheaper - all four of your tires are broadcasting a unique ID to report tire pressure, the radio to pick it up is cheap (because cars), and TPMS has no facility to randomize or otherwise secure this.
Gigachad an hour ago
It’s actually even easier, your car has a plate on the front with a unique ID that a camera scans, often to automatically track your park time for ticketing.
I can’t really care about obscure Bluetooth tracking when every business has CCTV doing facial recognition.
spockz an hour ago
Not all cars have active TPMS. my Volvo xc90 had them but in later models they switched back to passive ones. So it is not even a given for higher end models.
jorvi an hour ago
> I believe shopping malls often use such signals (wifi, bluetooth) to track what your travel pattern through the mall is. They know what section of the store you spend most of your time in and what storefronts you stall at
In the EU this is forbidden unless they explicitly ask your permission. They can still gather aggregate stats but they cannot build a profile on you.
officeplant 6 hours ago
>There where A LOT of access points named "Audi", "BMW", "Tesla" etc.
That's one of the funniest things about wardriving with Wigle on your phone. I can often see the SSID of "Jennifer's Equinox", "Jacks Suburban" right after I get cut off by someone in said vehicle. The vast majority of car bluetooth/wifi I see tends to have varying amounts of identifying information. It's almost as bad as the fact that apple still defaults to Jacks iPhone/iPad etc with no option to rename the device until you've finished setting it up.
Companies are not out to protect us with default settings and the majority of users need to wake up to this fact.
saghm 4 hours ago
This might just be me being uninformed as someone who doesn't drive but how are you seeing what wifi networks are available so quickly right after being cut off? My very naive instinct is that looking at your phone or opening up a menu with the available wifi networks on your car's display seems like it would require a noticeable decrease in attention to the road, so I'd almost expect an uptick in being cut off from other people who are annoyed with your driving.
officeplant 4 hours ago
reactordev 3 hours ago
What would be next level wardriving would be to break into their Bluetooth and have a conversation about their driving habits.
It can be done, relatively easily.
Fnoord 4 hours ago
Don't worry about Tesla's being tracked. Via Bluetooth this has existed for at least 7 years [1] (was mentioned on HN as well). Tesla know (also for 7 years), Musk doesn't care 'since license plates can also be tracked'.
I used it in train stations, and get hits when passing highways via train or bus. Esp. fun if you stand still due to traffic lights or traffic jam, since you can try to get a visual.
The only lesson to be learned here is that it allowed one to learn in 2019 Musk is overrated. But you can also learn that lesson from the book The PayPal Wars which predates this by 15 years.
> I believe shopping malls often use such signals (wifi, bluetooth) to track what your travel pattern through the mall is. They know what section of the store you spend most of your time in and what storefronts you stall at.
Not allowed in EU.
xaldir an hour ago
> Not allowed in EU.
I'm surprised, I know for a fact that some stores definitely have the ability to do that on their hardware.
tskulbru 4 hours ago
> I believe shopping malls often use such signals (wifi, bluetooth) to track what your travel pattern through the mall is. They know what section of the store you spend most of your time in and what storefronts you stall at.
Yes, I remember Cisco had a product like this all the way back in 2011. They could pinpoint a customer to an exact position inside a store using triangulation, they would know which shelf you spent time in front of etc. In the 15 years since then, I expect the technology is much scarier and intrusive.
nofunsir 2 hours ago
iBeacon. They know what shelf you're standing in front of. What products you touch and read.
Ever been in an Apple store? Look up. In the dark voids between the edge-to-edge backlit ceiling. There are secrets there. Watching you.
reaperducer an hour ago
jasonfrost 5 hours ago
There's an Android app that can find devices, make profiles, and you can track location for as long as they're connected. So you can profile passerbys and even get notified when the profile passes through again. I forgot what is was called
RunningDroid 2 hours ago
Are you thinking of BLE Radar?
dylan604 3 hours ago
Years ago when BT beacons were newish, I was talking to an AdTechBro that wanted to create the ability from Minority Report where the kiosk recognizes a user, not by eye scans but by recognizing mobile device, so they could offer a personalized whatever. The creepiness wasn't something they eased into. It was pretty much instant.
scottlamb 3 hours ago
> We had a discussion that it would be easy to determine who was passing by at what times due to these especially when you can "de-anonymize" the data for example link it to a numberplate.
You could also read the numberplate directly with OpenALPR. It can be finicky to set up a camera to do this reliably in all conditions (particularly at night and high speed) but once done you could detect any car passing, not just ones with wifi access points.
When the law requires us to have numberplates, I think this just has to be considered public information for anyone who is nearby or can leave a camera nearby. It's not ideal to leak it in additional forms that might be easier for people to grab (say, with an ESP32), but it's a matter of degree rather than of kind.
But yeah, I'm with you on some of these others, particularly the medical devices. That's not great.
AlotOfReading 2 hours ago
There's a difference between public and Public. I go outside with my face visible and I don't mind if my neighbors see me. I do mind if my neighbors stand outside my door with a notepad sketching faces every time they see me or anyone else, especially if they're selling the data. Systematic tracking that isn't subject to the constraints of human memory and apathy fundamentally changes the equation.
scottlamb a minute ago
thedrexster an hour ago
chasil 2 hours ago
The GrapheneOS variant of Android will disable both Bluetooth and WiFi after a set period of inactivity.
There is also a Bluetooth shutoff app on F-Droid.
https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.mystro256.autooffbluetoo...
I have also put an Airtag clone in my car (Loshall in iOS mode). That is probably leaking my arrival times. My water meter is also now bluetooth.
SoftTalker 5 hours ago
I disable bluetooth on my phone, though periodically I find that it's back on.
Edit: iOS
craftkiller 5 hours ago
I have the opposite experience: GrapheneOS has an option to automatically turn your bluetooth off after a configurable period of not being used. So when I need to use bluetooth, I turn it on like normal. Then, without thinking about it, it automatically turns off. The end result is my bluetooth is only ever on for a couple hours each month when I'm making phone calls.
rationalist 2 hours ago
littlecorner 3 hours ago
dylan604 3 hours ago
I miss wired headphones for this purpose. It's the only reason I even have BT enabled.
officeplant 4 hours ago
With iOS the easiest way to make sure it off and stays off is to build a shortcut to cut off wifi/bluetooth. Otherwise it's typically off until you get geolocated as being back home/work and wifi comes back on.
I have a "store mode" button that just kills wifi/bt that I hit before I go into any store.
mcosta an hour ago
silon42 4 hours ago
Android now has an option to enable it every day.. (I have it disabled).
autoexec 5 hours ago
> I believe shopping malls often use such signals (wifi, bluetooth) to track what your travel pattern through the mall is.
Many places do this. The department stores in the mall, target, even grocery stores do it.
pixl97 6 hours ago
> even medical devices constantly broadcast their presence
I mean yes, said medical devices are a whole lot less useful to me if they are not transmitting data. For some of this stuff you can't have your cake and eat it too.
0x1ch 5 hours ago
I was wardriving my neighborhood and realized my elderly neighbor's CPAP machine is broadcasting some type of BT signal 24/7. I imagine it's transmitting some important stats, but it did make me have a 2nd thought about medical devices being IoT or BT enabled.
kccqzy 4 hours ago
reaperducer an hour ago
dietr1ch 5 hours ago
What forces devices to constantly stream data? You can batch updates and probably save power thanks to it.
kccqzy 4 hours ago
xanrah 6 hours ago
There’s a middle ground here. There is no technical reason a pacemaker constantly broadcasts itself - there is ways to allow communication to such devices without yelling your name all the time. And there is definitely no reason for such a name to be a unique identifier.
pixl97 5 hours ago
fennec-posix a minute ago
Emit at your own peril
TheSilva 7 hours ago
Tangential, sort of: in the early days of mobile phones for the masses, when there was no WiFi/3G in the underground, I will often enable Bluetooth in my phone, look for nearby devices and try to match names and looks.
That was before everyone had their "John's IPhone" or "Samsung A55" boring names everywhere and some of us cared to personalise our device's name.
Anyone else played this game?
herghost 4 hours ago
hmmmmm...
2006, sat in a job interview. Interviewer says he'll Bluetooth over a file to me - what's by phone's name?
2006, the year that Tool's 10,000 Days had been released, which I was enjoying and, being a bit of an Edge Lord, I'd named my device after a lyric from Vicarious - which, IIRC fit perfectly into the name space and made me very happy:
> ILikeToWatchThingsDie
Excellent. Still got the job though!
jjkaczor 5 hours ago
Hah, I change my device name and wifi hotspot all the time...
"[Agency-acronym] Surveillance Van #43/44/etc.."
oarla 6 hours ago
Yeah, but it stopped pretty soon stores figured out that they could flood you with advertisements over Bluetooth. In some places it was bad enough that I had to turn off Bluetooth.
patja 5 hours ago
How did this play out? Were the ads from an app from the store that you had installed? Or did they spam you over SMS because they associated your bluetooth info with an account you have with the store, or contact info they bought from a third party?
dylan604 3 hours ago
tonetegeatinst 7 hours ago
Yep 100% did the same.
It was interesting to see what people named stuff as even back then I figured you could use that metadata for tracking devices...but even more interesting was looking at the Mac address to see the manufacturer and try and find some rare or cool device.
styfle 5 hours ago
Did you ever try to communicate with them?
mytailorisrich 7 hours ago
I do the reverse. I set my wifi hotspot or bluetooth to "MetPoliceUnit355" and I look for people making faces or looking around.
nine_k 4 hours ago
This is not very different from collecting visual cues. You can notice a delivery van arriving. You can see the driver's face, same with passers-by. The biggest difference is that a camera needs to be more conspicuous, while a BT receiver can be invisible and undetectable. Much cheaper, too.
bigbuppo an hour ago
I can assure you this has been talked about and is known and it's why you still find a headset port on devices handed out to government officials, though most of them ignore the advice to not use bluetooth.
gruez 6 hours ago
Bluetooth desperately needs mac randomization. Wifi mac randomization is welcome, but it doesn't do much when many (most?) people have bluetooth accessories broadcasting a persistent identifier whenever they're on.
avidiax 4 hours ago
> Bluetooth desperately needs mac randomization.
Bluetooth already has a well developed MAC randomization scheme.
Lookup "resolvable private address". The short of it is, your phone can find your headphones or vice-versa, despite one or both having random addresses. The addresses can be regenerated or rotate at an interval (say 15 minutes). The first part of the address is a nonce (pRand), and the rest of the address is a 24-bit hash of pRand with an identity resolving key (IRK). So the other party just listens passively for addresses, and sees if any of them happen to have the right hash.
I don't think this is as airtight as people think it is. Certainly, if you are following somebody and one address disappears right as another appears (rotation), it's quite easy to infer the new/old addresses belong to one device. I tried briefly to convince the Android developers to synchronize that rotation globally.
You can also probably infer that if you see a pair of random MACs arrive, and they have a certain pattern of timing and payload size, you can say with some certainty that they are particular devices, say an iPhone and an Apple Watch. But that requires sophisticated equipment since most Bluetooth LE communication is over a non-cryptographic frequency hopping arrangement.
Lastly, radio fingerprinting is widely known in academia, but requires special equipment.
neilalexander 5 hours ago
Random Bluetooth MACs are already possible. iOS devices have been doing it for years alongside the random Wi-Fi MACs.
dalemhurley an hour ago
Ring: thank you for the idea, "Introducing Ring Face-Off, face masks covering faces during a break-in is no an issue for Ring, we will track the thieves until they reveal their face to our Ring network."
clarabennett26 4 hours ago
The part about passively detecting delivery driver patterns from a home office is wild. I knew BLE was chatty but being able to correlate device pairs (phone + watch) to build movement profiles with just a Pi is genuinely unsettling. Makes me want to audit which of my devices are broadcasting when they don't need to be.
bpoyner 5 hours ago
"We agreed on a 150-day disclosure window". Isn't that longer than Google Project Zero gives to release fixes?
jeena 6 hours ago
About 10 years ago i had HomeAssistant running and thacking my bluetooth devices. It does so per default by jus memorizing a mac adress an recording when it's visible and when not. No need for pairing or anythung. It also stores the custom name if available.
Anyway, the default dashboard also automatically generated a view when my neighbours "Katie's iPhone' was at home and when not, until I actively deleted it and the data it stored.
avel 6 hours ago
Similar story - "Home assistant picked up my neighbours Bluetooth toothbrush and now I can see when they brush their teeth"
https://www.reddit.com/r/homeassistant/comments/1306pcw/home...
ifh-hn 4 hours ago
Wonder what the difference is between this and: https://github.com/ArgeliusLabs/Chasing-Your-Tail-NG
RamRodification 2 hours ago
That one doesn't seem to do bluetooth at all, I think?
cadamsdotcom 4 hours ago
This could be used for a truly eye-opening art installation: a screen that as you walk by it, tells you when you were last there..
Even wilder would be to buy data on you in real time and display that.
supertrope 3 hours ago
The Hollywood movie Minority Report has a scene where an advertising display personalizes the ad by your name. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bXJ_obaiYQ
f0r3st an hour ago
you said " blocking ads network-wide with AdGuard". It's better to block it with a Pihole.
rsync 4 hours ago
The project describes - and shows - a web interface.
Is there a simple CLI interface that can be redirected or pipelined into other tools ?
kccqzy 3 hours ago
The article says the data is in a SQLite database.
rsync 3 hours ago
Yes I see that and I wonder if the project includes a CLI tool.
jjbiotech 7 hours ago
I suspect the e-scooters left around town (Lime, Bird, etc) are massive Bluetooth / LoRa dragnets. You pay them to increase coverage or visibility to social hot spots.
hammock 6 hours ago
Wow e-scooter wardriving is something I hadn’t thought of. Could be happening somewhere
catsquirrel28 2 hours ago
> This isn’t about paranoia. It’s about understanding the trade-offs
> Bluetooth mesh networks—no internet required, no servers, no phone numbers
LLM slop. Both the article and the Python script
kevincloudsec 5 hours ago
ran something similar on a home network once and was surprised how many of my neighbors' devices showed up with full manufacturer names and model numbers. you don't even need to try hard.
0xdeadbeefbabe 2 hours ago
Wait doesn't BLE randomize the UUIDs?
webdoodle 6 hours ago
Doesn't HackRF with Cha0s do something similar?
HNisCIS 4 hours ago
And kismet
ck2 3 hours ago
Has anyone ever studied what happens with Bluetooth contention where thousands of people are gathered in a small space?
Like a marathon mass-start with 10,000 sometimes 20,000 or more people
How does bluetooth handle that? Or it doesn't?
username_here 2 hours ago
In my experience, just fine. I recently ran a large (~30k) marathon and my AirPods and watch never glitched once, streaming the whole time including in the packed start corrals. I had the same thought about RF contention, but Bluetooth didn't seem to care.
supertrope 3 hours ago
Even licensed wireless stops functioning. All circuits are busy.
zoklet-enjoyer 7 hours ago
I read an article in 2012 about the feds (DHS?) placing Bluetooth enabled devices along I5 in Seattle. They were able to make profiles of people based on what Bluetooth devices they had in their cars. Is anyone familiar with this? I've periodically tried to Google it and can't find anything about it
Spooky23 4 hours ago
Possible, but they buy data from the carriers with similar profile possibilities. The DEA operates long standing and pervasive surveillance in “drug corridors” like I-95 from Maine to Miami. They do things like LPR and grabbing passenger pictures.
If Bluetooth is used, it may be a way to get a count of passengers or if the passengers change. I know based on newspaper accounts that they are particularly interested in cars that stop in Philly or Baltimore.
This stuff is frequently used against cops too so they may use the tech in similar ways. If you’re someone worried about getting raided, spotting a large number of new signals at the front door is an early warning potentially.
coldbrewed 5 hours ago
parpfish 7 hours ago
I remember an art exhibit by an online privacy activist made where it’d ping people’s phones to get a list of “known WiFi networks” and then display them on a screen in a room.
Each person would get a unique fingerprint of named network locations
post_break 6 hours ago
I believe Houston used bluetooth to measure congestion on 45.