New method turns ocean water into drinking water, without waste (rochester.edu)
460 points by speckx a day ago
ajb a day ago
There is a fundamental minimum amount of energy needed to desalinate: you can't take less energy to do it,than you could gain back (from osmotic pressure) if you allowed the desalinated water to expand a cylinder containing the residual brine. This is large. This paper is a thermal method, so it doesn't have an electricity input, but to justify their efficiency claim, they should really compare against what you could do by using the same surface area for solar panels, driving a conventional setup. My (limited) understanding is that conventional reverse osmosis is not far from the theoretical optimum, energy-wise, the main difficulties being operational (the membranes need declogging). And of course RO is more expensive than rain.
This paper is interesting, however, in directly producing crystalline salt, which is lower volume than brine and easier to dispose of, maybe even valuable.
patates 2 hours ago
I always thought that if separating water and salt were easy, our bodies would have evolved to do it so that we'd be able to drink sea water and be fine. It must have been so expensive that searching for fresh water was worth it or there were plenty of fresh water that it was never a evolutionary pressure. Evolving kidneys capable of concentrating urine beyond 3 something percent concentration (sea water) perhaps required a massive restructuring of our internal organs and a huge constant energy expenditure, so we kept seeking fresh water.
ps. I have no clue what I'm talking about
blackoil 6 minutes ago
Salt water fish can process sea water, no point in evolving for saltier brine if you have oceans of 3% water.
otterdude 18 hours ago
Thermal methods require energy, it seems like this substrate is effective at maintaining its solar-thermal absorbing properties better than a material that will attract salts
> Testing their solar-thermal desalination technique using samples of water from the Pacific, Atlantic, and Indian Oceans, Guo and his team were able to make the surface self-cleaning. In other words, it extracted freshwater and directed the remaining salts to the passive region where they could be later collected without reducing the panel’s efficiency.
This is not "large" this is a moderate improvement. Albedo is likely only marginally affected, and the solar power input over area is the same.
Depending on this cost of this process it could very likely be a wash in terms of NPV
CuriouslyC a day ago
If this can be applied to mine effluent, you could replace the maybe with most certainly. Sulfuric acid effluent lakes leech all sorts of valuable metals out of the ground.
cornholio 11 hours ago
Focusing on pure energy efficiency might be missing the point of economic efficiency.
An RO desalination plant needs electric energy to drive the pumps, which might be generated by panels which are 15-20% efficient. So, if you can have cheap thermal desalination panels, they come out ahead even if 6x less energy eficient, you avoid the whole expensive and fragile desalination plant and you gain a low skill, distributed setup.
ajb 7 hours ago
This is valid for some use cases, but then it needs to be compared with other solar distillation methods, of which there are already a variety at different levels of energy efficiency, complexity, and land use.
westurner 3 hours ago
ScholarlyArticle: "Extreme salt-resisting multistage solar distillation with thermohaline convection" (2023) https://www.cell.com/joule/fulltext/S2542-4351(23)00360-4 .. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=7551078272963689346...
"Desalination system could produce freshwater that is cheaper than tap water" (2023) https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1002811
ScholarlyArticle: "Highly efficient and salt rejecting solar evaporation via a wick-free confined water layer" (2022) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-28457-8
"Solar-powered system offers a route to inexpensive desalination" (2022) https://news.mit.edu/2022/solar-desalination-system-inexpens...
xhkkffbf an hour ago
I remember the MIT press release. I wonder if they've found any commercial success.
xyzzyz a day ago
Brine is very easy to dispose of: you just pump it back to where it came from. Solid crystalline salt, on the other hand, is a hassle.
ceejayoz a day ago
> Brine is very easy to dispose of: you just pump it back to where it came from.
Easy, but not necessarily good for the spot you're pumping concentrated salt back into.
ashdksnndck 19 hours ago
analog31 2 hours ago
SoftTalker 21 hours ago
threwrfaway 15 hours ago
xyzzyz 19 hours ago
iberator 5 hours ago
qurren 21 hours ago
Why? Just build mountains out of it and maybe even open a salt-ski park in the tropics for people who don't have snow.
asdff 17 hours ago
galaxyLogic 21 hours ago
I think I read somewhere that salt can be used as energy storage medium? So we could get both water and batteries for renewal energy.
xyzzyz 18 hours ago
darksnart 2 hours ago
Oh no, the hassle of managing the raw input for several key industrial processes that is created for free as a side product of MAKING WATER DRINKABLE WITH FREE ENERGY FROM THE SUN is TOO MUCH OF A PROBLEM! Especially considering we could instead murder millions of fish - which we then can’t eat- in the process! This entire technology is doomed!
Come on guys please at least attempt to think what you’re about to type, please, I beg you.
RobotToaster 20 hours ago
> Solid crystalline salt, on the other hand, is a hassle.
Just put it on your fries.
nkrisc 21 hours ago
In an ideal world that crystalline salt by product could be used to offset any imported or mined salt, further reducing the environmental impact of those operations.
lightedman a day ago
"Solid crystalline salt, on the other hand, is a hassle."
Just make prettier-than-Himalayan salt lamps out of it and sell it to hippies. Easy solution.
rapnie 5 hours ago
cyanydeez 19 hours ago
yeah, if you like to kill everything in a few 100 feet radius and kill some more in the zone of reliance.
this is delusional ecological
xp84 12 hours ago
xyzzyz 18 hours ago
cyberax 20 hours ago
> My (limited) understanding is that conventional reverse osmosis is not far from the theoretical optimum, energy-wise, the main difficulties being operational (the membranes need declogging). And of course RO is more expensive than rain.
RO is about 2-4x the theoretical minimum, depending on how much water you're willing to reject.
Animats a day ago
The paper: [1]
They're still at lab scale in glass. They haven't built a usable system, even a small one. The big claim here is that it doesn't clog; capillary action moves the salt out of the active area to another area, where some yet to be developed mechanism removes it. That needs to be demonstrated. If they can come up with something that runs for years without clogging or replacing the active material, that's a real advance.
Laser surface preparation is known.[2] It's useful for roughening smooth surfaces in a very structured way, in preparation for painting. The result is a smooth paint surface. If you sandblast to roughen, the first paint layer is somewhat irregular. Then you need to sand and paint again to get a smooth surface. Laser roughening has been tried for auto painting, but didn't go mainstream. A good question here is whether commercial laser surface prep systems can make the material this new process uses.
Nifty3929 a day ago
It reminds me of how the Panama canal was built, and actually the first major attempt failed and they gave up. What they learned for the second attempt was that digging was not the hard(est) part to solve - it was how to move the dirt! So much dirt!
Great book on this BTW: Path Between the Seas. I couldn't put it down.
Animats 21 hours ago
Fragility is a common problem in surface treatments, sometimes called "nanotechnology". There are super hydrophobic surface treatments that are very effective. They generate a surface which is a forest of tiny sharp points. The surface tension of water is too high to cling to such a surface. You can make something that just will not get wet. The problem is that the points are fragile, and wear destroys the effect.
Another example is ultra black coatings. Those are a forest of tiny black objects arranged so that light gets reflected multiple times and is absorbed. The commercial version is called "Vantablack". It doesn't wear well, but for optical applications such as the insides of camera lenses and telescopes, that's fine.
pchristensen 20 hours ago
It's such a good book! Like any dad reading history, I have been annoying my family for years with fun facts I learned in that book. David McCullough's other books like The Great Bridge (about building the Brooklyn Bridge) are also great.
Nifty3929 18 hours ago
jmward01 21 hours ago
This is an interesting tech, but I have big doubts. In the picture you can see some salt coating the surface. Even just a little seems like too much for this type of system. I really hope they can make this work and scale this up.
Animats 7 hours ago
This is similar to a MIT press release from 2023.[1] That's another passive solar powered desalinization system that supposedly doesn't clog with salt. The author's paper list has the 2023 paper, but no followup.[2]
Another MIT paper on desalination from 2024 has a more conventional electrically powered system that can adjust its operating speed depending on how much power is coming in. So it can run off intermittent power sources such as its own solar panels.[3] Rather than buffering the energy with batteries, just buffer the water in a tank. This made it to field test and has some efficiency numbers.
It's annoying to see these one-off announcements with no followup. A short note a year later reporting why there's no further work would be useful to later workers.
[1] https://news.mit.edu/2023/desalination-system-could-produce-...
[2] https://drl.mit.edu/publications/journal/
[3] https://www.greenmemag.com/science-technology/breakthrough-m...
KaiserPro 4 hours ago
The crucial part is that pressure from the capillary action pushes the concentrated brine out onto the non capillary area. unlike fabric the area isn't enclosed so cleaning is easier if the salt starts to accumulate.
Obviously it needs to be cleaned regularly otherwise the salt encroaches into the sensitive bits. However the cleaning method doesn't require dissolving, just scraping.
YeGoblynQueenne 19 hours ago
>> The solar-powered system uses specially engineered black metal to absorb sunlight.
The new system replaces the earlier version that used specially engineered death metal.
BLKNSLVR 17 hours ago
Which was a big upgrade from the prior system which just used a heavy rock.
jpkw 6 hours ago
Which in turn was a huge upgrade from classical methods
fhdkweig a day ago
This appears to be the same New Rochester article as 4 days ago with 20 comments.
b0rbb a day ago
Awesome, love seeing stuff out of Rochester - RIT or UofR or any of the nearby schools.
Totally underrated area for academic pursuits.
haritha-j a day ago
Indeed, it’s the same university that gave us room temperature superconductors.
SimplyUnknown 7 hours ago
Huh? That was University of Utah/Brigham Young University right. That is, if you're referring to Pons and Fleischman.
eesmith 7 hours ago
mmmBacon a day ago
UofR physic grad that also worked at the LLE here. Agree Rochester schools are underrated (although admittedly a little biased).
At least in the sciences you have access to lots of opportunities you don’t have at bigger name schools.
They set me up in life in a way that I don’t think would have happened elsewhere.
technothrasher 16 hours ago
I had a great time at UR in the early 90’s because they had the most computing hardware per interested student in the country. I was able to relatively quickly work my way up to access to pretty much any system the school owned that I wanted, including the Cray at the LLE.
block_dagger 15 hours ago
As an RIT alum, I tend to agree.
0x59 a day ago
Agree! Shout out to the Laboratory for Laser Energetics
dyauspitr a day ago
RIT is pretty well known as a good school I believe.
userbinator 9 hours ago
I believe the most efficient method to turn "ocean water into drinking water" is called "rain". We just need to better collect and transport the output of what is effectively the world's biggest solar-powered desalinator.
alex_duf 7 hours ago
Obviously this is region specific, but slowing down water is one of the best ways to have fresh water.
Slow it down from trickling down a slope and you have two things: more vegetation (which also retains water) and more time for that water to penetrate the ground for local wells.
You can completely "terraform" a desertic region https://youtube.com/shorts/cfhbtgon4Nk?is=oAExB5UeMAsShBux
mettamage 7 hours ago
Let’s grab a giant pole and catch clouds. I wonder how much liter of water a giant cloud is. I also wonder what a good unit would be for a cloud. Small, medium and large is all I have
Laurel1234 8 hours ago
Well, sometimes it doesn't rain and (at least for coast regions) being able to desalinate can be of critical importance.
LogicFailsMe a day ago
So crazy question: take a dehumidifier, attach some solar panels, and deploy at scale for non-potable water suitable for crop irrigation anywhere that isn't a desert. Does it work? And if not, why?
oceanplexian 19 hours ago
The short answer is all those problems have already been solved.
Israel desalinates 75-85% of its drinking water. The problem is political and economic dysfunction.
California for example could be doing widespread desalination with nuclear power and technology from the 1970s. They could also greatly expand reservoirs and waterways, but don’t do it. Very similar to Rome in the 400s, when people were using aqueducts built by a past civilization but lost the ability to construct them.
iso1631 2 hours ago
Nuclear is very expensive per MWh and thus per litre of water generated
Solar on the other hand is very cheap, and you don't need to desalinate 24/7 -- just do it when power is cheapest (which is during the sunny times if you have large amounts of solar, during windy if you have large amounts of wind, etc)
LarsAlereon a day ago
It takes too much energy and produces water too slowly to scale. In general any area with sufficient moisture in the air to explore this also has easier access to rain and ground water.
jillesvangurp 11 hours ago
A lot of energy is only a problem if that energy is very expensive.
The good news in a desert: plenty of sunshine. So you can generate a lot of electricity with some cheap solar panels, there is plenty of space to put some down, and there aren't a lot of NIMBYs around to complicate the permitting process for that.
Some desert ecosystems actually depend on condensation with specialized plants and animals harvesting humidity from ocean breeze. Large parts of e.g. the Sahara border on the Atlantic ocean. Lots of water in the air but not a lot of rain. And even if humidity is low, there still is some water in the air usually.
But the simple fact of course is that there is a lot more water in water than there is in air. If you want to extract meaningful amounts of water from air, you need to process a lot of it.
LogicFailsMe a day ago
Great point, in my case in the PNW, the water from my local well is infested with manganese (as in clogging the household plumbing in the absence of a sediment filter) and other contaminants and the water company providing it is owned by private equity. Legally, I can drill my own well for non-potable irrigation, but god forbid I filter and/or chlorinate it for my own household use. So I end up considering options like this, thanks for debunking.
SoftTalker 21 hours ago
KaiserPro 3 hours ago
Yield depends on humidity, which varies according to region and season.
It also requires more infrastructure to get yield. In theory all you'd need to have is these etched metal plates, a transparent dome and a source of briny water. (and a cleaning mechanism)
The etched plates creates 100% humidity (probably more as it'll condense out)
mrguyorama a day ago
It "works" in the sense that this is what 99% of "Get water from air" scams are.
The reason it doesn't actually work is that it is extremely inefficient. Getting water to condense requires you to somehow reject massive quantities of heat. That's fundamental to physics.
Also, literally anywhere a dehumidifier is reasonably effective, is humid and usually doesn't have such dire water problems. Deserts have extremely low humidity and dehumidifiers working in a desert will produce very little water.
Even a good humidifier in a humid environment is burning KW to generate on the order of ten liters of water a day.
There are a couple places on earth that are essentially deserts but have an early morning humid fog roll through regularly, and those places figured out capturing that water in the air long long before we invented the refrigeration cycle.
It is literally cheaper to desalinate.
Maybe you could build giant greenhouses to fill with sea water and let the sun evaporate the water and collect that with a dehumidifier? Still absurdly inefficient. Water has such an obscene specific capacity for heat that any thermal avenue of separating it from something else will use immense energy.
wagwang 20 hours ago
The humid areas where they might work probably already have a lot of water?
casey2 a day ago
What do you mean work? No, because there is no single dehumidifier on the market that will get you enough water, so you are out $80 grand, you could have just paid for water delivery.
gaiagraphia 20 hours ago
Always wondered why the coast of the Red Sea isn't littered with channels which get flooded with seawater, which then evpporate into glassed ceilings; creating freshwater, and leaving behind salts for mining.
Sand -> Glass -> heated saltwater -> freshwater + minerals -> ??? -> profit?
Combined with some mangrove farms, surely desert coasts are able to support more life.
Wonder if this is scalable tech, and how quickly it can 'process' water. I guess if they're combined with transparent solar panels, it could be quite an epic tech.
dirt_like 20 hours ago
Slightly different idea to take Red Sea water, concentrate it, and flow into the Dead Sea to stabilize the water level in the Dead Sea which is a big problem. A billion or so was spent but the project is on hold for some combination of financial, political and environmental issues.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Sea%E2%80%93Dead_Sea_Water...
gaiagraphia 19 hours ago
I love projects like this. A shame the west has handed over the baton to the Chinese and Saudis when it comes to actually being daring with megaprojects.
Some over stuff whhich are cool to read about:
Redirecting Siberian rivers into Central Asia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_river_reversal
Redirecting Congo basin rivers to replenish Lake Chad https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Chad_replenishment_projec...
Filling in a depression in Egyptian Sahara desert and fllooding it with Mediterrraanean water to generate huuuuuuuuuuuuge hydro https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qattara_Depression_Project
(Similar ideas proposed for Lake Eyre, the lakes in Tunisia, and the Afar Depression in Djibouti, too).
AlexandrB 17 hours ago
jrumbut 20 hours ago
If you've ever been to the beach, you can smell the salt air and rotting seaweed and hear the birds.
It's all gonna get on the glass (from above and below), and eventually the salt left behind is going to build up. The salt left behind is very hard on any structure or machinery used to move it which makes repairing the large glass enclosure a pain. All this for a slow trickle of water is generally not worth it.
gaiagraphia 19 hours ago
The Saudis were fucking around with the idea of solar domes at one point. Haven't heard anything about it for a while though (probably due to maths, lol). A shame, I've always been fascinated by Egypt and the empty expanses of nothingness. On long bus journeys around the country, the imagination can run wild.
https://www.solarwaterplc.com/featured-news/whats-inside-thi...
fakedang 13 hours ago
iceboundrock 14 hours ago
I am wondering if they combined photomolecular effect[1] to make it even more energy-efficient
[1] https://news.mit.edu/2024/how-light-can-vaporize-water-witho...
biodiesel 10 hours ago
Distillation of H2O, where it loses an oxygen molecule and becomes H2, or gains a hydrogen molecule and becomes H2O2.
scythe a day ago
They are talking about lithium recovery, but there is a less exotic byproduct I'm interested in. One tonne (≈ 1 m^3) of seawater contains about 1.3 kilograms of magnesium, equivalent to about 4 kg of magnesite ore. Typical desal prices are on the order of $1 per tonne. Magnesite ore goes for about $100 per tonne, so the crude magnesium in a tonne of seawater is worth about $0.40, which could account for a substantial fraction of the desalination cost. (These numbers are very rough.)
Now you ask: why don't we just recover magnesium from brines if it's so great? Magnesium recovery from seawater isn't that easy: typically you have to treat it with some kind of alkali (often Ca(OH)2), so the cost is dominated by the extraction process (your alkali is consumed!), and you're competing with a pretty cheap ore. But if you have a solid byproduct, instead of a liquid, the options for magnesium recovery might be a lot more efficient, potentially offsetting the cost.
The fourth-most-prevalent ion, sulfate, might also be interesting, at least in a hypothetical post-petroleum future where sulfur as a byproduct of fossil fuel extraction is no longer "free". Sulfate is also annoying to extract from seawater, but again if we have a solid, the rules change.
As for the "table" salt itself, I think we'd quickly saturate (!) the market.
cjbenedikt 20 hours ago
Calcining Mg(OH)₂ -which is what you find in seawater - converts the soft compound into magnesium oxide, a valuable mineral commonly used in refractories, catalysts, and ceramics.The Chemical Equation: \(Mg(OH)_2 \xrightarrow{\Delta} MgO + H_2O\)Temperature Requirements: You need to heat the magnesium hydroxide to a temperature range between 500°C and 900°C. Heating at the lower end (around 500°C) yields a highly reactive, porous form of nano-MgO, while heating above 1,200°C creates "dead-burned" MgO used in high-heat industrial bricks.The Yield: The weight of your final MgO product will be roughly 69% of the original Mg(OH)₂ mass, as the evaporated water accounts for the 31% weight difference. Already energy intensive. To get to magnesium ore is another step.
iso1631 2 hours ago
> : \(Mg(OH)_2 \xrightarrow{\Delta} MgO + H_2O\)T
At least read what you're pasting
scythe 18 hours ago
>Calcining Mg(OH)₂ -which is what you find in seawater
I'm not sure what to say, because it looks like you are copy-pasting from Wikipedia or something like that. Anyway, Mg(OH)2 is not found in seawater. Mg2+ is found as a dissociated ion. When you dry it, it mostly becomes MgCl2 with a little MgSO4. Mg(OH)2 is produced from seawater by the alkaline extraction process I mentioned before, and the process in TFA is interesting because it might be better.
Also, nobody would ever make magnesite ore. I referenced magnesium ore prices to estimate the value of the magnesium-as-ore in sea salt, because using finished magnesium prices would be misleading. Magnesium is mostly consumed either as the metal or as the oxide in cements and ceramics.
photochemsyn a day ago
After looking at the paper, this looks like the core result:
“We collected a total of 9.3 g freshwater along with 0.343 g of sea salt from the ABF-STIC with a 9 cm2 surface area over the course of 9 hours. This is equivalent to generating 10.33 liters m−2 of freshwater and 0.38 kg m−2 of sea salt per day. The salinity of the desalinated water is found well below the WHO and EPA standards for safe drinking water.”
However the enclosure system required looks rather complicated and might be sensitive to external temperature (maybe a solar PV-powered cooling loop would help) and I imagine the cost-per-square-meter of the material is rather high, so this looks more like something for emergency response situations or maybe a desal system for a mega-yacht. If it could be scaled the idea is interesting, maybe as lithium separation from concentrated geological brines?
emsign 5 hours ago
This is a big deal for gulf states, another revenue stream in a the post-fossil world for them. Makes a transition more attractive for them.
hofo 17 hours ago
…but needs a specially engineered piece of metal…
melonman2106 2 hours ago
interesting read
excalibur 21 hours ago
> The solar-powered system uses specially engineered black metal to absorb sunlight.
Brutal. 𖤐 \m/ 𖤐
shevy-java 20 hours ago
If true then this might be indeed a game changer, but numerous academic publications turned out to be unfit for upscaling.
Who all has access to a femto laser? As far as I know these are all patented, and most of those patents (or at the least companies with rights to production) are in the USA, according to a professor who told us so some years ago in university (in central Europe, but he is quite old already, so I am not sure if his information was 100% up to date; but otherwise I do not doubt the validity of his claim made). So someone is going to milk rather than help. Will be interesting to see what happens to that in some years. My current guesstimate is that nothing will really happen or change.
kogasa240p a day ago
Probably some of the best news I've seen in a while.
nandomrumber 18 hours ago
I’m not even going to night clicking on a title that is clearly a load of bullshit.
I suppose you could water down the ocean water it’ll was drinkable, or like just add half a teaspoon of sea water to a cup or drinking water.
Buy all work done eventually decades in to waste heat.
mkl a day ago
> without waste
...except for the huge piles of salt.
If the salt was not waste, surely people would already be extracting it from the brine and the existing methods would also be "without waste".
eimrine a day ago
Persian Gulf has 20% more salt in water because of the humans which are throwing the oversalinated waste back into the sea. Dehidrated salt may be a big deal for some areas because of no waste into input.
Jblx2 a day ago
>Persian Gulf has 20% more salt in water because of the humans
I would like to read more about this from an authoritative source.
tdb7893 a day ago
mkl 17 hours ago
The brine is waste, and the dehydrated salt is also waste. Maybe dry waste is better, but it's still waste.
fsck400 10 hours ago
fluorinerocket a day ago
Can we please ban university press releases
cush 21 hours ago
why
gus_massa 3 hours ago
I'll bite, I'll bite. But first ...
@GP: Instead of a plain complain, it's better to get an interesting discussion to write an explanation of why the post makes no sense, or instead find the good debunking comments and upvote them (there are two or three good comments near the top now).
I try to be that guy (personal hall of shame https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu... ) but life is too short and I have other things to do IRL.
Also, it's not my area. It's close enough to have a good guess, but in this case for me it's better to let someone else give an accurate reply.
---
Back to this post:
It obviously makes no sense. You have salt water, you extract the water, you have to get rid of the salt. Why waste time reading the details? [There are some interesting technical ideas about new surfaces, more on this later.] Reading the details their brilliant idea is to make salt cubes and sell them. So there is no waste!
When you get rid of the salt using brine, it's easier to transport and dilute the liquid. With solid salt you must scrape it form your high tech surface (without scratching it?!) and now the solid salt is difficult to transport. Also, to sell it you must purify it because it will include nasty things like crabs legs and sea smell.
Once you extracted the 99% of the water, it's difficult to extract the other 1% of the water because it's saturated solution with a low osmotic pressure, vapor pressure and a high boiling temperature. Also, water inside the block of salt is difficult to extract, and you must crush the small blocks.
Salt production is done in big salt lakes areas, where energy is "free". I like to consider it like a huge natural solar panel. You get heat for "free" and dry wind for "free". You must pay for them in an industrial facility. Also, the normal process still requires a lot of manual labor of guys/gals with [mechanical] shovels to makes piles of salt, wait, turn it a few times, wait, turn it a few times, wait, ... and you now have a nasty salt that you still have to purify to be able to sell it.
So they will get salt that is too expensive to sell, and too much of it to flood the market, and if you put it in the garbage can it will be classified as [industrial] waste.
---
The technical part looks interesting, but it's on the bottom of an unrealistic title and first paragraph. The interesting part is about the new surface with nano details and titanium oxide that absorbs Lithium. It sound interesting and they published it so there is some validation of the claim, but after the nonsensical first claims I'd want to take a look at the feasibility details.
---
>> Can we please ban university press releases
> Why?
I work in an university and I expect technical accuracy from the press department of an university. We want people to give us money in exchange of doing real and interesting things. We want people to trust the medical doctors when they give health advice, or a lot of other specialist about other public policies.
A lot of press release of the universities have a lot of exaggerations, burning the trust of the people. Before opening one here, I like to guess what is the real result and what is the bullshit part. I think that a complete ban of university press release here is too much, but I understand why the GP is annoyed.
doublerabbit a day ago
What about removing oil from water, have we conquered that yet?
noripcord 21 hours ago
you can now extract (like mining) minerals from the ocean, sounds kind of dangerous for the ecosystem maybe? making it profitable to extract magnesium, lithium, salt... we can probably guess how this story goes.
i'm hoping it doesn't scale, honestly.
fc417fc802 17 hours ago
You're wildly underestimating the scale of the ocean. If we could extract all our necessary minerals from it rather than mining them that would alleviate a huge cause of environmental damage.
card_zero 21 hours ago
You're worried we might use all the salt in the sea for some kind of ... salt pyramids, send the water back out through sewers, and consequently leave the world's oceans diluted? That's about 1 followed by 21 zeroes, I think, in liters.
noripcord 19 hours ago
no, just take the water, remove the salt & minerals. Over time it'll dilute. Water falls again in the form of rain, obviously, but not the salt.
You're not worried? If it's for batteries? For sure they'll extract whatever they can.
card_zero 19 hours ago
kaonwarb a day ago
This reads like hyperbole:
> The brine byproduct wreaks havoc on sea life when it’s deposited back into the ocean by raising the salt level and lowering oxygen in the water.
Managing return of concentrated brine should be entirely tractable in the literal ocean.
rconti a day ago
Sure, but typically desalination plants are located in a single physical place, so a discharge pipe dumping brine 24x7 is bad for all of the things around it, as the local concentration is extremely high.
joshred a day ago
Seems like you could run a long perforated tube to diminish that effect.
dieselgate a day ago
dylan604 a day ago
01100011 a day ago
XorNot 19 hours ago
dizhn 9 hours ago
Then they should become salt producers too. Win win (win).
bilsbie a day ago
The brine thing is just a way to shut down conversation and let people feel superior for claiming there are no solutions to our problems except to reduce our standard of living.
It’s obvious you can safely put salt back into the ocean with enough dilution. I bet a middle schooler could design a system to do it.
rplnt 8 hours ago
Yeah, middle schooler with middle school understanding can design anything. There are plenty of middle school solutions in the comments around. The problem is when they meet real world, beyond their high school level understanding of the issue.
gausswho a day ago
It kinda depends where it's deposited, right? The expected AMOC collapse is fundamentally about salt imbalance.
wolfi1 a day ago
depends of course, how easy does the brine dissolve, how long does it take that it is so diluted that it can't do any harm, without that information it's not easy to tell
dylan604 a day ago
These are often built near shallower parts along the coast where changes are more pronounced.
boxed a day ago
I mean.. we really want to permanently desalinate the ocean somewhat too so putting the brine back seems kinda stupid. Put it on land, let it dry, sell some as table salt and dump the rest into abandoned mines.
wizzwizz4 a day ago
Excellent idea! The largest abandoned mines I'm aware of are salt mines, which… hang on.