Finnish sauna heat exposure induces stronger immune cell than cytokine responses (tandfonline.com)

242 points by Growtika 6 hours ago

csr86 5 hours ago

In Finland we have old saying: "If liquor, tar and sauna won’t help, an illness is fatal"

KellyCriterion 2 hours ago

Is it true that new houses are constructed/architectured as "sauna first" and then everything else is planned around the sauna?

or is that just an urban legend claim?

jedberg 4 minutes ago

I have no idea if that claim is true, but what I did love about visiting Finland was the even the small apartment I rented had a sauna in it! It seems like it's a non-negotiable for even the smallest accommodations.

silvertaza 14 minutes ago

Not around the sauna per se, but sauna is often built first because it serves as a place to live while you're building the house!

ascii0eks84 an hour ago

While it's true something like 90% of the accomodation have a sauna it's not like everything is planned around it. It's more like that it's the ONLY well soundproofed space, with nice atmosphere, that makes life enjoyable when your neighbors suck.

incognito_robot 2 hours ago

Trust your instincts.

pimeys 3 hours ago

I would say booze rather than liquor. Liquor sounds too fancy.

amelius an hour ago

Are there any scientific results showing that this helps?

brightball 5 hours ago

Tar?

csr86 5 hours ago

"Tar, acclaimed to have been formed from the sweat of Väinämöinen, a central character from the Finnish national epic Kalevala, was an important medicament to the former-day Finns. Tar actually did bear antiseptic features, which worked as a cure for infections. Lately tar has been recognised to include parts that can cause cancer, and the European Union has urged that its use should be avoided." [1]

I personally dont know how tar was used for health, but it was big export item of Finland during medieval times.

[1]https://www.helsinkitimes.fi/themes/themes/health-a-wellbein...

xattt 3 hours ago

anjel 3 hours ago

throwup238 3 hours ago

pimlottc 43 minutes ago

raverbashing 4 hours ago

lrasinen 5 hours ago

Tar. Specifically wood tar,

jimmySixDOF 5 hours ago

sollewitt 4 hours ago

Pine sap. You can get a schnapps of it, obviously.

ascii0eks84 an hour ago

Not the tapes, tar pit tar, the black thingy used in boats. And now that I read what's the translation it seems to be asphalt actually.

cue_the_strings 5 hours ago

All of these studies are always performed by Finns (or SE / DK / NO + maybe Russia).

I'd love to see this (and other sauna studies) replicated by someone somewhere to the south or hotter climates in general (southern Europe, Africa, hotter parts of Asia and the Americas).

gjulianm an hour ago

I doubt they would replicate it or any of the magical effects of saunas. Lots of the sauna studies suffer from the same issue where people self-report sauna usage rather than being assigned randomly to a treatment group. In countries where saunas are readily accessible and most people are under the impression that the more you use sauna the healthier you are, the ones that use the sauna less are probably because they tolerate it far worse. And that's probably related with age, comorbidities, physical condition, etc.

Basically, the sauna studies are probably mostly discovering that "healthier people can stand sauna longer". In countries where most people don't stand sauna for more than a few minutes, that self-selection bias won't exist.

helsinkiandrew 3 hours ago

There’s a saying in Finland that foreign "saunas" are not true saunas at all, but rather just "untypically warm rooms".

The experiments where at 73°C which is a lot hotter than most gym/hotel/spa saunas I’ve been in outside Finland

tauntz 41 minutes ago

As an Estonian, anything below 80°C is considered a "kids sauna". 80°C - 90°C is a cold-but-workable sauna and proper sauna starts from 90+°C. I'd assume it's the same in Finland as we share a lot of the sauna culture.

omnimus 26 minutes ago

ttiurani 3 hours ago

Also while 73°C is a proper sauna, there are plenty of hotter ones. 90°C is closer to what I'm used to at my apartment building's common sauna. I do take two breaks when I'm there for 30 mims though.

KellyCriterion 2 hours ago

73° hot?

Here in mainland Europe, a "classic fin sauna" is usually at least 90°++

yeahforsureman an hour ago

kikimora an hour ago

Anything beyond 90 C is not a sauna :) Better to have 90+ and hot steam as in Russian sauna (banya) :)

ludicrousdispla 2 hours ago

you can sous vide beef and pork at a lower temperature than that

koolba 2 hours ago

sumea 2 hours ago

And also replicated with participants not used to high temperatures inside a typical Finnish sauna. As the study said such people are very difficult to find in Finland. But I wonder if a person who has never been to a real sauna would tolerate this study protocol (2*15 min at 73° Celsius) without any training.

Sauna and hot climates may sound counterintuitive, but it has been tested by most Finns that when you come out of a hot sauna any outside temperature feels cool.

piva00 39 minutes ago

I'm an immigrant in Scandinavia, originally from a hot country, in my experience a 73C steam sauna is quite tolerable for a 2*15 min session.

The first time I was in a sauna after moving was a bit harder than after getting used to it but doable.

Nowadays I just love them, my friends and I built a couple of saunas to leave by the lake in their summerhouses, the cravings of going from hot -> very cold, and back to the heat is hard to explain, and I totally recommend it.

usrnm 5 hours ago

Ever heard of hamam?

thesz 3 hours ago

Hammam is not as hot as sauna and not as dry. Sauna's air temperatures can reach above 100 degress Celsius and humidity is usually relatively low (around 20%).

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sauna

Hammam's temperatures are around 40-50 degrees Celsius and humidity is close to 100%.

These are very different conditions, with very different body response.

gjulianm an hour ago

KellyCriterion 2 hours ago

dafelst 4 hours ago

I have not, what is it?

alphager 4 hours ago

Jensson 5 hours ago

It is hard to study this in a place with less access to saunas.

dafelst 4 hours ago

Saunas are very cheap to buy and/or build, certainly within the budget of an average research grant.

hattmall 5 hours ago

>mitigate the adverse effects of low socioeconomic status

Makes me wonder how much of it is Sauna, vs just the luxury of having the time to go do nothing for ~30 minutes.

Sharlin 5 hours ago

I just cannot fathom comments like this. I’m preeetty sure that the vast majority of people spend half an hour a day doing nothing, in front of a screen of some type. How many people do you think there are there who don’t have thirty minutes of leisure time once per week?!

lxgr 5 hours ago

There's a world of a difference between being able to carve out 30 actually uninterrupted minutes (and realistically more; most people don't have a sauna in their home, so they'd need to spend some time getting there and back) and being able to zone out and stare at a screen for 30 minutes in bed or on public transit.

Jensson 5 hours ago

Sharlin 4 hours ago

ptero 3 hours ago

neves 3 hours ago

Tade0 5 hours ago

Fresh parents without relatives to help out.

Maxion a minute ago

Mashimo 4 hours ago

prepend 4 hours ago

wiseowise 4 hours ago

Are you even living if you're not spending every single minute breathing and shitting your work and/or kids?

pkilgore 2 hours ago

You "cannot fathom" the privilege your have or life experience you lack to believe this unconditionally.

ugiox 5 hours ago

Less doomscrolling, less bing watching of dumb Netflix series. Sensible working hours. And a society that doesn’t demand constant reachability when being off work.

It is not a luxury. It is living with common sense.

gjulianm an hour ago

That might have an effect, but these studies are probably mostly selecting for people who can tolerate a hostile environment for longer, which are usually healthier. I find it unlikely that sauna alone explains the fantastic, almost miraculous hazard ratios that these studies report.

nobodyandproud 3 hours ago

As an American: I soak in a hot tub for 30 minutes or more, at fairly high heat. At least a few times a week.

Sometimes posting on Hackernews.

It’s one of the high points of my day (the soak, not the posting).

This “I wonder” just screams lazy thinking.

KellyCriterion 2 hours ago

just make sure your charger is faaar away from the tube, please. (and thats also true for your phone charger :-)

nobodyandproud 2 hours ago

cwillu an hour ago

u1hcw9nx 5 hours ago

Doing nothing for 30 minutes does not release cytokines.

choult 4 hours ago

But it _will_ reduce cortisol, which is known to increase the likelihood of infections

bloqs 5 hours ago

I nearly made a screen time comment but you are right, its facility availability and travel time issue more than anything

Jensson 5 hours ago

Finland has saunas everywhere, having a sauna at home isn't even expensive average people have that, its just a cultural thing its like having a toilet at home it isn't something normal people can't afford.

t-3 4 hours ago

nine_k 5 hours ago

No travel time. Most Finnish houses have a sauna built in.

wood_spirit 4 hours ago

azan_ 4 hours ago

People with high socioeconomic status work much more and have less free time. It’s absurd to claim otherwise.

EDIT: please before being outraged at my comment have a look at actual evidence, e.g. Time and income poverty by Tania Burchardt; bottom decile compared with top decile has 12 hours more free time a week!

alphager 4 hours ago

People with 2 minimum wage jobs have even less time.

swiftcoder 3 hours ago

> People with high socioeconomic status work much more and have less free time

I think you are misrepresenting (or perhaps, misunderstanding) the conclusion of these studies. The increased "free time" is most entirely due to high unemployment at the lower end of income.

If you control for unemployment and under-employment, the graphs pretty much flatten out (as you can observe in the later graphs of the publication you linked below)

azan_ 3 hours ago

shadowpho 4 hours ago

Citation needed.

Edit: it’s absolutely not true universally and it’s ridiculous to suggest it is. Comparing averages will be very tricky as well.

azan_ 3 hours ago

robertfw 4 hours ago

how utterly disconnected from reality you are

azan_ 3 hours ago

moltar 4 hours ago

Anecdotal evidence. But since I started doing sauna regularly (once a week) I started to get sick less. I’m talking colds or flues. And the ones I did catch were much milder. Even with sick family members around I’m not catching it as often.

Towaway69 an hour ago

It’s also great for certain mental health issues: spending time naked with a mixed crowd (yes mixed female and male) can be eye opening.

Saunas are a great leveller between humans all living the same experience yet feeling alone in doing so.

MaxikCZ an hour ago

I heard that we often get cold/flu/sore throat when we get too cold outside, because the inside of our orifices is kept at a certain temperature to kill those bacteria/viruses. When we get too cold, we are unable to kill them fast enough, and get overrun. Staying in 70-100°C air for prolonged time must also heatshock those parts of our bodies, so I guess we kinda sterilize it that way.

At least my 2c why I think its helping

mikeodds 3 hours ago

+1

gchamonlive 5 hours ago

> A total of 51 adults (...) were exposed to a 30-minute session of acute FSB at a temperature of + 73°C

Woah, that seems like a lot for me. I can usually stand maybe 60ºC for like 10 maybe 15 min. I don't think I'd be able to stand 30 min under 73ºC.

out_of_protocol 5 hours ago

Humidity is the key, Finnish style sauna is low humidity+ high temperature (85-115C is OK i think), while Russian banya-style is low temperature (60-80C with high humidity). Both of them produce about the same load on a human

orthoxerox 4 hours ago

Right, and Turkish-style hammam is 50C at 100% humidity. It's the only one I cannot stand.

sersi 4 hours ago

gchamonlive 4 hours ago

That's interesting. I don't have much the habit of doing sauna, as you can likely tell, so I might have tried only high humidity saunas. I'll give it a try one day with low humidity if I find one.

albertzeyer 5 hours ago

73°C is a bit unusual cold for a Finnish sauna. Wikipedia says:

> The temperature in Finnish saunas is 80 to 110 °C (176 to 230 °F), usually 80–90 °C (176–194 °F)

And with that temperature, I think 10–15 minutes are pretty standard.

kepeko 4 hours ago

73°C isn't unusual. I checked out what's source for the Wikipedia article that says it's 80 to 110°C. Oddly it's a Chicago Tribune article from 1970. I don't think I ever visited a 110°C sauna.

jaen 3 hours ago

weird-eye-issue 5 hours ago

I was in a 110C sauna for 20 minutes today. Plus 15 minutes in a 70C one (hybrid infrared sauna). Max is 30 minutes at once at 70C. It does take some getting used to.

RakField 4 hours ago

This is one of the most famous public saunas in Finland: https://www.kotiharjunsauna.fi/en

If the temperature there is not close to 120°C, we are kind of disappointed.

KellyCriterion 2 hours ago

This temperature cheating is one of the things I see very often in Gyms & public places: They announce with "fin sauna 90°", and then its only 80 or 82,so stealing some performance :-D

jaen 3 hours ago

It's a multi-level sauna though, so it's "choose-your-own-temperature" (due to the hot air gradient), not everybody is there for the 120C experience.

SoftTalker 4 hours ago

The sauna at my gym is regularly over 180F and I do 30 minute sessions. It is a dry sauna however, no steam.

WhatsTheBigIdea 5 hours ago

I wager you are not Finnish.

mndgs 4 hours ago

Not even a wager. Just out of ~100C sauna after 20 mins straight. Pretty normal, and I'm not Finnish. In that area though.

gchamonlive 4 hours ago

Brazilian! XD

hbarka 3 hours ago

I’m not sure if I want a response of cytokine storms. MCAS is what comes to mind.

theptip 12 minutes ago

IIUC the operating theory is that a short burst of acute inflammatory stimulus clears out the system to below the prior baseline.

cpncrunch 2 hours ago

Its not a storm though.

bilsbie 5 hours ago

I’ve always wondered if it raises internal body temperature? Is it basically an induced fever?

colordrops 5 hours ago

It does indeed increase internal temperature. Perhaps an artificial fever is part of it but I believe the science currently around heat shock proteins.

raffraffraff 4 hours ago

Hmm. So what about a 30 to 50 minute run wearing sweatpants / hoodie?

calf 8 minutes ago

colordrops an hour ago

stevenhubertron 4 hours ago

Sample size is tiny fwiw.

ascii0eks84 an hour ago

Sauna basically is the "hot winter" simulator.

api 5 hours ago

Does a long hot bath do the same?

zemvpferreira 5 hours ago

Yes, if by hot bath you mean submerging yourself to neck level in 40ºC or above water for 20-30 minutes. There's no reason to believe any "heat therapy" modality is superior to another as long as you suffer equal heat stress.

For the record, if you're not acclimated, intense heat exposure is a lot more agonising than 30 minutes of exercise for less benefit. If you haven't experienced a properly tuned sauna in your life you are in for a ride. What's being studied in the literature is nothing like your standard hotel experience.

lxgr 4 hours ago

How are you suffering equal heat stress from being submerged in moderately warm water and breathing very hot air? I could imagine quite different effects on airways and skin, for example. "Exactly the same effect" seems like the unexpected outcome here.

> intense heat exposure is a lot more agonising than 30 minutes of exercise for less benefit

Having to do absolutely nothing other than not leaving is quite different from pushing through a physical activity that can also easily be causing all kinds of discomfort.

r0me1 3 hours ago

zemvpferreira 4 hours ago

out_of_protocol 4 hours ago

Trustable8 5 hours ago

It might not do the exact same, but it will have some effect. A lot of the benefit comes from the raised heart rate and opening of the blood vessels that the sauna produces, and I can expect that a warm bath would also have a similar effect. I think both are also known to reduce stress, which can help to lower blood pressure.

Mistletoe 5 hours ago

If you are a man, the hot water has a deleterious effect on your testicles' ability to make sperm. But so do saunas apparently.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23411620/

That one was 80-90C, which is a really hot sauna.

p1esk 5 hours ago

Just to clarify - it’s a temporary effect - lasts for 3-6 months

orthoxerox 4 hours ago

KellyCriterion 2 hours ago

Aboutplants 4 hours ago

andy_ppp 5 hours ago

Almost certainly but most people don’t find it as enjoyable. Also the problem of keeping the bath hot enough for 20-30 mins.

weird-eye-issue 5 hours ago

Hot tub, onsen, etc...