Passengers who refuse to use headphones can now be kicked off United flights (cnn.com)
148 points by edward 2 hours ago
pjmlp an hour ago
Is this really a thing?!? Blasting the others with unwanted noise.
I never been in a flight, or train across Europe where passengers showed just lack of respect for the others.
The only ones pumping anything loud, on trains or busses, usually get quickly pointed down by other passengers, personal or security.
Ah, and then there are the rebellious kids or gangs, as the other exception, which usually don't take flights anyway.
NikolaNovak an hour ago
I am astonished how many people now use speakerphone as their default interaction. On subway, go train, in grocery stores, on the streets, sometimes even in the office, they blast their conversations with zero care.
And so yes, I've definitely seen and experienced people watching inane tiktoks on speaker in subway or bus or airplane. It's the epitome of complete lack of empathy or self awareness to me, but I guess that's the way culture is going.
lostlogin an hour ago
Phone makers deleted the speaker is the ‘courage’ I want.
fhdkweig 19 minutes ago
balderdash 40 minutes ago
It is - there are three groups of people that do this generally the completely self absorbed, people from places where it’s culturally acceptable, and people that like the feeling of empowerment that comes from a inconveniencing others (the same people that will walk out into traffic with no light / crosswalk)
callamdelaney 37 minutes ago
How is walking over a road without a light inconveniencing anyone? I’ll cross the road when it’s clear. I don’t blast music in public places though.
JumpCrisscross 34 minutes ago
Spooky23 22 minutes ago
schrodinger 18 minutes ago
mikkupikku an hour ago
In America, a small number of people derive pleasure from being disruptive to everybody, and blasting music on public transit with captive audiences is a very "traditional" way of fucking with people and expressing your broad contempt for their society. I'd estimate that maybe one in five times you get on a city bus in America, you'll encounter somebody like this.
Very rarely does anybody call them out or otherwise try to reign it in, because you're as likely as not to be physically attacked and in America, the odds of bystanders coming to your rescue are... Not zero, but not great.
andy99 an hour ago
Pretty sure on planes this is more ignorance than malice. It’s self absorbed people that are too selfish to consider someone else might not want to hear what they’re watching, rather than some deliberate anti society thing.
Regardless, no punishment is too harsh, this should be considered the equivalent of lighting up a cigarette on a plane.
sowbug an hour ago
e40 an hour ago
hallole an hour ago
I don't think I'd have the wherewithal to jump in and do something if I were a bystander. I'm not the sort to throw hands, I don't carry, and these disruptive types are already a bit feral.
I'm not sure it's contempt they're expressing, or if they're expressing anything at all. There really are people who enjoy and defend it, too; "it's just a guy playing music, mind your own business." Truly alien.
AnimalMuppet an hour ago
standardUser an hour ago
wanderingstan an hour ago
My go-to technique has been to offer the offender a pair of headphones, saying something to insinuate that they must forgotten theirs or be too poor to afford them. Most of the time they say “oh I have headphones!” and then realize that they’ve outed themselves. (I stockpile the free headphones from gyms or airplanes, or get the $2 ones from AliExpress)
oidar 13 minutes ago
CalRobert an hour ago
Happens elsewhere too. Can be an issue in Dutch trains
LaurensBER an hour ago
20%? That's a bit insane. This does happen in Europe but is heavily looked down up on and usually quickly corrected.
On the other hand I did get a chewing out from an older guy for having a conversation with friends on a train once, so some people take it perhaps a bit too serious.
keiferski an hour ago
baal80spam 14 minutes ago
I can guarantee you that's not only America's problem.
striking an hour ago
Sure, but also you might be on a city bus for... half an hour? It's not pleasant to have someone blast noise but it's nothing like a multi-hour flight. Why bother?
mothballed 30 minutes ago
On something like public transit it's often a way of repping your ethnicity/hood. I've been caught in the middle of a knife fight on a California public train car because a guy was blasting Hispanic music intentionally as loud as he could while staring everyone down. Extremely painful (as in ear damaging loud) for everyone, but I didn't say anything because I knew exactly what bait he was laying.
The train car entered a black neighborhood, then a black guy informed him it was his hood and he better knock that shit off. Latino guy immediately pulled out a knife and started swinging.
johnfn an hour ago
I mean, you are painting it as some moralistic judgement, but if you’re asking me for on one hand listening to some annoying music, and on the other hand having some chance (however slight) of bodily injury, knife wound, or whatever… I know which one I am going to choose.
kQq9oHeAz6wLLS 42 minutes ago
> and in America, the odds of bystanders coming to your rescue are... Not zero, but not great
Yes, because there's been a recent push to more heavily punish good Samaritans than perpetrators. When good men get metaphorically crucified for helping, they stop helping.
If that seems like a common sense outcome of such policies, you're right. But as we've seen time and again, common sense is not a flower that grows in everyone's garden.
JumpCrisscross an hour ago
I’ve absolutely seen this nonsense in the UK.
mikkupikku an hour ago
gib444 an hour ago
slg an hour ago
>is a very "traditional" way of fucking with people and expressing your broad contempt for their society.
Motivated in large part as a response to society saying fuck them. I'm not defending assholes being assholes, but I think what we have been seeing in the US over the last 5 or 10 years is classic collapse of the social contract stuff. The less a society cares about its people the less its people will care about the rest of society.
mikkupikku an hour ago
maccard 8 minutes ago
I was on a 2 hour flight this week. The guy in front of me listened to a political podcast on speaker that was loud enough it cut through my noise cancelling earbuds. There was absolutely no chance I was risking my safety calling him out on it in that scenario.
> usually get quickly pointed down by other passengers, personnel or security
I’ve never, not once, heard a member of staff ask someone to use headphones on transport.
jraines 20 minutes ago
Last time I flew my family was very early to the gate; it was me, my wife, my 5 and 3 year old girls, and a very elderly lady in a wheelchair who was blasting Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us” from her phone speakers.
halapro an hour ago
It's a thing everywhere except very well-behaved places/countries. This means it's almost everywhere.
The last time I had an uncle blast his Doujin feed at full volume next to me, I suggested he lower the volume, he didn't care, so I blasted my own feed at louder volume. He got it then. Sadly people a few rows back did the same on the next train...
verall an hour ago
From what I can tell, if no rule is enforced, about 2-5% of people think it's totally normal to scroll tiktok or instagram at full volume in public.
So on a crowded bus you've normally got 1 or 2. Behavior is actually much better on airplanes, usually (maybe 1-2 in ~150 passenger plane), and I have never seen someone who did not silence their phone after being asked politely by the attendant.
Findecanor an hour ago
I've experienced it all over Europe. Trains with reserved seats tend to have a separate "silent car" for this reason.
cjbgkagh 28 minutes ago
Very much a thing and one of the many reasons I'm becoming more of a recluse, shared public spaces are becoming rather unpleasant. Mostly in the US and LatAm, a fair amount in the UK, not so much in Germany.
plagiarist 8 minutes ago
There are fewer and fewer shared public spaces every year anyway. It feels like everything is getting taken over by franchises that want to maximize customer throughput.
nslsm an hour ago
That's because in Europe certain demographics don't catch many planes or trains. But they do catch the tube or the bus, so get on one of those and enjoy the experience.
DaSHacka 30 minutes ago
Lol was wondering how long I would have to scroll before someone pointed out the obvious. People talking about the "collapse of the societal contract", like I wonder how that happened....
wolfi1 27 minutes ago
it's usually some guy on the neighbouring table at McDonald's
bluecalm 37 minutes ago
My experience is the opposite. People blast music or other sounds on flights all the time. In Europe it's also very common to smoke in public, including beaches, restaurants, areas around building entrances. Literring is also very common.
Even Switzerland is dirty because cigarette buts are everywhere. It's just that some % of the population are inconsiderate assholes and only heavy enforcement works vs than. Unfortunately this is something our current society is not willing to do.
gspr an hour ago
I've definitely experienced this on public transit in cities in several different countries here in Europe. It's not an everyday experience, but it definitely happens.
pjmlp an hour ago
Yes, but that isn't a flight.
Hamuko 43 minutes ago
Local trains are full of them.
osti 2 hours ago
During flights? Sounds a bit harsh.
cobbzilla an hour ago
Have you ever tried to sleep while the person next to you watches a movie at full volume?
furyofantares an hour ago
Yeah, it sucks. I agree with you, they should be brutally murdered.
nxpnsv an hour ago
rendaw 27 minutes ago
For all siblings, I think parent was suggesting "while in flight". i.e. dropping them from 30k feet. Hence harsh...
RobotToaster 39 minutes ago
Not harsh enough. They belong in the special level of hell reserved for child molesters and people who talk in the theatre.
Hamuko 42 minutes ago
Harsh, but fair.
SOLAR_FIELDS 37 minutes ago
Now explain why it wouldn’t also be fair to kick people off that were loudly emitting disgusting flatulence. Is it because they “might” not have control over it? Can I not claim I also “might” not have the control over my impulsive desire to listen to music or that I can’t use headphones for a medical issue?
I mean such a thing I would say equally detracts from the flying experience, so why not also kick those people off?
Edit: not sure why I’m getting downvoted, this is a legitimate question. I genuinely want to hear the justification.
DaSHacka 27 minutes ago
throwaway894345 an hour ago
Seems like this flew right over a few heads.
widowlark an hour ago
and yet the joke fell right into our laps
sebastiennight an hour ago
quietsegfault 2 hours ago
NO TICKET
lelanthran an hour ago
I wonder how many people got this reference.
Anyway, for those who did not: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCZ86O3PO-U
chisel192 an hour ago
> During flights? Sounds a bit harsh.
Sounds harsh to you.
Let the market decide.
Vote with your wallet and fly a different airline.
saint11 an hour ago
But kicking someone off mid-flight at high altitude is still a bit harsh. I hope they give them parachutes at least.
dguest 27 minutes ago
HPsquared an hour ago
gumby271 an hour ago
MPSimmons an hour ago
andrewflnr an hour ago
I'm going to vote with my wallet by moving United up my priority list.
integralid an hour ago
Either you missed the joke or I missed your sarcasm. I read GP as a joke: being literally kicked out of a flight in air is a death sentence, which is a bit harsh penalty indeed.
gnabgib an hour ago
Discussion (18 points, 15 days ago, 15 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47276399
binarymax an hour ago
I want to echo the top comment in that post. Apple removing the headphone jack from iPhones was absolutely criminal.
raggi an hour ago
Ok, but how about kicking sick people off of flights, particularly trans continental?
INTPenis an hour ago
I'm behind this 100%.
I got a SARS virus flying to Udon Thani in 2019. We were seated next to two thai guys who were so sick they could barely sit up straight. We offered them help and treats because they looked like they were about to vomit.
Plane lands, next day I'm sick. I was laid up for 2 weeks with fever, the shits, and I had a weird spontaneous cough for over 1 month after I got better.
I bet most of that plane got sick, and it was so damn avoidable.
IncreasePosts 13 minutes ago
The problem is there can he huge penalties for not flying when you booked. You might not be able to rebook your flight or hotel or days off so you're stuck either getting everyone sick or perhaps being out thousands of dollars or not going on vacation at all.
JumpCrisscross an hour ago
> how about kicking sick people off of flights
Difficult for the airline to do given the myriad of health privacy adjacents.
sebastiennight an hour ago
What if we asked the President to give us a quick rundown of each passenger's health?
mikkupikku an hour ago
At cruising altitude, I hope.
HPsquared an hour ago
I assume it's about blasting others with noise, not company sponsored headphones.
mindslight an hour ago
A disinforming clickbait headline strikes again. This isn't about it being mandatory to use headphones, ala TNG "The Game". Rather it's about using speakers that broadcast sound for everyone to "enjoy". I haven't been molested and crushed^w^w^w^wflown in quite some time, but with the noise floor on airplanes being so high to begin with I'd imagine the result is much worse than somewhere that is at least quieter to start.
hxorr 22 minutes ago
This sounds like a USA problem..
penguin_booze 8 minutes ago
1 of n problems.
temporallobe 2 hours ago
Good.
keiferski 2 hours ago
I first interpreted the title as meaning you must use the cheapo free headphones and aren’t allowed to use your own.
standardUser an hour ago
They should be stripped of all citizenship and left to live out their life roaming the airport. But this is a start.
SilverElfin 2 hours ago
We need to also ban people taking calls on speaker in public places like cafes or trains.
lagniappe 2 hours ago
Join the conversation, works every time.
Hamuko 39 minutes ago
I've thought about doing that several times, seeing as they're already including me. Just need to become a bit more brazen of a person.
lokar an hour ago
You should be able to report them to apple and google, lifetime smart phone ban.
irishcoffee 2 hours ago
I don’t think United airlines has the authority to do that.
That is to say, do you really want a federal law passed about this? I vote we go with social shaming. Worked for cigarettes.
balderdash 44 minutes ago
Of course they do - they modified their contract of carriage - which you basically agree to why buy a flight (https://www.united.com/en/us/fly/contract-of-carriage.html) it’s the same mechanism they use to deny you boarding if you are barefoot etc.
mikkupikku an hour ago
It didn't really work well with cigs until govs started banning smoking in restaurants, bars, etc. That said, the shaming was important for setting the social stage for such legal bans.
bigstrat2003 an hour ago
I don't really want that. But I do sometimes fantasize about revoking some people's ability to use speakerphone or reply-all.
SilverElfin an hour ago
Shaming doesn’t always work. I’ve asked politely and been threatened in return by people that look dangerous. That made me want to avoid confrontation in the future.
verdverm an hour ago
An app you can use to play back their audio on a short delay that messes with the brain
paxys an hour ago
Good, now do the same for public transit.
dmitrygr 2 hours ago
Yes! Now do the same on beaches, busses, streets. Same punishment: banishment from the area.
JumpCrisscross an hour ago
> beaches, busses, streets
Bus, sure. On beaches and streets you have the option of moving away. It’s obnoxious. But in the same category as a large group walking slowly.
SilverElfin an hour ago
I often see younger people in parks near me blasting loud music on speakers. It’s so disrespectful to those looking for a peaceful place. Especially when they’re playing explicit rap music with everyone’s families and children around.
wolvoleo an hour ago
Yeah or people on bikes with a boombox. They do it because it's illegal to cycle with earphones in in these parts. But it creates its own problem of course.
mikkupikku an hour ago
JumpCrisscross an hour ago
> It’s so disrespectful to those looking for a peaceful place
Idk, they’re not looking for “a peaceful place” and are using a public space without damaging it. Nobody is forced to use the park at the same time as them. This seems like a difference in preferences which is fine.
which 40 minutes ago
kstrauser an hour ago
leptons an hour ago
izzydata an hour ago
I was recently in Hawaii in the middle of the forest and this group nearby on the trail were blasting music from a bluetooth speaker. Whether it is compelte lack of self awareness or utter disregard for other people it is just disturbing behavior.
austin-cheney an hour ago
I agree with the policy but this is such a mild offense. Just a few years ago in the US there was an epidemic of drunk people savagely beating flight attendants.
People who cannot figure out how to share use of shared space should lose access to those places.
halapro an hour ago
Yes and no. I don't want to be a Karen, but also I think it's fair to not cause discomfort to others. Imagine if every flight was as noisy a city intersection. For 5 hours. And you can't hide.
ashwinnair99 an hour ago
Airlines have been quietly expanding what they can remove you for. This isn't really about headphones. It's about how much discretion crew have now and how little recourse you have at 35,000 feet.
lelanthran an hour ago
Look... if me and 199 other passengers are going to abide by restrictions we were informed about before we paid any money for a ticket, it's completely unfair that the authorities make an exception for one passenger who accepted the same contract we all did.
Arrest them on board, handcuff them and lead them away in handcuffs at the destination. No sympathy from me, especially since the only way the handcuffs route is going to happen is if the passenger in questions ignores the instructions from the flight crew.
I also have to note that on most flights, whether domestic or international, the it's already a criminal offence to ignore an instruction from the flight crew. The airline here did not need to make publish a new rule, they could have simply had the flight crew inform the annoying passenger.
0x3f an hour ago
The airlines could alway remove you for literally any reason. Even if it was discriminatory or otherwise illegal, you'd still definitely be getting off the plane, at least.
standardUser 40 minutes ago
The ones with limited recourse are the flight crew who are trapped with you and a hundred other asshole for hours with no escape and very limited options in case of a serious disruption. If there is one space that has justification to act as temporary dictatorship, it's an aircraft in flight.
leptons an hour ago
You might blame the airlines, but passengers have become more rude and entitled year after year. It's really everywhere now, not just on airplanes. I personally am fine with removing passengers who think they are entitled to annoy the rest of us when we can't just get up and leave the place.
Edit: We seem to have entitled assholes in this thread, from the downvotes I'm getting.