Artificial egg hatched 26 healthy chickens (nationalgeographic.com)
63 points by BaudouinVH 3 days ago
dweinus an hour ago
> says Duke University ecologist Stuart Pimm, who was not involved in the research. “We could better help millions of birds every year by solving the more immediate threats of disappearing habitats, collisions with building windows, and prowling outdoor cats,”
Yes. Even if they stuck it at the end, it shows good journalism to call this out.
daniel_iversen 6 hours ago
I've just started listening to the book "Brave new world" (no spoilers please!) and this is literally how the book begins (but with humans) - what could possibly go wrong!
mplanchard 5 hours ago
No spoilers, but I used to think, along the lines of Neil Postman in Amusing Ourselves to Death, that Brave New World wound up being the more accurate picture of future society than 1984, despite being less well-known and referenced in cultural consciousness.
Unfortunately, it seems like the former may be enabling the latter, so we may end up with a “porque no los dos” situation.
JKCalhoun an hour ago
No spoilers, but I've come to think that "Brave New World" actually is Utopian—in the "give people what they want" department.
kombine 5 hours ago
I haven't read Brave New World but "We" by Evgeny Zamyatin left a similar impression on me, it's more subtle than 1984. It came out earlier than both books by the Western authors - even though Zamyatin was inspired while working in England in early 20th century.
detourdog 3 hours ago
EMIRELADERO 3 hours ago
Cassell an hour ago
dimes an hour ago
1984 is a much better book. The writing is beautiful and the story is gripping. For that reason alone, it occupies a larger part of society’s psyche. I agree that many aspects of Brave New World were prescient, but 1984 isn’t entirely inaccurate either.
aaronbrethorst 2 hours ago
1984 was as much (or more) about Stalinism and totalitarian tendencies in 1948 as it was a cautionary tale about the future.
wartywhoa23 2 hours ago
> Brave New World wound up being the more accurate picture of future society than 1984.
The current vector of the world has all the potential to end up in a blend of both.
warumdarum 5 hours ago
Actually.. not much. Education is taken care of. Gestation is taken care of. You grow up your young with a company instead of a family, if you want to be involved at all. All things that could go wrong, already sort of have over the last ten years and have been accordingly ironed out of humanity.
Sexuality as couples is already gone for large parts of the yoynger population. Culturally the family is as good as gone. Woman have kicked themselves enthusiastically out of all roles the species had to offer, except for that of work drone and that is going obsolete right now. They and their allies (almost all of those allies cheer on the ideas of incubators) wildly detest the idea of going back to traditional roles. Society has to come from somewhere and this is somewhere.. nothing of value was lost..
dimes 2 hours ago
Without spoiling anything, I wouldn’t say anything “goes wrong” in Brave New World, at least as far as procreation is concerned.
thunderbong 3 hours ago
ilamont 3 hours ago
Colossal Biosciences has other ongoing projects including reviving the "Red Wolf" using DNA from coyote/wolf hybrids and CRISPR. They also want to introduce a Wooly Mammoth/elephant hybrid.
The company was founded by George Church, and is able to embark upon these projects thanks to deep-pocketed investors and skirting/bypassing traditional approaches aligned with federal programs and the Endangered Species Act. The following MIT Technology Review article covers the wolf project in detail:
https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/04/20/1135222/red-wolv... (paywall)
guerrilla 5 hours ago
The future is getting creepier by the day. You know this'll be used in food farming.
maxerickson 5 hours ago
Why? The current method is cheap.
sghiassy 3 hours ago
Hopefully it changes. Male baby chicks are thrown into grinders. It’s horrendous
zamadatix 3 hours ago
aaronbrethorst 2 hours ago
We already have Soylent
standardUser 3 hours ago
Creating a food system that is more cruel to animals than what we already have is a very high bar. Not that I doubt we can clear it.
margalabargala 2 hours ago
Is that a problem?
tao_oat an hour ago
If you consider factory farming horrific, then yes
margalabargala 31 minutes ago
yewenjie 6 hours ago
Is this a company and not a research lab doing this? What's the economic imperative for funding this?
jfengel 6 hours ago
They're a foundation working on "de extinction". They want to hatch dodos.
Avicebron 6 hours ago
I'm holding out hope we can get the moa birds back in my lifetime.
jaggederest 3 hours ago
hypfer 6 hours ago
Yes, yes. Dodos.
The endgame of this is Dodos.
dandellion 6 hours ago
fontain 6 hours ago
A velociraptor skeleton is worth around $10 million. Hatch a few dozen per year and you’re making great money.
onion2k 5 hours ago
[Colossal Biosciences] has raised over $600 million and carries a valuation exceeding $10 billion.
You're not making a return on that from selling velocirator skeletons. Nor is that sort of money in dodos and maos.
Human cloning on the other hand...
ProblemFactory 3 hours ago
fragmede 5 hours ago
stavros 5 hours ago
FrustratedMonky 6 hours ago
Maybe short term, pumping out chickens. For food.
Long term, maybe chickens are just the test case and they will pump out human slaves. Replicants.
vitally3643 6 hours ago
No. This is a very stupid and uneducated thing to suggest. Do better.
fragmede 5 hours ago
FrustratedMonky 5 hours ago
lekevicius 5 hours ago
I always knew that egg came first.
andy99 5 hours ago
requires real hen for fertilization and layingpaul_ny 5 hours ago
Huh… from the original Nat Geo article:
scientists inspect eggs newly laid by real hens within 24 to 48 hours. They select the most promising ones, crack them open, and delicately pour the contents—everything but the shell—into the artificial egg structure. But everything that happened before then, from fertilization to egg laying, required a real chicken.deadbabe an hour ago
How will they resurrect a dodo? Is the idea that they have some DNA somewhere?
goda90 an hour ago
The Wikipedia article suggests they do: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodo
downrightmike 38 minutes ago
WE have one leg from one individual, and so egg fragments, should be doable, but not enough diversity
bushwart 5 hours ago
life finds a way
eutropia 5 hours ago
Colossal Biosciences
and its goal of resurrecting extinct bird species
"bird species"?C'mon.
They want to do a Jurassic Park.
yjftsjthsd-h 3 hours ago
Baby steps:)
cbdevidal 2 hours ago
Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could…
jeroenvlek 5 hours ago
Am I the only one wondering if it's 26 chickens at once from a single artificial egg or they just succeeded 26 times with different eggs? Rationally it probably has to be the latter, but the title confuses me.
dag100 4 hours ago
You could RTFA and find out.
(26 different artificial eggs. The artificial egg is the main development. Basically they take a chicken embryo (by cracking open a fertilized egg) and allow it to develop inside the artificial egg, and from which it can eventually be "hatched". Other methods for growing chickens from embryos outside their eggs have not had very high success rates.)
jeroenvlek 3 hours ago
Yeah..., or you could read the rest of the comment section and learn that I have RTFA, but that TFA was changed with one that explains it better:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257929
This was what I read: https://colossal.com/colossal-biosciences-artificial-egg-dod...
VladVladikoff 6 hours ago
This article is so strange. It is written by the company, but written in a way that an outsider would write.
> Colossal has not released its hatch rate for the 26 chickens, which limits direct comparison to prior shell-free systems. The announcement was also made without an accompanying peer-reviewed paper or publicly released dataset, meaning independent scientists have not yet been able to evaluate the underlying methodology.
x-yl 6 hours ago
It says at the bottom:
> This story is based on original reporting by Christina Larson for National Geographic. Read the full feature on National Geographic
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/artificia...
dang 4 hours ago
Ok, we've switched the URL to that link from https://colossal.com/colossal-biosciences-artificial-egg-dod... above. Thanks!
mr_toad 6 hours ago
Press releases are often written for lazy publications to copy and paste.
greatgib 6 hours ago
Also, that is the kind of corporate PR articles that are made to be quasi copy/pasted by journalists.
bookofjoe 6 hours ago
For a sec there I thought the National Enquirer had gotten a new lease on life.
paul_ny 5 hours ago
So, this means the egg came first, right?
unfitted2545 5 hours ago
Eggs are IaC.
iwontberude 6 hours ago
Have we already forgotten about chaos theory?
jfengel 6 hours ago
For a book/movie with a decent (if optimistic) grasp of genetics, its grasp of chaos theory was utterly ignorant.