Rockstar Games Hacked, Hackers Threaten a Massive Data Leak If Not Paid Ransom (kotaku.com)
59 points by c420 4 hours ago
embedding-shape 2 hours ago
> “Rockstar Games, your Snowflake instances were compromised thanks to Anodot.com. Pay or leak. This is a final warning to reach out by 14 Apr 2026 before we leak, along with several annoying (digital) problems that’ll come your way. Make the right decision, don’t be the next headline.”
Anyone familiar with "Snowflake" enough to say what sort of data was typically hosted there? Judging by the website and the lack of specifics about the data, I'm guessing it's less about assets, artifacts and stuff like that, and more about financial data and general/generic "business" stuff?
Maxion 2 hours ago
In my experienced Snowflake is often used as a data warehouse.
tempaccount5050 an hour ago
I've seen companies literally mirror every piece of data they have in snowflake to do AI/analytics stuff. There's probably a lot of of shit in there.
hilariously 2 hours ago
It's a database, but you could store basically any OLAP type things there, all your stuff for aggregate customer data for instance.
embedding-shape 2 hours ago
Sure, but some databases are sold/bought more by brand recognition and for the type of data rather than actual technical capabilities. Don't ask me why, just very familiar with people making those sort of choices.
ziml77 34 minutes ago
Snowflake is typically used for data analytics in my experience. It's going to have financial stuff very likely, but not like raw documents. Definitely not source code.
I mean technically you can stuff documents into a column with the BINARY datatype provided they are under 67 MB each, but it's not really meant to be used as a document store.
cbg0 3 hours ago
Update: 4/11/26, 11:45 a.m. ET: Rockstar Games confirmed that a data breach has happened. A spokesperson sent over this statement to Kotaku:
“We can confirm that a limited amount of non-material company information was accessed in connection with a third-party data breach. This incident has no impact on our organization or our players.”
plmpsu 2 hours ago
That's what I would say regardless of if I was considering paying or not.
chistev 2 hours ago
Coincidentally and Interestingly, again, I was reading an old thread from 2015 titled - ProtonMail pays $6k ransom, gets taken out by DDoS anyway
The top comment says -
"NEVER EVER PAY RANSOM MONEY. Please. Even if your business will suffer it will suffer a lot more if you do pay since now it is known you'll cave. Also: you are making the problem larger for others."
The top response to that comment says -
"From their blog: https://protonmaildotcom.wordpress.com/ At around 2PM, the attackers began directly attacking the infrastructure of our upstream providers and the datacenter itself. The coordinated assault on our ISP exceeded 100Gbps and attacked not only the datacenter, but also routers in Zurich, Frankfurt, and other locations where our ISP has nodes. This coordinated assault on key infrastructure eventually managed to bring down both the datacenter and the ISP, which impacted hundreds of other companies, not just ProtonMail.
At this point, we were placed under a lot of pressure by third parties to just pay the ransom, which we grudgingly agreed to do at 3:30PM Geneva time to the bitcoin address 1FxHcZzW3z9NRSUnQ9Pcp58ddYaSuN1T2y. This was a collective decision taken by all impacted companies, and while we disagree with it, we nevertheless respected it taking into the consideration the hundreds of thousands of Swiss Francs in damages suffered by other companies caught up in the attack against us. We hoped that by paying, we could spare the other companies impacted by the attack against us, but the attacks continued nevertheless. This was clearly a wrong decision so let us be clear to all future attackers – ProtonMail will NEVER pay another ransom. "
Full thread here -
ronsor 2 hours ago
Most hackers actually keep their promises if paid the ransom, nowadays.
It sounds perverse but the incentives require it: if payment didn't bring resolution, no one would pay. As a result, all of the big gangs avoid scamming.
mh- an hour ago
That was the state of play in 2015 as well. In the absence of a claim from the group otherwise, I wouldn't be surprised if they simply couldn't get it to stop (on a technical level.)
Way back when, it was a pretty common screwup to accidentally saturate the nodes you were packeting from. So then your C&C couldn't get them to respond, either. Oops.
nicce 2 hours ago
Yeah, this business is based on actually delivering the promise.
2OEH8eoCRo0 18 minutes ago
The point is that by paying you incentivize it and make it worthwhile not that the hackers keep promises.
chistev an hour ago
That makes sense. They should pay, then.
rundigen12 3 hours ago
I honestly expected the demand to be "Release GTA 6 soon or else we will". ...The fact that they're just demanding money is a little disappointing. ;-)
gloxkiqcza 2 hours ago
Many ransomware groups of today operate in the same way a legal tech startup would. It’s a large organization with clear goals, not just some guys fooling around. It’s a funny thought tho.
specialist an hour ago
How do laypersons (noobs) like me learn about this stuff? Like Wired magazine technical level.
I've just started Darknet Diaries podcast. So great.
When I worked on electronic medical records, I assumed it was just a matter of time until we were hacked (too). All the most banal reasons: many vendors, shared passwords, root/admin access, etc.
I imagine things haven't improved much since.
robotburrito 2 hours ago
Yeah but large tech companies don’t just operate by breaking laws like this.
potsandpans an hour ago
luqtas 2 hours ago
EA-3167 an hour ago
seydor 2 hours ago
How fitting with their games. They should include the hackers in GTA7
bsimpson 23 minutes ago
Holy shit - according to the same article, an autistic teen last hacked them and was sentenced to life in an asylum!
mschuster91 2 hours ago
Please, please let that leak be the source code of GTA SA :D
gaythread 3 hours ago
Do we not have GTA5 source already?
bakugo 3 hours ago
Yes, but GTA5 leaked a decade after its release. Rockstar didn't really suffer any significant damage from it.
If 6 leaks before release, though, that's a completely different story. I can imagine them actually paying a ransom if that happened.
dvratil 2 hours ago
Maybe I'm missing something, but how would GTA6 source leak really harm Rockstar? I mean it's unlikely it would be possible to compile a full working game from the leak, and even if so, it's such a non-trivial task, that I don't believe it would hurt sales /that/ much.
The only thing I can imagine is the story would get spoiled on the internet, but that's about it.
mh- an hour ago
mgol94 an hour ago
eugenekolo an hour ago
..again?