Internet outage in Iran reaches 1,008 hours (mastodon.social)

132 points by miadabdi 8 hours ago

BariumBlue 6 hours ago

Apparently there have been IRGC and basij curfew patrols shooting at buildings / windows of people who sing or shout anti regime songs and slogans. Apparently they are also (at least in some cases) dressing as women to avoid airstrikes. There has been very little photage and info coming out of Iran though.

I still believe the Iranian government is more afraid of it's people than of the US and Israel - the US and Israel can bomb leadership and materiel, but without ground troops, regime capitulation is unlikely, unless the populace can themselves overthrow the govt (though that is hard to do when there is a major imbalance in who has guns).

nitwit005 9 minutes ago

This is just spreading rumors. You have to do better than "apparently".

jncfhnb 5 hours ago

This is all likely true. Although I feel people undersell how they work together.

Iranians broadly hate their government, yeah. But the thing that gets them rioting is economic failure. Which the strikes have exacerbated.

Social media is swarmed by people saying it’ll be like Iraq and Iranians will hate the US for its actions. I’m not convinced. My small anecdata of Iranian friends with contacts in Iran agrees with me.

I think we could see regime change within a decade.

throwawayheui57 4 hours ago

> But the thing that gets them rioting is economic failure

I believe Iranians want to be able to decide their own fate, with the dignity that all humans deserve. Without criminal domestic religious zealots and without foreign meddling and bombing.

The previous protest was followed by the killing of Mahsa Amini, in morality police’s custody because of improper hijab. It’s not only economic hardships. But you’re right that war has made the situation worse, obviously.

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/10/iran-at-least...

breppp 3 hours ago

> But the thing that gets them rioting is economic failure. Which the strikes have exacerbated.

Past riots were related to women rights or election fraud. The last one were related to the economic situation, but there is a large young population in Iran which aren't religious anymore, and living in an oppressive theocracy

iso1631 2 hours ago

maest 4 hours ago

> I’m not convinced. My small anecdata of Iranian friends with contacts in Iran agrees with me.

I am having a very hard time believing anyone would be favourable to the country currently lobbing bombs at them from halfway around the globe. Regardless of how much they dislike their current regime.

Maybe this fuels some "everyone loves America, the good guys" fantasy, but, as someone who's come from a country where the people did not like the regime, I am very skeptical foreign interference will be seen positively or even neutrally.

Or maybe this is an attempt at making the war seem somehow just and led on humanitarian and democratic principles, as opposed to what it actually is.

e-khadem 3 hours ago

jncfhnb 3 hours ago

nixon_why69 4 hours ago

If Israel and America can keep it in their pants and stop bombing civilians.. then yeah the government is very unpopular.

If.

inglor_cz 4 hours ago

cineticdaffodil 3 hours ago

But the vector under a theocratic government constantly points towards failure. So you have one known vector thats disaster and one unknown vector that just mightbbe disaster.. if in doubt throw the dice ?

cpncrunch 5 hours ago

Why wont a general strike work? Not enough support? People have never had freedom, so dont understand they have 100% ability to bring down govt if they wanted?

payamb 5 hours ago

jncfhnb 3 hours ago

bjourne an hour ago

My small anecdata of Iranian friends contradict yours. They are against both the US-Israeli bombings and the Islamic regime. How should be decide whose anecdata is the most trustworthy? Maybe we can use common sense instead and agree that people don't want to be bombed to death regardless of other circumstances?

BigTTYGothGF 3 hours ago

> Apparently they are also (at least in some cases) dressing as women to avoid airstrikes

Didn't help anybody in Minab.

mdni007 an hour ago

Can you provide a source for any of this that is not just American or Isreali propaganda? Because I know you can't

beloch 2 hours ago

When a regime starts killing thousands of it's own people it's a sign of weakness, not strength. Iran's theocracy was teetering above the abyss before the U.S. started bombing them.

Now, they're probably good to go for a couple more decades. Trump is precisely the kind of threat Iranians have been warned about since the revolution. When a regime spends almost half a century preparing for something and it finally happens, it earns them considerable forgiveness. Also, nothing unites people quite like a foreign threat, especially one dumb enough to bomb schoolgirls in its opening salvo.

By scuttling the JCPOA for no apparent reason and now invading Iran right when it appeared the regime was crumbling, Trump has single-handedly reinvigorated Iran's theocracy and given them the public support they need for the final push towards nuclear weapons. That's what's so sickening about this invasion. It has acted in diametric opposition to the the policy goals it was purportedly pursuing.

pcf 4 hours ago

Every Iranian I know support the current US/Israeli war against the Islamic Republic.

They say things like "no matter what it takes, no matter how many of us die, we must be free again, this time we will win against the terrorist regime" (paraphrased).

hgoel 3 hours ago

Are these Iranian friends and their children the ones at risk the next time the US or Israel "accidentally" double taps civilian infrastructure?

The regime will kill you/your loved ones and brand them as criminals if you protest against them or break an unreasonable law, the US and Israel will kill you and brand you as terrorists because you happened to be Iranian and in the wrong place.

y-c-o-m-b 3 hours ago

My family in Tehran fear the bombs but support the US continuing to do so. I think the bombing campaign needs to end, so I disagree with them on that. Based on what little we know coming out of Tehran (we only get a few min of landline phone calls from Tehran once a week), the issue is splitting families due to the mental strain it's having. That being said, the overall feeling is very much still pro-US.

I think people outside of Iran/Iranians vastly underestimate the disdain for the Iranian regime. Go watch the movie "It was just an accident" to get a basic feel for how much they hate the regime, then amplify that tenfold.

hgoel 3 hours ago

breppp 3 hours ago

If you look at the chances, there's a far greater chance of dying in the hands of SUV mounted machine guns firing at crowds than precision bombs that mostly hit regime forces

epicureanideal 3 hours ago

throwawayheui57 3 hours ago

Iranian here! I want to see the regime answer for its crimes. They act like an occupying force, taking the country hostage.

With that being said I don’t like/want the war. I understand and sympathize with the emotional response from my compatriots because they see the oppressors are getting the bloody beating they well deserve. But I don’t really think that the current war brings anything good for the people. I wish it did but it doesn’t look like it. I wish the regime would fall but they haven’t and we now have ~2000 more innocents dead on top of thousands that government killed in January.

YZF 2 hours ago

I am guessing you're not a supported of Reza Pahlavi?

How in your mind do we get to the regime answering for its crimes? What is going to dislodge them? If they are not dislodged and continue to indoctrinate more people where does this go? If they have more weapons where does it go?

Is any chance that some elements within the current regime will change sides? What percent of soldiers or militia are die hard fanatics vs. people who will jump ship if there's a good chance of that "ship" sinking?

rjbwork 4 hours ago

It's very easy to offer the lives of others for your goals.

blitzar 3 hours ago

"Some of you May Die, But it's a Sacrifice I am Willing to Make"

bilbo0s 3 hours ago

In fairness, the claim is that all the Iranians are offering their own lives for the poster's goals.

Of course, that only brings us to, "It's easy to claim others are offering their lives for your goals."

I guess it's probably best to just realize everything you see on the subject of any given war is probably propaganda. And judge the value of it through that lens.

oa335 3 hours ago

That’s interesting; how many of them are currently in Iran or have close family in Iran?

vjvjvjvjghv 4 hours ago

The big question is what comes after. I don't think many disagreed with Saddam or Gaddafi but history shows that this doesn't necessarily lead to good outcomes.

sillyfluke 4 hours ago

It's always good to state if the Iranians you know are currently residing in Iran, for clarity.

Your paraphased quote also implies that there must be actual regime change for the deaths to be worth it (ie, no IRGC).

gambutin 4 hours ago

If only they had internet so that we could ask them!

orangeboats 4 hours ago

It's scary that your 1-minute old comment got insta-downvoted.

0x1ceb00da 3 hours ago

RobotToaster 3 hours ago

It's easy to say that when you're a shah supporter living in the west.

pphysch an hour ago

Do you ever think what would happen to them in the West if they weren't vocal opponents of the Iranian state?

4gotunameagain 3 hours ago

Did you see on the news how many people were mourning for Khomeini on the streets ?

Clearly your sample of Iranians is very biased.

I am not pro theocratic regimes, but not only does the US/Israel _not_ have the right to wage this war, but this war will only make the regime stronger.

Nothing more unifying than getting bombed, especially in martyrdom cultures.

roenxi 3 hours ago

> Every Iranian I know support the current US/Israeli war against the Islamic Republic.

That seems a little bit suspect, how many Iranians do you know? I have difficulty believing that less than around 20-30% of them support the regime. There seems to be a baseline of around that fraction of people who support the status quo.

It isn't so hard to find people who support full-on communism. Any reasonable sample should be turning up a lot of really weird opinions.

gambutin 6 hours ago

Noteworthy: It’s not that no one in Iran has no access. Actually some have internet access via “white SIM cards” (1). Reportedly 50,000 or so.

Essentially, they’ve created a two-tier system controlling who can access the internet.

(1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_SIM_Card

traceroute66 5 hours ago

> Noteworthy: It’s not that no one in Iran has no access. Actually some have internet access via “white SIM cards”

Erm, dude, you did look at the graph on the Mastodon post linked to, right ?

You see that bit where it falls off a cliff to 0% netblocks ?

"white SIM card" or not, you're not getting internet if there's no BGP routes being announced.

The only way around 0 BGP announcements would be satellite...

I suspect your "white SIM card" was a pre-war status-quo ...

payamb 5 hours ago

That’s not the reality. Pro regime “white simcard” people have been spreading their propaganda since start of the war on twitter, instagram and elsewhere.

dmix 4 hours ago

traceroute66 4 hours ago

dataflow 5 hours ago

> Erm, dude, you did look at the graph on the Mastodon post linked to, right ? You see that bit where it falls off a cliff to 0% netblocks ?

Not sure if we're all looking at the same plot, but I see things hovering above zero, not exactly at zero.

0x1ceb00da 3 hours ago

We're receiving war footage from iran. They aren't completely disconnected.

traceroute66 3 hours ago

traceroute66 5 hours ago

Looking at it from an alternative angle, the Iranians are not stupid.

They know leaving the internet online would be beneficial for their adversaries, perhaps especially as Israel is one of them, and Israel's use of cyber is no secret.

So by killing the internet, they have an instant air-gap firewall.

Making the most of the levers they have fighting asymmetric warfare.

jncfhnb 5 hours ago

It’s very economically harmful to be disconnected. That’s the downside

traceroute66 5 hours ago

> It’s very economically harmful to be disconnected. That’s the downside

I mean, sure. But then being at war is also economically harmful. :)

dmix 4 hours ago

amelius 4 hours ago

jncfhnb 5 hours ago

payamb 4 hours ago

It’s proven time and time again that Mossad always find a way to infiltrate into even most secure Iranian network. This is mostly done to control the narrative and keep the pro regime supporters morale up.

traceroute66 4 hours ago

> It’s proven time and time again that Mossad always find a way to infiltrate into even most secure Iranian network.

Sure, but why make their life easier ?

Taking your line of argument, you would also need to say "well, the US are going to bomb us anyway. We might as well just post all the GPS coordinates of sensitive sites up on Twitter".

JohnnyLarue 6 hours ago

Bombing civilian infrastructure didn't turn the Internet back on? I don't believe that.

curiousObject 7 hours ago

That’s unbroken 6 weeks of no direct access for almost everyone

Of course information does still get in and out, but that is severely throttled

aaronbrethorst 3 hours ago

42 days, for anyone else not accustomed to thinking in terms of large numbers of hours.

amir734jj 25 minutes ago

I'm an Iranian American. There is no Internet. Only people who work for the government have limited Internet. We can't call phone numbers in Iran. They can call our phone in the US (they will get a sms or call shortly after ending the call saying that we the government was monitoring the conversation) and these calls are very expensive for them. This situation is not sustainable. There are many businesses in Iran that rely on Internet. Millions of Iranian live outside of the country and haven't been able to talk to their family and friends. Not sure how long will this internet blockade will continue.

UltraSane 44 minutes ago

It isn't an outage it is an intentional block. Iranian ISPs actually stop announcing all IPv4 prefixes into BGP.

reliabilityguy 6 hours ago

Is Iranian infra centralized on the similar fashion like in Belarus?

alephnerd 6 hours ago

It's way more centralized.

Iran has been rolling out the National Information Network (essentially a whitelisted internet) since the Green Revolution [0] back in 2009-12. Iran has a surprisingly robust domestic ecosystem of hyperscalers [1] and telco infra [6][7] built out over the past decade with limited outside involvement and a severe sanctions regime, and have even started exporting Iranian IT services to Uganda [2], Kenya [3], South Africa [4], Venezuela [5], Russia [8], and China [8].

Iran also uses a two-tier SIM card system - ideologically vetted individuals get a "white" SIM which gives full ingress/egress outside the NIN and others have a normal SIM that can be blacklisted from egressing outside the NIN.

Notice how Iranian websites have a page saying "Transferring to Website" - that's the gateway page for the NIN.

[0] - https://citizenlab.ca/irans-national-information-network/

[1] - https://www.arvancloud.ir/fa

[2] - https://tvbrics.com/en/news/uganda-and-iran-to-boost-ict-co-...

[3] - https://mail.techreviewafrica.com/public/news/1361/kenya-and...

[4] - https://www.samenacouncil.org/samena_daily_news?news=64545

[5] - https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2025/08/06/752585/Iranian-fibe...

[6] - https://zmc.co.ir/

[7] - https://www.rayafiber.com/en/home

[8] - https://www.kharon.com/brief/iran-sanctions-maximum-pressure...

gambutin 6 hours ago

Is there a reasonable workaround for this?

alephnerd 6 hours ago

newsclues 5 hours ago

How does internet shutdown affect bitcoin mining in Iran?

alephnerd 5 hours ago

jauntywundrkind 2 hours ago

This is the sort of thing the Arsenal of Democracy should be building against. We should be deploying tools to give people voices in hostile places, to get messages out, to collaborate.

overfeed an hour ago

See age verification, anti-pornography, and anti-VPN laws popping up like weeds all over democratic countries. Governments everywhere are pushing for more control over who and how people communicate over the Internet, so they can mute certain voices without shutting down the internet like Iran when they deem it necessary

metalman 7 hours ago

and during that time those people waging war against Iran, murdered one Irainian child every 30 minuits, not counting the other children murdered by the genociders in Lebanon, Syria, and Palestine.

predictable down vote

but listen up, Iran has made a tactical move in this, but the implication is that they, like Afganistan are consideriing a strategic move, and many others are watching.

more down voting, which is an excellent demonstration of how the internet is used by those that "own" it

ksajadi 4 hours ago

- "Everyone is crazy and the way you can tell they are crazy is to see if they tell me I am wrong".

- "You are wrong! Everyone is not crazy"

- "You see? I told you. Everyone is crazy"

metalman 40 minutes ago

you made me smile, because everyone IS crazy, but many of them are still decent and kind and can see there own crazy enough to make room in the world for others crazyness. and then there are the those who espouse the madness of a genocidal cultic insanity, or perhaps even more distubing, play a cunning game of distraction and apology for murder and hate