Flighty Airports (flighty.com)

486 points by skogstokig 19 hours ago

nathancahill 4 hours ago

degenerate 4 hours ago

Misery Map adds two crucial pieces of context: the delays between airports, and rain/snow on the map, which often is the reason for delays. It's nice to see it all together.

ChrisClark an hour ago

Any way to see other airports? I never travel to the US

ViktorRay 4 hours ago

Pretty interesting link as well. Thanks for sharing

HarHarVeryFunny 8 hours ago

I'm not sure the use case for this. It seems the information provided is just number of on-time/delayed/cancelled flights, but how is the user meant to use that information? Check before booking flight and choose another airport it it has more on-time flights? I think most people are just going to fly out of the nearest/most convenient airport and hope for the best.

I was hoping this might have information about length of security lines, a bit like Google maps indicating delays due to traffic build up, but this doesn't seem to be there. That would have been useful/actionable - give an idea how far ahead to arrive at airport to make it through security.

bodhiJhawken 7 hours ago

Flighty is generally built around supporting your flight experience. I’m a touring lighting designer, and I spend a fairly large portion of my life in the air. Myself and most other touring crew I know adore Flighty. We get precious few hours to sleep, and being able to sleep in a few extra hours due to delays or spend an extra 30 minutes in the lounge eating and showing makes the difference between a good show and a bad show.

Flighty has 99% of the time notified me about issues before airlines have. In a couple situations it’s been more than 6 hours ahead of airline communication and I can personally speak to the amount of shows myself and my artists have been able to make because of an early notification about a delay or cancellation giving us enough time to reroute before everyone else rebooks.

Also the flighty passport has some amazing data and stats we all love to share with each other every year.

The new update just looks to add another tool to the flighty tool belt to keep me appraised of how likely I am to make it to my next show. Jury is still out on how good the data is though!

atonse 6 hours ago

I travel 4-5 trips a year and I didn't hesitate for a second to pay for Flighty, because this was one of those "man these guys deserve to be rewarded for the amazing job they've done"

I have had at least 2-3 situations where Flighty gave me information before the airport did, and that I ended up being a guy informing a few fellow passengers on the status of our flight before the airlines did.

They've chosen a niche, have executed extremely well, and I'm happy to throw $50/year at them to say thank you for an excellent product that does everything I want.

My ONLY complaint is that during a flight, flighty's live activity or something uses up a TON of battery. It seems unlike them to overlook such a thing when the rest of the app has such a polish and attention to detail (form and function-wise)

malfist 7 hours ago

You created this account 14 minutes prior to this post. Forgive me if I don't trust your testimonials. Feels very astroturf

bodhiJhawken 7 hours ago

bzillins 5 hours ago

xvector 6 hours ago

bob1029 6 hours ago

> a bit like Google maps indicating delays due to traffic build up,

Traffic on google maps might actually be a good canary for airport issues.

ZeWaka 17 hours ago

If you fly a lot, you might also be aware of the National Airspace System Status: https://nasstatus.faa.gov/

It also has links to a lot of other information useful for people in the airline industry.

I find the Airport Arrival Demand Chart to be good for seeing a big picture of all the flights: https://www.fly.faa.gov/aadc/

jpalawaga 4 hours ago

I've never seen the nasstatus page, but I have seen the OIS page, which I use frequently when experiencing delays to find out what's going on: https://www.fly.faa.gov/ois/?legacy=true

The links on the NAS page are also really good. nice share!

sssilver 14 hours ago

Such delightful UI.

One small thought: as I scroll down on a particular airport page, it would be useful for that page to always display the airport's name in a fixed position. I've opened up a few airports and scrolled down to look at the data, and then was unable to tell which page was which airport without scrolling the pages back to the top (I later realized I could just look at the URL, which is cool).

nobrains 9 hours ago

did u see the TV mode link? i wish more visualization sites had that.

__MatrixMan__ 4 hours ago

What would be super useful is an indicator of how long it takes to get through TSA

JDEW 6 hours ago

CDG shows yellow (“minor issues”), 65% of planes arrive on time, 0% cancelled. FRA shows green (“normal operations”) 59% of planes arrive on time, 4% cancelled.

Surely that’s wrong?

socalgal2 2 hours ago

Curious what the criteria are for which airports to show at a given zoom level.

At the default for me it showed SFO and SAN, both green, and did not show LAX. LAX is a bigger and busier airport than SFO and SAN.

I'm not saying they were wrong not to show it. Just curious - It was apparently a common interview question - what place names should you show a map at a certain zoom level.

culopatin 14 hours ago

How does an app like this make money? I made an app that I simply can’t promote because it would bankrupt me. Every person I share it with thinks it’s genius and been using it but if it ever hits critical mass without me knowing it, id be those guys with the “my cloud provider reamed me overnight” posts.

nemothekid 14 hours ago

I use the Flighty app pretty often, and its $60/year.

kimos 7 hours ago

This app brings me so much delight. Seeing the incoming plane, knowing % chance of onetime or late.

Honestly I often know changes from Flighty for my flights before the airlines do or at least before they notify me. I had once my carrier said on time and Flighty said 90 mins delay. I went to the airport on time and turns out flight was delayed. Should have just trusted them!

devilbunny 6 hours ago

friendzis 12 hours ago

The app is mac/i os-only, though.

halapro 12 hours ago

littlecranky67 13 hours ago

Why does everything have to make money? People like to built things as a hobby. If you stay away from expensive cloud providers and use cheap vServers, you can host a site like that for around 5-20$/month (depending on number of users).

jasode 11 hours ago

>Why does everything have to make money? People like to built things as a hobby.

The gp asked a reasonable question. Your admonition about making money is misplaced because your assumption about it being a hobby is incorrect.

The website was developed by Flighty LLC. To answer the gp's question: Although the website itself doesn't have direct monetization, it acts as "inbound marketing" for the paid iOS app. Clicking on "Download Flighty" takes the user to the Apple App Store:

  In-App Purchases
  Week-to-Week Flighty Pro         $4.99
  Annual Savings Flighty Pro      $59.99
  Month-to-Month Flighty Pro       $9.99
  Annual Savings (Family Plan)   $119.00
  Lifetime Flighty Pro           $299.00
  Flexible Monthly (Family Plan)  $15.99
  Week-to-Week Flighty Pro         $4.99
  Week-to-Week Flighty Pro         $7.99
  Pro Family Lifetime            $449.00
  Annual Savings Flighty Pro      $59.99
The website's hyperlink url to the App Store page also has a tracking id so the company can attribute downloads/sales back to the webpage. This lets them see how well the "free website" is converting to paid customers. As a vehicle to generate sales leads, it seems to work very well. To wit... Wikipedia says the company has been in business for 7 years and it's been upvoted to the HN front page and we're discussing it. (The Flighty website is an example of the old saying, "The best advertising is free advertising.")

It's not just a $5/month VPS. Some cursory googling says Flighty gets data from the FlightAware Firehose api which costs a lot of money. The cost would exceed the financial resources of most people to make an equivalent free hobby website. (https://www.flightaware.com/commercial/firehose/documentatio...)

littlecranky67 8 hours ago

drcongo 8 hours ago

culopatin 5 hours ago

You don’t know anything about my app though. I just couldn’t believe that many people would pay this subscription to keep it going. I’m not trying to make money, I just don’t need it to drain my account

GJim 11 hours ago

Some people wonder why kids climb trees.

woadwarrior01 9 hours ago

Subscriptions on the iOS app. Per SensorTower, it's making ~$1m/month.

https://app.sensortower.com/overview/1358823008?country=US

culopatin 5 hours ago

That to me is amazing. I would not pay that much for this and I guess I project that on the user base

barbs 8 hours ago

Makes me wonder then why they can't afford a team of Android developers to make the Android version.

kimos 7 hours ago

aurmc 4 hours ago

avalys 7 hours ago

chinathrow 12 hours ago

Why do you need a cloud provider? Can't a 5$ VPS do the job?

esseph 8 hours ago

That's just a cloud with a different company's name attached.

aledevv 9 hours ago

The popularity and traffic it brings is a gain and a value itself. The web specialists will be able to simply convert it into economic value.

vasco 14 hours ago

All my projects are also pure genius and the only reason they are not hyper successful is they'd be too expensive to run too.

The main reason I also am not president of the world already is because I wouldn't like the attention.

ggsp 11 hours ago

Have you asked people how much they'd be willing to pay?

teaearlgraycold 12 hours ago

What’s your app? Where do the costs come from?

throwaway290 14 hours ago

pro features and IAP

WaxProlix 14 hours ago

Ads? It's not great for users but it's decent monetization. If you really have something good, like actually liked, you can do a donation vs ad-supported model.

culopatin 5 hours ago

I’ve ran the numbers and the APIs I have to pay for would be more expensive. I’ve tried caching the data which works to some degree but still a negative unless I really degrade the experience

hmartin 19 hours ago

Love Flightly, one of the best apps ever. Beautiful design + incredibly useful info.

sneak 18 hours ago

Flighty is poorly designed.

It’s one of those slick apps designed to superficially look nice without actually being well-thought-out. That’s not what design is or should mean; that’s just aesthetics.

Case in point: one of the most important pieces of data for a flight, its duration, is displayed in the tiniest type size on the flight info display pane, in light grey text on a slightly darker grey background. It’s bordering on illegible.

It also doesn’t surface boarding time (or countdown to same), which is the single most important piece of data a flight tracker can give you.

exidy 17 hours ago

> one of the most important pieces of data for a flight, its duration

Flighty is all about getting you to the airport in time for your flight, so the most important pieces of information are things like departure times, connection times, delay information, terminal and boarding gate. These are prioritised in the interface.

The flight duration is set when you book the flight and it's not going to change, there is no reason to prioritise this.

> It also doesn’t surface boarding time

I think this would be useful but difficult data to get. Airlines sometimes will push boarding announcements to their own apps but I doubt they would agree to feed Flighty.

yosito 14 hours ago

ymolodtsov 11 hours ago

ZeWaka 17 hours ago

zeroonetwothree 14 hours ago

Why is duration important? Surely you already knew what it was when you booked and it's not like it changes. I can't say that I've ever wanted to double check the duration of my flight.

friendzis 12 hours ago

rconti 14 hours ago

I think the design is great; my only gripe is it's awful on the iPad mini. But so are Apple apps. They think it makes sense for the side drawer (in portrait mode) to cover half the screen. Which is especially insane in apps with maps where the drawer COVERS THE "YOU ARE HERE" DOT.

nemothekid 14 hours ago

>one of the most important pieces of data for a flight, its duration,

What is your use case for Flighty, and why would this information be important at all?

sneak 6 minutes ago

oslem 13 hours ago

I use their widgets more than the app itself. They display the most important information I need well imo.

chiefgeek 19 hours ago

Flighty is a great app. I travel a lot and use it all the time to manage my flights. Highly recommend.

pinkmuffinere 19 hours ago

I think this may be a 'bug': as you zoom into the US west coast, SAN is visible before LAX. But LAX serves much more people every day, so a random person is much more likely to care about LAX. Intuitively, it seems to me that LAX should show up first. That could be intentional, but I can't think of a good reason why that choice would be made.

mh- 16 hours ago

Google Maps has had this bug with street names not revealing based on any rational priority at varying zoom levels.. for like a decade.

I'm going to start using this as an interview question for people to solve.

16bytes 4 hours ago

If you think this is an easy problem to solve, here's an old article that discusses some of the challenges in doing so:

https://medium.com/google-design/google-maps-cb0326d165f5

mh- 3 hours ago

friendzis 5 hours ago

Not only that, but airports blink in-and-out of existence as you zoom or pan the map around. It can't even decide if it wants to show a certain airport or not.

phinnaeus 19 hours ago

Similar in Australia, BNE shows up before SYD.

Edit: actually it's even weirder. Here's the zoom levels I see, from zoomed out, to zoomed in:

- BNE, MEL

- BNE, SYD, MEL

- BNE, CBR, MEL (??)

- BNE, SYD, CBR, MEL

friendzis 5 hours ago

This screams vibe-coded slop. Think about it, if you were to implement zoom based detail level, you would have to try hard to introduce a bug on line 3, yet it happens to hit prod.

Yet, this thread is full of people defending this pre-alpha quality thing.

chupchap 18 hours ago

Haha I came in to write the exact same thing. Such a weird choice

jerlam 19 hours ago

I think the map is biased towards airports with the most disruptions, not the largest.

elAhmo 5 hours ago

Flighty is nearly useless when using low-cost carriers, such as RyanAir, WizzAir, etc, which seem to be predominantly covering destinations I use.

dneri 7 hours ago

Flighty is easily my favorite iOS app. I fly 10-20 times a year, mostly recreationally, and have come to rely on Flighty for travel updates, tracking my partners flights, and general stats through their Passport feature. Beautifully designed, and it just seems like they’ve really thought through every feature. It’s the gold standard for apps.

friendzis 12 hours ago

Note: the web interface exposes minimal info, the rest is hidden in a mac-only app. Don't bother.

dewey 8 hours ago

It has always been an iPhone app for many years, only now they have exposed some information on the site (Probably for getting incoming links), so this is more interesting if you are already an existing user of the app.

mi_lk 8 hours ago

You only really need to know when (departure/arrival time) and where (terminal/gate), no?

What else necessary info that’s missing?

cantalopes 12 hours ago

I mean, still better than having to go to airports' official pages

friendzis 12 hours ago

A select airport view has flight data limited to some x hours, meaning you cannot even see if a flight later in the day is still scheduled to arrive on time without consulting those official pages anyway. So quite objectively no, it's not even objectively worse, it's effectively useless.

Going back to a map view from an airport view resets the map, so exploration for fun is again borderline unusable.

RobotToaster 9 hours ago

Was going to say this. I'm getting real tired of sites trying to force me to download their spyware apps

reason3316 15 hours ago

Flighty is terrific, well worth the subscription cost. I'm delighted to see a replacement for the last part of FlightAware I still used.

aresant 17 hours ago

Clicked this and was hopeful it was a TSA-line-tracker

Anybody have a good solution that's utilizing actual traveler data vs the (non existent atm) TSA data?

halapro 15 hours ago

How do you expect that to work? Automatic reporting is impossible, you have to rely on individuals to arrive there, open the app and take a guess. Then by the time you see the report the line is long gone (or tripled)

This request has no basis in reality.

awill 15 hours ago

Not sure how they're getting their data, but https://tsa.fromthetraytable.com/

Shank 14 hours ago

TheDong 13 hours ago

Ideally the TSA at each airport would measure it and release it. They should be measuring it anyway since they should both have efficiency targets for how much of a delay they introduce, and also so that they can show data about how much or little inconvenience they cause when DOGE finally comes to cut one of the actually utterly useless government expenditures.

Since the TSA doesn't seem to be releasing this data though, apple or google could spy on GPS and motion data for individuals to estimate when people entire the line and pass through security, and derive a better-than-nothing estimate. It does seem like the government refusing to do something, and apple/google stepping in and doing a government-like thing is a norm, so even though I'm joking I wouldn't even be that surprised.

codingjoe 5 hours ago

Does it show ICEy conditions too?

exidy 17 hours ago

While I appreciate the aesthetics of this feature I actually fear it represents a loss of focus for Flighty. As a traveller, I don't need a global view of airport disruptions, I need relevant info for my flights.

Given the prominent TV Mode button in the interface, this update seems to be about competing with Flightradar24, who sell business subscriptions for airports and related sectors for information displays.

ymolodtsov 11 hours ago

I disagree. I live in Lisbon and the local airport is in a pretty bad condition these days. It's helpful to be able to get a general view.

jitl 15 hours ago

it sounds like the app already does what you need it to do. developers can spend a few hours on something other than #1 most pressing core feature every now and then.

JCharante 13 hours ago

the app has so many bugs and missing features, I'm not a heavy user just like 60 flights a year but I love and hate flighty

dewey 8 hours ago

Having the departure / arrival boards of the airports in the app in a easy to find and uniform way is a great feature and is exactly what I pay Flighty for. Having to find this information on airport websites is horrible and the alternative websites for that are usually filled with ads or behind a lock screen.

I'd say that's exactly the focus for Flighty to have that.

bronco21016 15 hours ago

I agree. The reason I love Flighty vs FlightAware or Flightradar24 is because the app is solely focused on my flights. The real-time tactical information about delays and inbound aircraft is so good that it is very heavily used by airline employees since even the airlines are not great about providing this data in a timely fashion to their front line employees.

The dashboard is really nice and if it remained free I could see integrating it into a display's playlist in my office but, I highly doubt this doesn't turn into a hefty subscription service.

kylehotchkiss 17 hours ago

They can do both things at once. Airports desperately need to be displaying accurate information and stop letting gate agents make random calls based on their interpreting of company policy

logifail 15 hours ago

> Airports desperately need to be displaying accurate information [..]

Airports and airlines may have information that they deliberately do not share with passengers.

For example: a large European airport that I once did some work for ran a trial in which they announced departure boarding gates significantly earlier. The effect was that passengers went to their gates earlier.

The side effect was that retail revenues in the terminal fell during the trial. Yes, this was a metric.

Guess what? They decided not to proceed with announcing departure gates earlier and went back to the previous system.

jt2190 18 hours ago

I was thinking this was something to help estimate the time to get through airport security. It's still very cool, though. I love the TV mode!

Esophagus4 18 hours ago

MyTSA has that (or… I presume will have that again once TSA is back online).

Individual airports also may have wait times on their website, but results can vary.

jt2190 7 hours ago

Yeah, I think that flighty already aggregates various data sources to predict flight delays, I thought maybe they were expanding to include security wait times.

sklargh 3 hours ago

Also recommend nasstatus.FAA.gov

peterchane 14 hours ago

I wish they would add hotel reservations. Loss of focus but I want it as much as flight tracking.

oompydoompy74 6 hours ago

What’s up with all the complaining that this wonderful app isn’t available on non Apple platforms? Android isn’t worth it for monetization and one of the reasons Flighty is so good is that the developer picked a platform and created a native app. Idgi.

eagerpace 17 hours ago

Maybe this week is an edge but a lot of airports, including mine, are showing no issues, but have major issues outside of flights being on time

ryeguy_24 19 hours ago

I rarely bookmark things but just did. For some reason, I never get this data concisely from Google search and always look for it. Nice job.

reader9274 19 hours ago

I have about 3000+ bookmarks in my KaraKeep instance

enos_feedler 19 hours ago

Notice a lot of Canadian airports are yellow right now. Is this normal?

peterchane 14 hours ago

On one level I'd love for them to add in my hotel reservations so I have my whole trip in one place. But hotels don't need real time tracking like flights do.

nixass 17 hours ago

A website requiring me to download their app for detailed report on certain airport is not worth my time.

LeoPanthera 16 hours ago

Flighty is an app. Not a website. The website just tells you about the app.

I think you probably know that though.

globular-toast 13 hours ago

Isn't this currently showing a flaw in their system? It correctly shows LaGuardia as having issues but also shows nearby airports as having issues due to severe arrival delays. But surely those delays are also due to LaGuardia? Maybe that's still useful, though? I don't know. Rarely fly.

ZeWaka 12 hours ago

A lot of that was due to LGA, yes. However, that doesn't stop those airports from being affected. Getting tons of traffic rerouted is inevitably going to cause delays across the whole airspace. Very useful to know.

daikon899 15 hours ago

Very pleasant UI. Good job!

throwaway290 14 hours ago

"Most disrupted" routes/airlines should be adjusted. Right now now it shows total numbers so the main airline or destination of any airport is always "most disrupted" which is a bit useless

jryio 19 hours ago

Flighty is a good representation of what craft - compounded over time - gives you.

Everything from on design, to features, to data integrations. It's everything that vibe coding and agents don't get you. I appreciate their craft.

alberth 18 hours ago

Flighty is very pretty, but I’m not giving up FlightAware anytime soon.

I travel a lot, and frequently encounter flight delays. It’s mind boggling difficult to find out where my plane is when it’s delayed via Flighty. This and a few other things, FlightAware gets right.

I feel like Flighty is for rare leisure traveler and FlightAware is for weekly business and/or pilot traveler.

I’ve honestly had better luck with iOS built in flight tracker than Flighty itself.

danpalmer 17 hours ago

Flighty is in a weird place because I'm a rare/leisure traveller and wow Flighty nowhere near reasonably priced for that market.

I used it in free mode when I was on iOS, but it would be ~£10 per trip for something that would improve my life less than a coffee at the airport.

In my opinion they need to aggressively cut costly features (like weather data), and if they have different international data feeds, perhaps do region locked pricing. I don't fly to the US much, so let me buy a Europe and Asia subscription and skip the US costs. Or vice-versa. It would have needed to be ~£10 a year at most.

bombcar 17 hours ago

zeroonetwothree 14 hours ago

joezydeco 17 hours ago

Flighty routinely tells me about cancelled flights before any other app or the airline itself.

trillic 17 hours ago

lelandbatey 17 hours ago

I agree, I find that the "MiseryMap" from flightaware is less "pretty" but much more informationally dense. https://www.flightaware.com/miserymap/

annexrichmond 17 hours ago

I don’t get why they get so much praise for design with such a big design flaw:

If a flight is delayed even 1 minute, it’s highlighted as red text. This throws me off every time.

Google does not this. It still shows as green if it’s just a few minutes delayed.

I’ve reported this to the Flighty team and they ignored me so I can only assume they think this is a good idea, and I will therefore never pay for their app.

gaintchicken 17 hours ago

Fascinating, I was struck by the exact opposite. The text overflowed the search bar, the bottom table was difficult to read, the airports all just kind of pulsed brown every couple seconds, I assumed this was a slopped together weekend project someone was advertising here.

sefrost 16 hours ago

This web app has very little design-wise in common with the iOS app. It doesn’t even serve the same use case.

They’ve hurt their brand here really, which is a high quality native app experience that makes sense of a lot of granular data from different sources.

jryio 17 hours ago

I am commenting on the entire app experience on iOS not a single web app they released today (which unfortunately is what can be linked on HN).

Read the other comments and you'll see the same, download the iOS app and use that as your basis for commenting.

enraged_camel 16 hours ago

jesterson 18 hours ago

I wish the data would be more reliable (or they have better sanity checks) though. One of my flights suddenly "departed" one hour+ before scheduled time. I almost got heart attack.

Needless to say there were no objective reasons for that - airport dashboard was showing proper time and flight departed with 30min delay (displayed by Flighty as 1.5hr delay).

ezfe 18 hours ago

I've never seen what you describe but I have seen other data issues. It usually depends on the airline, the same types of problems occur with the same airlines.

I've asked and they say there's little they can do, the airlines systems are broadcasting this data and some airlines are better at it than others.

jesterson 15 hours ago

amiantos 16 hours ago

Why can't you just like an app, why do you have to turn it into a personal statement about your dislike of AI? If AI was not involved, why bring it up?

jryio 16 hours ago

I imagine you live your life contextually, whereby your daily experiences are felt against the backdrop of the immediate events you, then your community, and eventually the world at large. If the rest of the world was involved, why not bring it up?

enraged_camel 16 hours ago

Atalocke 16 hours ago

OP makes a good point. No vibe coded app could do this. AI grants productivity. Not taste, wisdom, or talent.

Gagarin1917 17 hours ago

Challenge accepted

xattt 18 hours ago

The bubble fonts are a little too cheery for something as stressful as flight delays.