Apple Business (apple.com)
228 points by soheilpro 4 hours ago
meego 3 hours ago
I recently tried setting Apple Business Manager for our ≈20 people SME.
The first step was "Domain Lock/Capture" which takes over all Apple accounts for a specific domain.
I've never had a worse experience from Apple.
The process is buggy, filled with foot-guns and dead ends. It expects huge amounts of work from users who have had their account for more than a few weeks and are expected to remove a lot of their personal data before their account can be migrated (e.g. do you know how to delete all your Health data?). The process is also impossible to cancel.
Phone support was par for the course, e.g. tickets escalated to the abyss, suggestions to restore workstations to factory settings, etc.
Be warned.
geoffharcourt 2 hours ago
The domain lock process was an absolute fiasco at our company. I think this could work if you did this at the time your company launched, but the moment you have employees who have Apple IDs tied to their work email that aren't from the Business Essentials system you are stuck in an impossible-to-mange place.
There are several cheap MDM solutions for Apple devices that I would rather pay for than be dependent on this. (We've used SimpleMDM and love them.)
cocoflunchy 2 hours ago
I'm currently in that hellish process too... I don't know how to get out of it. Did you know that your employees will be forbidden from downloading from the App store once you launched that migration? It's a nightmare
FireBeyond an hour ago
true_religion 29 minutes ago
AFAIK, it works with subdomains, so you can use something like employees.example.com as your domain, and capture over that.
cj an hour ago
We use Apple Business Manager. Locking a domain is not a requirement if you're just doing basic MDM, I'm pretty sure. (I also had a negative experience with it, so we didn't use it and everyone just uses their personal apple IDs). Is it no longer possible to skip this step in setting up the account?
quietsegfault an hour ago
This was my experience switching from GMail to Apple’s mail service. I switched back after a few days.
dfabulich 2 hours ago
Strategically, Apple's not setting themselves up for success here by giving Apple Business away for free (with paid per-user storage bumps).
As a lot of people on this thread have pointed out, Apple's Business Manager needs a lot of improvements. ("Bring your own device" support is terrible, for example. Changing business names requires a perilous migration step. Support reps don't have the tools to fix serious issues.)
If Apple Business were a real revenue source, if they charged luxury prices for a luxurious business support experience, they could pay for developers to fix their stuff.
Instead, Apple Business is a free side hustle for Apple, a hobby. But they're proposing to control your entire domain, to Domain Lock all Apple accounts for your domain, to put your businesses's life in their hands, for "free."
Don't fall for it.
gowld 18 minutes ago
Who would pay them for it before "developers fixed their stuff"?
sleepybrett 2 hours ago
Seems like par for the course for a product launch like this. I'll see where they are in a year.
martibravo 3 hours ago
599$ serviceable MacBooks, easy to use MDM, Cloud, Email and Calendar and flat-fee AppleCare all baked in?
New businesses under 50 employees are going to eat this up like there's no tomorrow.
I'd be scared if I was certain Redmond corporation who makes their money on 365 and Intune.
selectively 3 hours ago
Microsoft is a giant enterprise software company that also publishes Candy Crush and Call of Duty.
Intune and Windows are 'nice to have' but are not the business-business. The business is 365 (which runs on Macs and is worlds better than Apple's office suite + Apple's hosted email is god awful) and Azure.
genthree 3 hours ago
Apple's office suite is my favorite I've ever used, and it's not close.
After that, old copies of MSOffice.
Next-best would be a hodgepodge of the lighter options on Linux and such. Gnumeric, Abiword, that sort of thing. Not great, but at least they're light on resources and easy to use.
Distantly after that, LibreOffice.
Then, modern MSOffice in last place.
The only reason I'd count any of them as "worse" than modern MSOffice is that ~perfect office compatibility and a bulletproof excuse when things go wrong ("I'm also using MSOffice, don't know why your document isn't working") is non-negotiable in any business context.
[EDIT] Oh I forgot about Google. That's actually the true last-place. Modern MSOffice isn't worse than that. Christ the performance is awful.
AnonC 2 hours ago
selectively 2 hours ago
MidnightRider39 3 hours ago
ireadmevs 2 hours ago
Foivos 36 minutes ago
sleepybrett 2 hours ago
martibravo 3 hours ago
A lot of new businesses are going the Notion/Google Drive route for docs, tables and knowledge, plus Canva for presentations and more visual work. It's not the majority, but the market is there.
radicaldreamer 3 hours ago
martibravo 3 hours ago
codeulike 2 hours ago
Exactly. So many people on hn have no idea how diversified Microsoft is, and have no inkling of what the enterprise market is like
Petersipoi 2 hours ago
john_strinlai 19 minutes ago
>I'd be scared if I was certain Redmond corporation who makes their money on 365 and Intune.
scared of what? microsoft doesnt need to care about new businesses with under 50 employees at all. they have governments, banks, universities, colleges, and large non-tech enterprises completely locked down. small business with 10-50 devices are a drop in the ocean.
>New businesses under 50 employees are going to eat this up like there's no tomorrow.
i seriously doubt people outside of the tech or design spheres (i.e. most people) are going to go with apple for their businesses. when you are starting a business, you dont want to also have to teach all of your employees (and possibly yourself) how to use a new operating system.
you are going to look up "local IT company" or "local MSP", ask them to set you up, and they will integrate you into their existing microsoft ecosystem and send over some thinkpads, while you focus on your business.
monster_truck 8 minutes ago
The companies I know of that would be most likely to do this would never buy these because of the integrated webcams, and no "you can disconnect them easily" is not acceptable, as a matter of policy.
p_ing 38 minutes ago
This ignores that Apple is unable to manufacture enough computers per year to be disruptive.
25m Macs in calendar year 2025. Lenovo manufactured 19m PCs in Q4 2025.
Apple simply lacks volume.
tengbretson 31 minutes ago
I imagine the company that currently ships 250m iPhones a year can figure that part out.
FinnKuhn 22 minutes ago
dijit 34 minutes ago
Weird, never had an issue getting my hands on an Apple laptop of any desired configuration, even odd keyboard layouts for the region (UK and Sweden).
Had plenty of issues getting specific specification Thinkpads: because they are largely sold through resellers and they don’t stock all SKUs I suppose.
p_ing 24 minutes ago
odiroot 15 minutes ago
So Lenovo wins in both quantity and quality (at least for T/X series), let alone configurability.
doctorpangloss 34 minutes ago
okay dude, how many phones did it manufacture in Q4 2025?
87m
https://www.semiconductor-today.com/news_items/2026/mar/tern...
do you think lenovo would rather manufacture 19m PCs or 87m phones? i don't know, you raise an interesting point that is wrong.
p_ing 23 minutes ago
rconti 2 hours ago
They need to _commit_ to this, and execute, though. This feels very much like yet another half-hearted Apple initiative.
Henchman21 23 minutes ago
Everything is half-hearted from Apple since Steve died. He was the beating heart. Who has stepped into that role? Like for real? Anyone? I’m just not seeing it
bombcar 2 hours ago
$599 per device? Redmond will make more profit the first year selling a 365 subscription than Apple does on the Neo.
The real competition is going to come from companies using the $599 Neo + Google Workgroups or whatever they're calling it - now Microsoft is cut out entirely.
nolok 2 hours ago
> The real competition is going to come from companies using the $599 Neo + Google Workgroups or whatever they're calling it - now Microsoft is cut out entirely.
The companies doing that are cut in two groups. The one that don't fully plan it and they need to do with complex excel or whatever files here and there and they're still in microsoft's grasp, or those that fully do and move to disposable chromebook.
999900000999 3 hours ago
*499$ with an EDU discount which definitely means they have margin for business deals.
Revenge of the Mac. Theirs simply no reason for any normal person to buy anything else. The year of Linux is deferred yet again.
RussianCow 3 hours ago
> Theirs simply no reason for any normal person to buy anything else.
My wife currently has an old MacBook with 8GB of memory, and she hits the memory limit somewhat regularly just from web browsing and light productivity work. But whether more breathing room in terms of memory is worth almost double the price...
dhosek 2 hours ago
alcidesfonseca 2 hours ago
martibravo 3 hours ago
Agreed. I'd love to see what prices companies get for volume purchases. I'm the IT Manager in a small team and if the Neo and this was available last year when we set up MDM/Exchange/SharePoint I would have considered it. Specially on the hardware side, ROI/longevity on an Apple Silicon Macbook is times higher than any given Windows laptop.
999900000999 3 hours ago
dangus 2 hours ago
I keep shouting from the rooftops the fact that the Neo is really not that disruptive or even necessarily that good of a deal.
Like, have any of you actually looked at street prices at Micro Center or Best Buy recently? In the price range of the higher model Neo you can get a Yoga 7 with an OLED convertible touch screen, 1TB storage, 16GB of RAM, along with a processor with better multicore and iGPU performance (Ryzen 7 AI 350) in a 2-in-1 convertible package that has better battery life doing office tasks.
Yes, the Neo is a cheap machine, with a lot of the exact same cheap machine compromises that are all over the $500-800 laptop market. Not really the best CPU, extremely cut-down battery, missing features, etc.
It even loses keyboard backlighting which is such a standard feature that it might be the only laptop on sale without it.
Losing the haptic trackpad means that the Acer you can buy at Micro Center for $530 with double the RAM and way better I/O (USB4, USB-A 3.0, microSD, and HDMI) has a pretty similar quality of trackpad experience. Yes, I tried both in store, the MacBook Neo's trackpad is really at the same level of all the PC competition.
MacBook Pro/Air Trackpad: 10/10
Best PC haptic trackpads available: 8/10
MacBook Neo trackpad: 7/10
Typical PC mechanical trackpads: 6 or 7/10
Hell, the older generation HP EliteBook 840 G10 that Micro Center sells as a business laptop makes a bunch more sense in a lot of ways. It's also an all-aluminum build thin and light system, comes with more RAM, which is upgradable, has a fingerprint reader, backlit keyboard, etc.
selectively 2 hours ago
999900000999 2 hours ago
dangus 2 hours ago
Serviceable != upgradable or long-lasting.
So many people are going to get burned by the hypnotism of these Neos. They're going to be gateways into being traded in within 2-3 years to get something with more RAM and storage when their owners find out how much they struggle with basic tasks due to insufficient RAM and storage.
If you actually go on Best Buy or Micro Center websites and look at street prices you'll realize that the Neo isn't actually that disruptive.
The trackpad is mid. I've tried it. It's mid enough that basically any PC can compete with the trackpad experience. There are multiple $500-800 PCs that are easy recommendations as alternatives, all with 16GB of RAM, all with modular storage.
The battery in the Neo is so small that even with the extremely efficient iPhone processor inside, basic Windows laptops can beat the Neo in battery life. Grab a Yoga 7 and you've got double the RAM, 2-in-1 convertible touch screen, and better battery life. Oh yeah, and you get a better OLED panel, too.
Schiendelman 6 minutes ago
I think you might be very surprised by what you can do with eight gigs of RAM on Apple Silicon. Apple does hardware compression into memory - it performs as well as a 16 GB machine did with an Intel chip.
Petersipoi 2 hours ago
$500 for 2-3 years is great. And it will last much longer than that in reality.
It's pretty plain to see that the Neo eats any competitors lunch at that price point. It isn't close.
dangus 2 hours ago
carlosjobim 34 minutes ago
Millions and millions of normal people have used 8GB M-series Macbooks for the past 5 years, and nobody has those problems you describe. In fact, everybody is happy to have machines which don't have the usual problems that PCs have.
Computing tasks related to real world scenarios don't need giant RAM repositories, as evident in that people could do these tasks just fine when 32 megabytes of RAM was enough.
sleepybrett 2 hours ago
My phone costs twice as much and I replace it every 2-3 years.
You know what people who outgrow their applebooks are going to do? Buy a macbook air or pro. They aren't going to buy a windows machine. Some might buy a linux machine.
monegator 3 hours ago
Will we be able to change our company details? A couple of years ago we changed the business name, so let's change it in the account for billing and such.
Not possible.
Ok, let's ask support what to do: the only thing we can do is create a new account, get the approval, etc. and then ask for a migration that may or may not be approved and may or may not end succesfully.
In the end we keep receiving the bills in the old name, then change it manually or append a note.
Marsymars 3 hours ago
A bit like the awful workflow around developer agreements in App Store Connect. Every few months our CI breaks because Apple has updated one agreement or another and someone has to go pester the executive who's marked as the account owner and has legal authority to sign new agreements to unbreak our CI.
It's also impossible to delegate this authority to anyone other than the account owner, and there's no concept of shared or service accounts, so nobody other than the account owner, with access to their 2FA method is able to do this.
Heaven forbid if the account owner was ever to put their 2FA method as a personal device / phone and then leave the company.
monegator 17 minutes ago
All of these, too. Then for some goddamn reason i no longer can just input the username and password: for one of the developer accounts it has decided that i also have to decide wether i want to authenticate with an apple device, or by password. So it's another couple of clicks i can't get rid of
embedding-shape 3 hours ago
I guess ultimately it's easier and works better than when you move country and would like to update the country for PSN (PlayStation Network). Sony's advice? Close the old account and open a new one with the correct country, then buy the same stuff again.
iknowstuff 3 hours ago
Haha ah of course. It’s not like you ever actually owned them in the first place.
moduspol 2 hours ago
I'm called by a name that is not the same as my legal name. I somehow got an Apple Developer account during the first few years of it with my preferred name, but it had my parents' house as the mailing address.
I was essentially told that I could update the mailing address but going through the steps for that process would result in the name on my account being changed to the legal name. And so today, it still has my parents' mailing address. Thankfully they haven't moved.
technothrasher 19 minutes ago
I've still got a phantom child on my Apple account because when I tried to create a child's account many years ago for my son it somehow messed up and used the current year instead of his birth year. Support said too bad, no possible way to fix that. So I had to create another account for my real son, and while he grew up and moved out, my phantom son still lives with us for another nine years until it is old enough that I can delete it.
moduspol 11 minutes ago
miskin 8 minutes ago
It would be great if you could get correct invoice and pay price without VAT in EU as a VAT registered business. It is incredible they can get around without providing such a basic thing for so long.
DeathArrow a minute ago
So they try to pull a Microsoft?
SamuelAdams 3 hours ago
So do enterprises still need Jamf [1]? For context, Jamf is one of the most common MDM tools for organizations.
Someone1234 3 hours ago
Yep. People who have never tried to add Mac support to an existing organization do not realize how freaking expensive it is.
There are basically two cases. If you use Microsoft, you are often already paying for Entra ID and Intune, then still adding the Apple-side pieces for Mac support: Apple Business Manager and often Jamf or Kandji. If you do not use Microsoft, you are buying the full stack yourself: Okta or JumpCloud for identity, Jamf or Kandji for device management, and Apple Business Manager for enrollment. Apple Business Manager is free, but the rest is not, and the cost adds up fast.
This means that, in practice, a managed Mac can easily end up costing close to twice as much to support as a Windows device.
wpm an hour ago
The only thing you need out of any of those to correctly support the Mac is an MDM, of which there are free ones and expensive ones and everything in between. So long as it can deploy configuration profiles and declarative management configs, you can spin up Munki to be your pkg/script runner and script the rest. Installomator to install and patch applications.
But if you also wanted identity, there are plenty of free selfhostable SSO/ID providers out there. If you're just starting out and not at the scale where a big Microsoft CoPilotM365OfficeWhatever contract makes sense, you probably don't even really have a need for a lot of this stuff. A minimum contract for Jamf Pro is like $5k a year or something. That's two well kitted developer MacBook Pros per year in license costs.
xbryanx 2 hours ago
Totally agree on the hidden costs. We've seen some great value in going with Mosyle for this. Lots cheaper, and it "just works."
awakeasleep 3 hours ago
Big yes. Enterprises need support and a relationship with their supplier where their needs can change product direction.
Jamf will do that. Apple will not.
drcongo 3 hours ago
Dunno if you've ever had a business relationship with Apple but they're really good on that front. Proactive and helpful, along with always trying to sell you stuff, but proactive and helpful nonetheless.
bigyabai 3 hours ago
giobox 3 hours ago
How does this differ from the existing "Business Essentials" tool? The landing page for each looks like much the same product, at least the MDM stuff does?
martibravo 3 hours ago
Email, Calendar and company directory built in, custom domains in emails I think... It's more like a MS365 basic version. Which for most small teams is more than enough
jacobgkau 3 hours ago
One of the footnotes at the bottom of the page says:
> Apple Business Essentials, Apple Business Manager, and Apple Business Connect will no longer be available once Apple Business launches.
So it's a consolidation. They call out Business Connect data as "including claimed locations, place card information, photos, organization information, account details, and more," so that's some of what differs from Business Essentials.
workfromspace 3 hours ago
Maybe also 200 countries included, instead of just the USA?
simonw 3 hours ago
I wonder if this was timed to lineup with the MacBook Neo launch, which makes the idea of equipping your entire company with Mac laptops a lot more compelling from a cost perspective.
10729287 3 hours ago
There’s a grey one. So obviously, it was timed.
SunshineTheCat 3 hours ago
It's kinda crazy it took Apple this long to make this.
I've worked with two agencies now that used only Macs across the business and had a really fun time signing in to and integrating 58 Google services every time they hired someone new.
It's possible people may continue to use Google Workspaces in these places, however, the fact that there was never even an Apple option was always wild to me.
zzyzxd 3 hours ago
This is interesting to me as the IT support for my family. I have been considering using MDM to provision Wi-Fi credentials and other device configurations. 3rd party solutions are a little bit too much for what I need.
Apple Business Essentials with AppleCare+ for 3 devices and 200GB iCloud storage is $19.99 per user/mo. That's the same price as AppleCare One alone.
alchemist1e9 3 hours ago
I wanted to use the existing ABE product for exactly that, especially as you can actually lockdown apple devices properly to stop teens from undoing VPN settings etc … however it’s explicitly against their policies to use ABE for personal devices and I’d guess the same for this new iteration of it.
zzyzxd 2 hours ago
You are right. I didn't read the terms. Looks like ABE can only be used by a business entity.
bitpush 3 hours ago
Who will Apple serve? Users, Apple or their partners?
It has always been Apple > Users > Partners.
There's a reason why Microsoft is still the king of enterprises. Anybody getting involved with this with Apple will deserve everything thats coming their way
NetMageSCW 3 hours ago
Thousands in annual savings?
bigyabai 3 hours ago
Not on iOS, being locked into the App Store never saved me a dime.
georgeburdell 4 hours ago
One of the last great consumer companies is going B2B
dagmx 4 hours ago
Apple always had a B2B component. This is just the latest attempt to not make it completely subpar.
furyofantares 3 hours ago
This sucks. This page makes it clear this is the motivation for "Ads on Maps", as they talk about it prominently here - they are now directly selling the attention of their device consumers to their business customers.
I guess they were doing that before in the App Store, which is of course also awful.
Barbing 3 hours ago
amelius 3 hours ago
They need to go OEM.
nhubbard 2 hours ago
They did it in the 1990s and it failed so hard that it almost took down the company.
amelius 2 hours ago
lvspiff 3 hours ago
its the only path to go to be able to continue to support their pricing models - they've priced the consumer/pro-sumer out of the market prettymuch and so B2B is the more sustainable paying population.
swiftcoder 3 hours ago
> they've priced the consumer/pro-sumer out of the market prettymuch
I'd argue that (the low end of) Apple products are the cheapest they've ever been - the $599 iPhone 17e is below the inflation-adjusted price of the original iPhone, and at $599 the MacBook Neo is the cheapest launch price an Apple laptop has ever listed at (not even adjusting for inflation!)
The maximum amount you can spend at the high-end has certainly gone up over time, although the basic MacBook Pro Max config costs roughly the same as it's peer from 10-15 years ago - nobody's forcing folks to shell out for the 128GB of RAM (something that didn't exist on laptops at all till very recently)
kstrauser 3 hours ago
The company that just made a $600 Macbook?
bigyabai 3 hours ago
Brajeshwar 3 hours ago
> Starting April 14, Apple Business will be available as a free service in the U.S. and 200+ countries and regions to new and existing users of Apple Business Connect, Apple Business Essentials, and Apple Business Manager.
Does this mean — Always Free or Introductory Free for now?
martibravo 3 hours ago
I understand it's free to set up the business but iCloud, AppleCare and Email/Calendar storage past the free (I suppose tiny) allowance are paid. As Apple loves, freemium with in-app purchases!
jryio 3 hours ago
When Apple vertically integrates it works for them. All the way from the cloud to the OS to the hardware. Pretty sure this will beat out tools like JAMF on user privacy alone by running trusted MDM adjacent tools in kernel space.
Yes sure you can use a different tool for any of these, defaults dominate for the same reason Google pays ~15 billion to be the default search engine on iPhones.
dehrmann 3 hours ago
Apple's really late to this.
tencentshill 2 hours ago
They are just combining existing services: Apple Business Essentials, Apple Business Manager, and Apple Business Connect.
It's like Microsoft now - put everything under one massive convoluted control panel.
AndrewKemendo 3 hours ago
Apple is “late” to everything which is why it’s the leader
Being early is the same as being wrong and there’s no business value in costly exploration of new territory at least in the 21st century
Name me a single company that is still in business and dominating a market based on being first to market with a new product.
sosodev 3 hours ago
TSMC. They dominate the semiconductor market because they're consistently first to market with the world's most advanced chip fabrication.
ceejayoz 3 hours ago
AndrewKemendo 3 hours ago
jackdh 3 hours ago
Depending on how you define "new" but there are certainly examples of this, Spotify is the first to come to mind, AWS could be another.
bitpush 3 hours ago
Vision Pro.
d-us-vb 3 hours ago
NetMageSCW 3 hours ago
layer8 2 hours ago
unshavedyak 3 hours ago
AndrewKemendo 3 hours ago
valzam 3 hours ago
Ok but "Business Email" wasn't exactly invented yesterday...
AndrewKemendo 2 hours ago
popupeyecare an hour ago
Will this allow iPad profiles? I think that’s a feature in edu? Would be a game changer.
alexchapman 3 hours ago
Wow, Apple's finally competing with Google and Microsoft, I can see businesses adopting this everywhere lol, then again Idk as a lot of companies are already in Google and Microsoft's ecosystem.
tynanpurdy 31 minutes ago
I'm linking my keytrace.dev: did:plc:6ayddqghxhciedbaofoxkcbs
bouk 3 hours ago
Hopefully some actual competition against GSuite (or whatever it's called these days)
AlotOfReading 3 hours ago
I occasionally trial complete switches to Apple services to see if they're viable as Google alternatives. This weekend was Apple maps and it's finally met my standard of "usable", though not quite "good". One of the places it beat Google maps was the lack of integrated advertising places, which have enshittified the latter.
I'm glad Apple announced their own plans to enshittify before I got my hopes up.
Barbing 3 hours ago
Such a huge bummer.
Hey, Big Ad Tech, come try enshitify my Rand McNally.
minimaxir 3 hours ago
It is very funny that a business-oriented product does not highlight Apple's business productivity software in iWork (Pages/Numbers/Keynote).
steve1977 2 hours ago
I thought that's now considered creator productivity software.
throwaw12 3 hours ago
I assume this is a SaaS by Apple which covers some parts of Workday and Google suite for the beginning
They're basically planning to enter the market where Microsoft has dominant position.
Hamuko 27 minutes ago
>Company data remains secure while employee data remains private, with cryptographic separation of work and personal data on devices.
Does this mean that I'm able to enroll two Apple Accounts on an iPhone at once? Or does Apple actually think that I'm gonna be storing personal data, such as my health data, on a company device with a company-managed Apple Account?
At the moment I just have two iPhones: my personal iPhone that has my data and is connected to my Apple Watch, and my work iPhone, which sits on a desk and does nothing. The separate Apple Account on the work one means that I can't connect it to an Apple Watch and I can't download my apps on it, so you either can't accumulate any personal data on the device, or you need to submit all of your personal data to your employer's Apple Account. Including whatever health data your Apple Watch produces.
ark4n 2 hours ago
Feels like yet another distraction. I personally believe Apple would benefit from a renewed focus. Product lines are growing, software too, software qualify is not doing well... this is the same pattern that got Apple into a mess before Jobs returned. Sure, things are not exactly the same but it feels like time is echoing here.
I am sure "BUT BUSINESS AND MONEY" is the answer but that feels like a cop out in this case.
Nevermark 3 hours ago
Machines spec’d and priced for education? Support for businesses?
I remember this!
creantum 3 hours ago
I had to look at my calendar to be sure it wasn’t 2001
Hexigonz 2 hours ago
Hard pass on ads in apple maps. Their navigation was already pretty terrible, this was the reminder I needed to download something else
2OEH8eoCRo0 2 hours ago
Incredible. What is this? Actual competition? I don't believe my eyes. Is Apple search next?
iknowstuff 42 minutes ago
they had an opening in search with Siri and AI and missed it.
wigster 2 hours ago
do they demand 30% of turnover?
zb3 3 hours ago
So will Apple users be able disable these ads in maps?
lowdude an hour ago
The nice thing about many of the native apps compared to their Google pendants is the absence of ads, with the glaring exception of the app store, which looks like a dumpster-fire. It is so disheartening to see the trend of shoving ads everywhere continue with Apple as well. I guess the profits are just too tempting to stick with idealistic UX decisions, if there was any of that left in the first place.
cdrnsf 3 hours ago
I would expect, much like the App Store, they will not. Their maps will give you directions to navigate the enshittification curve.
wereHamster 3 hours ago
business.apple.com doesn't work in Firefox, it redirects you to https://business.apple.com/abm_unsupported_browser?reason=Br...
Fuck you Apple.
lowdude 2 hours ago
Yes, and it works with a user agent switcher extension for Firefox, which is always the cherry on top.
Alifatisk 3 hours ago
Supported browser:
Safari (14.1 or later)
Chrome (87 or later)
Microsoft Edge (87 or later)
https://support.apple.com/guide/apple-business-manager/progr...We live in fantastic times
jwlake 3 hours ago
A non-terrible MDM that actually works would be really nice. The rest I doubt they get much traction on. Gmail is too easy, Google docs and sheets if you don't need Microsoft is also way better than Apple's free apps.
rjrjrjrj 2 hours ago
Is it possible to make a non-terrible MDM?
Not a particular area of expertise for me, but the times I've had to deal with it just seemed like an inherently complex and messy problem.
egorfine an hour ago
Nothing like account termination with all your corporate email with no recourse and support because fuck you that's why.
Absolutely do not touch this product with a ten-foot pole.
FergusArgyll 43 minutes ago
Capitalism works, it may work slowly enough for HN to complain but it works. When MSFT fails their customers, Apple picks up the tab...