Introducing DoorDash Tasks (about.doordash.com)

35 points by ChrisArchitect 3 hours ago

cheesecompiler an hour ago

Labour getting ever-granular in the age of micro-loans and RentAHuman.

> "Dashers have a new way to earn on their own terms"

The classic meaning inversion of precariousness and lack of benefits as a virtue.

CSMastermind 39 minutes ago

It's also unlocking economic value that was impossible to realize in the old model. If you're sitting around your house with nothing to do for an hour you can now earn money in ways you couldn't before.

ChromaticPanic 6 minutes ago

"Earn money" most markets are so saturated with drivers, nobody is making above minimum wage.

spicyusername 38 minutes ago

"value"

vovavili an hour ago

Neither of these two things are something that DoorDash as a company can realistically do anything about.

matthewdgreen an hour ago

DoorDash lobbies heavily against laws that would regulate labor, or classify its workers as “employees” and thus require they be covered by the minimal protections our country offers.

cortesoft 21 minutes ago

reddozen 41 minutes ago

xienze 36 minutes ago

loa_in_ 36 minutes ago

In a certain Euroland country an analogous delivery company just awards the driver minimum hourly payment on certain agreed before hours if they're clearly working but circumstances had them earn less. Minimum wage requirements stifle nothing.

jrjeksjd8d an hour ago

If only there was some other kind of employment model where people had regular shifts and they were paid consistently and transparently. Unfortunately I also do my office work by logging into an app at 6AM every day and bidding on a white collar job for a mystery amount of time and money

vovavili an hour ago

simonw an hour ago

> Tasks and the new app are currently available in select places in the U.S., excluding California, New York City, Seattle and Colorado.

Anyone know why that is?

(Claude thinks it's because those places have gig worker protection laws such that "classifying Dashers as independent contractors for non-delivery work is most legally risky")

malfist an hour ago

Probably exactly that. Those places have minimum wage laws for gig workers.

flufluflufluffy an hour ago

I have no idea but when reading the article my mind immediately went to businesses having dashers take photos of competing businesses as some type of weird crowdsourced corporate espionage.

k33n 44 minutes ago

Those jurisdictions stifle innovation. Thankfully, the vast majority of the US does not do that. Door Dashers in 99% of the US will now have a button to click that will put more money in their pockets. Very good!

CPLX 17 minutes ago

Piecemeal labor! Shift work! SRO’s! Unlicensed taxis!

I can't imagine what these innovators will come up with next.

EA-3167 42 minutes ago

Innovation in what exactly?

k33n 7 minutes ago

fragmede 42 minutes ago

Pretty sure Task rabbit operates in said jurisdictions, so it's not that.

codemog an hour ago

Meta doesn’t even need to use this, they’re just going to be constantly recording all video and audio from those rayban glasses ;)

Smart move, Zuck.

Ekaros an hour ago

I wonder who can give tasks. And how do they combat potential abuse cases. Surely there is lot of tasks that can be exploited for more nefarious purposes. Or just simply exploiting those that would do the tasks.

hhh an hour ago

There was a startup that did this in the mid 2010s named Magic, but was just via SMS. I used it a few times to get random things done, and it was really useful when it was cheap, then it became mega expensive.

steezeburger an hour ago

I don't quite get how that would work. They were completing tasks to train models but via sms? Can you elaborate?

fragmede 40 minutes ago

nmacias an hour ago

So, Quri (2009, now part of Trax), which was the startup copy of Proctor & Gamble's retail intelligence operations. But now like a sponge for any AI budgets not earmarked for hardware.

balkanist 30 minutes ago

Basically turning their delivery fleet into a crowdsourced data labeling workforce. Smart use of an existing network. The real question is whether dashers will still have jobs once the robots they're training are ready.

PUSH_AX an hour ago

So they’re training a model

jimiasty an hour ago

Interesting - same concept as Amazon Mechanical Turk when you could crowdsource tasks

_doctor_love 38 minutes ago

I had a terrible thought while out on a hike the other day. I'm almost loath to post it on HN because I worry some idiot is going to read it and think it's a good idea. On the other hand, if I thought of it, it's just a matter of time before someone else does.

Here is the idea: programmers may move to a DoorDash like model as well in the future. You may have full time employment but it will be at a much lower base salary than in the past.

Instead of working on "stories" you will work "contracts."

So someone wants feature X or system Y, that's a contract. You get paid on delivery.

Meaning, since it will become possible to build more complete / fleshed out things with enough requirements and so forth with the use of AI, the best programmers will really be the best 'coding drone operators.' Whoever can get the most jobs done in the shortest amount of time at the highest quality for the least tokens, they'll rule the roost.

Real compensation will then happen in terms of boosts to the base salary for getting contracts done, similar to how many execs are paid a low salary and then are expected to earn their keep by the bonuses and equity the earn for delivering results. (Yes, I know, delivering results, har har).

bombcar 31 minutes ago

Congratulations, you invented Upwork!

platelminto 29 minutes ago

So... contractors? I don't understand how what you're describing is any different.

johnisgood 42 minutes ago

Are they supposed to open the food in order to take photos of it?!

wildrhythms 3 minutes ago

No, it's just an inventory check.

wxw 2 hours ago

Neat product expansion. Isn’t this what store employees are already doing though? Maybe it’s more for building datasets.

notatoad 2 hours ago

i think it's just a formalization of this https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/12/waymo-is-paying-doordash-gig...

ocdtrekkie an hour ago

It's essentially mystery shopping. There's a pretty big disconnect between what a large corporate HQ thinks occurs at their stores and what actually occurs at their stores.

malfist an hour ago

Its mystery shopping without any of those pesky minimum wage requirements

paxys an hour ago

Funny to see how creatively tech marketing teams are spinning their push for a permanent underclass in America.

No employment contracts. No benefits. No protections. Unpredictable wages. But hey, it's great because in this new model people have "flexibility" and "freedom".

loa_in_ 43 minutes ago

It's also appears to be a hustle side job employer in PR regarding employment MO, while clearly trying to capture the market for deliveries in weekday work hours.

opengrass an hour ago

Definitely won't be abused by burglars, stalkers and spies.

cdrnsf an hour ago

Introducing DoorDash Deskilling.

AndrewKemendo an hour ago

If you haven’t figured it out by now the future of all work is transfer learning and encoding human action so that all possible action is mechanized and commoditized.

I’ve been obsessed with this problem for the better part of 20 years

The fact that we’re finally starting to see it realized is very exciting

yrds96 15 minutes ago

You should be concerned and not excited. This future might be near than we can imagine and we're just accelerating things without thinking about the consequences.

stego-tech 37 minutes ago

It’d be nice if folks like yourself were equally obsessed with the systemic harms that would come about from solving or addressing this problem rather than charging full-speed ahead into the unknown at everyone else’s expense.

Problems aren’t solely technological in nature, nor are their impacts and solutions. Never forget the humans behind the models.

AndrewKemendo 22 minutes ago

What’s that look like in your mind?

johnisgood 40 minutes ago

Straight out of Black Mirror.