Show HN: Eyeball (eyeball.rory.codes)
136 points by mrroryflint 8 hours ago
MontyCarloHall 2 hours ago
A modern take on Matthias Wandel's classic [0], which has you guess a variety of geometric attributes (e.g. angle bisection, centroid locating, shape regularization), not just simple partitioning of a line.
stronglikedan 2 hours ago
This is great. If only the little square tool would disappear while I make adjustments though - it's just enough of a distraction to barely miss.
mrroryflint 2 hours ago
Oh wow - that is very cool. Thanks for sharing.
harrisi an hour ago
Just want to say thank you for sharing your project. Very fun, and I wouldn't know about Matthias Wandel's version if not for yours!
Also, both of these tickled my brain in a great way. I think a potentially fun continuation would be to "eyeball" physics. For example, throw a ball and pause the physics before it hits something (ground, object, who knows?) and guess the location. Or show two objects about to collide with certain shapes and masses and guess what one of them will hit first and where.
harrisi 25 minutes ago
It's interesting that there are, at the time I'm commenting, 11 new users commenting on this submission, some commenting multiple times. I wonder what the effect of "share my score" type pages have on account creation.
Hugsbox 6 minutes ago
I didn't think I'd be any good at this. What I didn't expect is how wildly inaccurate I'd be on every single goddamn attempt lmao it's like I completely lack whatever part of your brain is required to do this
forlorn_mammoth 4 hours ago
Love it!
It would be great to have a 'training' mode, where you get to repeat ones you miss. This would increase the learning speed.
Easy training- repeat the one you just borked Medium training- cycles through say 5 examples until you get all five within your target range (1%, 0.1%, whatever)
mrroryflint 4 hours ago
Cool idea - thanks! I'm building a mobile app as we speak so I'll add it for sure.
densekernel an hour ago
https://eyeball.rory.codes/ I was 0.20% off on eyeball. Beat me: https://eyeball.rory.codes
pravj 26 minutes ago
I reached 0.05% and retired for the day.
Mabusto 25 minutes ago
I love these simple games that take 2 seconds to understand the rules.
Off by 6 on my iPad by mis-clicking. Very satisfying!
davidcollantes 3 hours ago
I was 0.06% off on eyeball. Beat me: https://eyeball.rory.codes.
This is fun!
layer8 2 hours ago
0.10%, but on a touch screen.
tgamma 28 minutes ago
I was 0.00% off on eyeball. Beat me: https://eyeball.rory.codes
Lucky punch, on a touch screen!
pelagicAustral 2 hours ago
> perfect - you picked 0 · off by 1 (0.03%)
Theodores 3 hours ago
Almost: 0.07%, allegedly 'perfect'. Getting an early win makes the game so much more 'playable'.
stavros 2 hours ago
Why does an early win matter? Isn't it random?
wolttam an hour ago
The low contrast of this website hurts my eyeball
layer8 2 hours ago
The fact that the numbers are in a brighter color than the end marks, and that the numbers go inwards, makes it slightly more difficult than it would otherwise be, because the eye is biased by the more prominent space between the numbers being different from the line between the marks.
schuhwerk an hour ago
Nice! Would be nice to see your progress over time (if you got better, also as a function of speed...)
Chaseraph 36 minutes ago
Well I suck.
mrroryflint 35 minutes ago
I built it and still suck, don’t feel so bad.
throwawaydudhdn 2 hours ago
Great idea! Have you considered storing triplets <range, correct number, selected number> for each try and making image plots of these (x/y coordinates are correct/selected numbers, color of each pixel represents frequency) for multiple users for each range? I think the image might reveal interesting properties of human eyeballing, like near-perfect accuracy around 50%, but with less obvious correlations.
mrroryflint 2 hours ago
Very cool idea! Will try and add.
pedromlsreis 4 hours ago
0.11% by luck, because I actually got lucky the target number was too close to zero, out of a big scale.
ashm1104 3 hours ago
I love these kind ones! Really engaging also yes as someone commented, the training mode would be an awesome idea.
Also, I tried this on laptop as well as my phone, I liked it more on my phone (I know the whole point is about precision though)
mrroryflint 3 hours ago
I'm* building an app currently!
*my old pal Claude
joey9prints 3 hours ago
Cool idea, love how simple it is. Minimal and clean.
zer0tonin 6 hours ago
This is fun but you need to put "click the line" higher on the page. It took me a while to figure out what I was looking at.
oneeyedpigeon 3 hours ago
Just any kind of contrast between foreground and background would help.
ketul_shah 6 hours ago
same happened to myself as well.
antoine-codefly 3 hours ago
Definitely need an iOS version! An angle version on a circle would be nice too.
mrroryflint 3 hours ago
Just wrapping up the beta for iOS! Will let you know asap.
tantalor 2 hours ago
What does native give you that this doesn't?
zokier 3 hours ago
10 round avg 4.5%.
A time limit would make sense imho. For extra challenge, add diagonal or curved lines.
FinanceFreddy 2 hours ago
Oh, this is actually fun! How about if you change the target every few seconds to add a bit of pressure.
oastp an hour ago
love it, pulls you in after a first try)
cdelsolar 25 minutes ago
i got a 0.00% after 3 tries!
0x000xca0xfe 3 hours ago
10 perfect hits in a row!
...
handleClick({clientX: els.bar.getBoundingClientRect().left + els.bar.getBoundingClientRect().width / state.n * state.target })
ramon156 3 hours ago
800
0 out of 1,600
I still missed. Even when there was centered text.
Maybe the human is the weakest link
ketul_shah 5 hours ago
this is fun and helping me get grounded :). adding a timer would be a good idea, I think.
ehsangazarr an hour ago
Really fun! I am pretty much blind
lbeyer 2 hours ago
Simple premise, oddly hard to put down.
tt_dev 2 hours ago
this was fun
ehsangazarr an hour ago
pretty fun!
trickybusiness 7 hours ago
this is fun!
elliotJames548 6 hours ago
i made 0.87%
nextma 8 hours ago
my best is 0.08%
zer0tonin 6 hours ago
> I was 0.00% off on eyeball. Beat me: https://eyeball.rory.codes
(It was pure luck)
aspectop 3 hours ago
my avg was around 2% not able to do more than that lol