Artificial egg hatched 26 healthy chickens (nationalgeographic.com)

63 points by BaudouinVH 3 days ago

dweinus an hour ago

> says Duke University ecologist Stuart Pimm, who was not involved in the research. “We could better help millions of birds every year by solving the more immediate threats of disappearing habitats, collisions with building windows, and prowling outdoor cats,”

Yes. Even if they stuck it at the end, it shows good journalism to call this out.

daniel_iversen 6 hours ago

I've just started listening to the book "Brave new world" (no spoilers please!) and this is literally how the book begins (but with humans) - what could possibly go wrong!

mplanchard 5 hours ago

No spoilers, but I used to think, along the lines of Neil Postman in Amusing Ourselves to Death, that Brave New World wound up being the more accurate picture of future society than 1984, despite being less well-known and referenced in cultural consciousness.

Unfortunately, it seems like the former may be enabling the latter, so we may end up with a “porque no los dos” situation.

JKCalhoun an hour ago

No spoilers, but I've come to think that "Brave New World" actually is Utopian—in the "give people what they want" department.

kombine 5 hours ago

I haven't read Brave New World but "We" by Evgeny Zamyatin left a similar impression on me, it's more subtle than 1984. It came out earlier than both books by the Western authors - even though Zamyatin was inspired while working in England in early 20th century.

detourdog 3 hours ago

EMIRELADERO 3 hours ago

Cassell an hour ago

dimes an hour ago

1984 is a much better book. The writing is beautiful and the story is gripping. For that reason alone, it occupies a larger part of society’s psyche. I agree that many aspects of Brave New World were prescient, but 1984 isn’t entirely inaccurate either.

aaronbrethorst 2 hours ago

1984 was as much (or more) about Stalinism and totalitarian tendencies in 1948 as it was a cautionary tale about the future.

wartywhoa23 2 hours ago

> Brave New World wound up being the more accurate picture of future society than 1984.

The current vector of the world has all the potential to end up in a blend of both.

warumdarum 5 hours ago

Actually.. not much. Education is taken care of. Gestation is taken care of. You grow up your young with a company instead of a family, if you want to be involved at all. All things that could go wrong, already sort of have over the last ten years and have been accordingly ironed out of humanity.

Sexuality as couples is already gone for large parts of the yoynger population. Culturally the family is as good as gone. Woman have kicked themselves enthusiastically out of all roles the species had to offer, except for that of work drone and that is going obsolete right now. They and their allies (almost all of those allies cheer on the ideas of incubators) wildly detest the idea of going back to traditional roles. Society has to come from somewhere and this is somewhere.. nothing of value was lost..

dimes 2 hours ago

Without spoiling anything, I wouldn’t say anything “goes wrong” in Brave New World, at least as far as procreation is concerned.

thunderbong 3 hours ago

ilamont 3 hours ago

Colossal Biosciences has other ongoing projects including reviving the "Red Wolf" using DNA from coyote/wolf hybrids and CRISPR. They also want to introduce a Wooly Mammoth/elephant hybrid.

The company was founded by George Church, and is able to embark upon these projects thanks to deep-pocketed investors and skirting/bypassing traditional approaches aligned with federal programs and the Endangered Species Act. The following MIT Technology Review article covers the wolf project in detail:

https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/04/20/1135222/red-wolv... (paywall)

guerrilla 5 hours ago

The future is getting creepier by the day. You know this'll be used in food farming.

maxerickson 5 hours ago

Why? The current method is cheap.

sghiassy 3 hours ago

Hopefully it changes. Male baby chicks are thrown into grinders. It’s horrendous

zamadatix 3 hours ago

aaronbrethorst 2 hours ago

We already have Soylent

standardUser 3 hours ago

Creating a food system that is more cruel to animals than what we already have is a very high bar. Not that I doubt we can clear it.

margalabargala 2 hours ago

Is that a problem?

tao_oat an hour ago

If you consider factory farming horrific, then yes

margalabargala 31 minutes ago

yewenjie 6 hours ago

Is this a company and not a research lab doing this? What's the economic imperative for funding this?

jfengel 6 hours ago

They're a foundation working on "de extinction". They want to hatch dodos.

Avicebron 6 hours ago

I'm holding out hope we can get the moa birds back in my lifetime.

jaggederest 3 hours ago

hypfer 6 hours ago

Yes, yes. Dodos.

The endgame of this is Dodos.

dandellion 6 hours ago

fontain 6 hours ago

A velociraptor skeleton is worth around $10 million. Hatch a few dozen per year and you’re making great money.

onion2k 5 hours ago

[Colossal Biosciences] has raised over $600 million and carries a valuation exceeding $10 billion.

You're not making a return on that from selling velocirator skeletons. Nor is that sort of money in dodos and maos.

Human cloning on the other hand...

ProblemFactory 3 hours ago

fragmede 5 hours ago

stavros 5 hours ago

FrustratedMonky 6 hours ago

Maybe short term, pumping out chickens. For food.

Long term, maybe chickens are just the test case and they will pump out human slaves. Replicants.

vitally3643 6 hours ago

No. This is a very stupid and uneducated thing to suggest. Do better.

fragmede 5 hours ago

FrustratedMonky 5 hours ago

lekevicius 5 hours ago

I always knew that egg came first.

andy99 5 hours ago

  requires real hen for fertilization and laying

paul_ny 5 hours ago

Huh… from the original Nat Geo article:

  scientists inspect eggs newly laid by real hens within 24 to 48 hours. They select the most promising ones, crack them open, and delicately pour the contents—everything but the shell—into the artificial egg structure. But everything that happened before then, from fertilization to egg laying, required a real chicken.

deadbabe an hour ago

How will they resurrect a dodo? Is the idea that they have some DNA somewhere?

goda90 an hour ago

The Wikipedia article suggests they do: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodo

downrightmike 38 minutes ago

WE have one leg from one individual, and so egg fragments, should be doable, but not enough diversity

bushwart 5 hours ago

life finds a way

eutropia 5 hours ago

  Colossal Biosciences
and its

  goal of resurrecting extinct bird species
"bird species"?

C'mon.

They want to do a Jurassic Park.

yjftsjthsd-h 3 hours ago

Baby steps:)

cbdevidal 2 hours ago

Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could…

jeroenvlek 5 hours ago

Am I the only one wondering if it's 26 chickens at once from a single artificial egg or they just succeeded 26 times with different eggs? Rationally it probably has to be the latter, but the title confuses me.

dag100 4 hours ago

You could RTFA and find out.

(26 different artificial eggs. The artificial egg is the main development. Basically they take a chicken embryo (by cracking open a fertilized egg) and allow it to develop inside the artificial egg, and from which it can eventually be "hatched". Other methods for growing chickens from embryos outside their eggs have not had very high success rates.)

jeroenvlek 3 hours ago

Yeah..., or you could read the rest of the comment section and learn that I have RTFA, but that TFA was changed with one that explains it better:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257929

This was what I read: https://colossal.com/colossal-biosciences-artificial-egg-dod...

VladVladikoff 6 hours ago

This article is so strange. It is written by the company, but written in a way that an outsider would write.

> Colossal has not released its hatch rate for the 26 chickens, which limits direct comparison to prior shell-free systems. The announcement was also made without an accompanying peer-reviewed paper or publicly released dataset, meaning independent scientists have not yet been able to evaluate the underlying methodology.

x-yl 6 hours ago

It says at the bottom:

> This story is based on original reporting by Christina Larson for National Geographic. Read the full feature on National Geographic

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/artificia...

dang 4 hours ago

Ok, we've switched the URL to that link from https://colossal.com/colossal-biosciences-artificial-egg-dod... above. Thanks!

mr_toad 6 hours ago

Press releases are often written for lazy publications to copy and paste.

greatgib 6 hours ago

Also, that is the kind of corporate PR articles that are made to be quasi copy/pasted by journalists.

bookofjoe 6 hours ago

For a sec there I thought the National Enquirer had gotten a new lease on life.

paul_ny 5 hours ago

So, this means the egg came first, right?

unfitted2545 5 hours ago

Eggs are IaC.

iwontberude 6 hours ago

Have we already forgotten about chaos theory?

jfengel 6 hours ago

For a book/movie with a decent (if optimistic) grasp of genetics, its grasp of chaos theory was utterly ignorant.