Teardown: A Generic 7-Port USB 3.0 Hub That Wasn't (goughlui.com)
190 points by speckx 4 days ago
avhception 11 hours ago
Well, of course there is the "buy cheap, get trash, duh!" talking point. But if I pay more, who's to say I'll get a better product? The OEM or some middleman or whoever might just pocket the difference and push crap anyway. Well-known brands have done this as well, either intentionally or because they got shafted by their supplier as well.
muvlon 9 hours ago
I've definitely realized this in a couple of markets: Buy cheap, get trash. Buy expensive, get expensive trash with better marketing. Working with power tools from various brands has made me realize they all cheap out in the same ways. Plastic gears where there used to be metal, undersized motor drivers that fry themselves under sustained load, trigger switches that start misbehaving or die completely after a few months.
Also, all of the brands (cheap or expensive) will sometimes mess up the cost-cutting and make something reliable by accident. Buying cheap gives me more chances to get lucky in this way.
mixermachine 6 hours ago
Channels like project farm https://youtube.com/@projectfarm or other reviewers that are not sponsored are truly my main source of information in this age.
Some direct reviews between 2 and 4 stars are also sometimes useful. Always discard the 5 star ones...
equake 6 minutes ago
slipperybeluga 7 hours ago
This wasn't the case 20 years ago. There was actually a good article on HN a few months ago showing how most of the brands are owned by one company that has ruined them all. Still a few good brands. Need to research https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147665
pjc50 10 hours ago
This has been a problem for a while. It's Akerloff "market for lemons" applied to technology. Sometimes however you gamble and win, discovering that the Chinese device actually is really good for the price. Occasionally even better, when you discover that some anti-feature like DRM is either not implemented or trivially turned off.
avhception 8 hours ago
This is my favorite version of this dynamic, intentionally buying the crap because they cheaped out on the antifeatures.
inigyou 7 hours ago
It used to be that cheap android junk devices would just give you a root shell with "adb shell" - no need for root exploits or reflashing - while expensive devices would give you a locked down shell.
Tade0 10 hours ago
The other day my bicycle light gave out, so I took it apart - was not the most expensive option, but also not the cheapest.
It was advertised as having a 2600mAh battery, but when I opened it up, inside there was a 1700mAh cell. Also no sign of purported weatherproofing, as the lens was not even glued in.
I have a 2000mAh cell in the same form factor (approximately 500Wh/l, so believable) on its way from China, which makes me wonder how did they come up with that 2600mAh figure.
layer8 2 hours ago
> how did they come up with that 2600mAh figure.
The same capacity corresponds to different mAh at different voltages, maybe they are playing games with that.
antisthenes 31 minutes ago
namero999 7 hours ago
Because more is better. Seriously, the game they play is at this point ludicrous. I saw 18650 cell being advertised through the years as 2500mAh, to 3500mAh (still reasonable/credible), then suppliers started to one-up each other and you could see 5000mAh, 9000mAh, 9999mAh up to, I kid you not, 1.000.000mAh. If I had no clue, of course I would by the 1KAh single cell XD
Hackbraten 11 minutes ago
pixl97 6 hours ago
Aurornis 5 hours ago
> But if I pay more, who's to say I'll get a better product?
Price isn’t the only axis by which products are evaluated.
Aliexpress eBay and even Amazon are full of listings that have high prices, just waiting for someone naive enough to mistake them for quality products. They don’t sell much or at all.
When people find a cheap product from a known brand they jump on it because they know there’s a higher chance of it being okay, and if not there’s a higher chance that they can return it or get warranty support.
When people buy a JUPQRKBOT branded Amazon special for a too good to be true price, they know they’re playing a different and much riskier game.
kasabali 9 hours ago
Whenever I get the same device from AliExpress and the local white label importers, even though the outside casing is identical, AliExpress option has always had more quality. Locally sold ones has always the crappier internals albeit they come in a box (versus AE ones come in a bag)
fnoff 6 hours ago
I came to that conclusion when buying electric milk frothers. Several, because there is no difference between cheap and expensive. At all. They're all crap :')
sdsdssweew213 2 hours ago
If you live in Europe, I recommend trying one from Lidl. It was cheap and so far I've been quite satisfied with it.
lostlogin 11 hours ago
The stance ‘all hubs are trash’ has served me well.
kube-system 5 hours ago
It's easy to get that impression when you're buying stuff from the big box store, because it's all race to the bottom type stuff.
When I run into this issue in any product category, I can solve it by searching for a solution from an "industrial" or "commercial" supplier. It'll cost 10x, but it'll usually work, and if it doesn't you'll at least be able to talk to someone who knows what they're doing.
In just about any product category, there is very little quality difference within the same order of magnitude in cost.
J_Shelby_J 2 hours ago
I recently built a usb hub.
I got a box, some usb cables that have a female end and are fitted to mate to the box. If you are curious, it’s a box made for pro-audio equipment with precut holes. The holes are made for xlr ports, and the usb cables are terminated with xlr ports.
Now I have a usb hub where all four ports are wired directly to my motherboard’s ports. I probably should write a blog post with a parts list.
cl3misch 2 hours ago
bayindirh 10 hours ago
I managed to get a couple of good ones. While they're more like docking stations, Kingston's, now discontinued, Nucleum and UGreen's wares are all good.
If you go higher level, of course there's Thunderbolt docks, but you can't make them cheaply, so they're generally good.
mrngld 9 hours ago
askvictor 9 hours ago
I've generally found that the more expensive, branded USB C hubs are more trash than the cheap generics
kj4ips 5 hours ago
The trend of slapping two STT 4-port hubs together is so common, that even name-brand hubs for reputable brands are often this, including the back feed issues. I purchased hubs form a solar-named company, and one that has a similar name to a large US department store, and they were cascaded 4port, STT, ganged overcurrent and switching.
I've started buying PCBAs from Ali, where the vendor advertises the exact chip set in use. It's often cheaper than domestic options.
Listings for assembled hubs (whether ali or domestic) almost never include information about the hub's actual characteristics, unless you're looking at a 300+ hub sold to audiophiles.
I'd really like a source for a true 7p hub, with MTT, proper power, per-port overcurrent and power switching, but I can't seem to find one, especially since vendors tend to rev b2c products with no notice (one of the name-brand ones I bought had been downcosted shortly before I bought it).
yborg 4 hours ago
Why not name the sellers?
wlesieutre 3 hours ago
I have no idea what the solar named brand is, but maybe the department-store-like one is Targus?
belkinpower 3 hours ago
rickdeckard 9 hours ago
My first thought whenever I come across such a badly-engineered no-name device is "oh great, another bad reference design which will poison the pool of all the available devices out there"
It helps a bit to spot and avoid that exact exterior design, but often those devices are designed to reuse the same mold as more-expensive ones and/or keep changing the design based on the purchasing customer.
So you end up on AliExpress looking at 5 identical hubs, but the cheapest one may have a different PCB inside.
Or you look at 5 different hubs, with all of them having the same PCB inside...
avhception 7 hours ago
"Ah, that's Rev. B, yeah, known problem..." Like I could somehow buy by PCB rev. Sometimes they even swap entire controllers within the same Rev.
rickdeckard 5 hours ago
That's the point, the dimension is "yeah, the ODM also offers a 2 USD cheaper hub that uses a USB2.0 controller for 7 of the 8 ports", and now you're browsing a list of equally looking products spanning 5 to 15 USD without a clue which of the straws you're going to pull...
Klaster_1 12 hours ago
Wow what an unexpectedly useful article! I have exactly this hub and wondered if I was imagining things. It absolutely has issues beyond that, for example I somehow managed to make a couple of ports unusable for micro-controller flashing even though they used to work just fine. For that price, it's an OK choice to low bandwidth stuff like periphery dongles and security keys, and the form-factor makes it easy to attach under desk or behind display. And buttons come in handy when you need to unpower a dev board. Anyone can recommend a similar shaped proper USB 3 hub off Ali?
ddtaylor 11 hours ago
I had the opposite problem actually I think. I have these small nano teensy USB things that are programmable similar to Arduino, but they have a poor negotiation at start. I was using these to automate keyboard activity, so when plugged in they appear as a USB HID.
This crappy 7 port hub is one of the only ones that "works" to reprogram the chips over USB. Direct connections and other hubs cause it to always appear as a HID and never appear as a thing that can be reprogrammed.
lostlogin 11 hours ago
> I was using these to automate keyboard activity,
I’m interested.
ddtaylor 10 hours ago
okramcivokram 10 hours ago
low_tech_punk 6 hours ago
It's a classic scam. It is a 3.0 USB 7-Port Hub, not a 7-port USB 3.0 Hub. The number 3.0 is the model number of the hub, not the protocol.
happosai 5 hours ago
Ah like the roller bearing manufacturer established in the town of Ball, so the company could be called BALL BEARING.
bpye 11 hours ago
The linked article on the same blog on building a tower of optical drives is also quite interesting: https://goughlui.com/2026/03/15/project-building-an-optical-...
PaulHoule 2 hours ago
I haven't seen a USB 3.0 hub that I've liked, and I've paid top dollar.
USB 1.0 had a model where you really could enumerate 127 devices attached to a hub. The USB 3.0 makes no promises for what should be possible with hubs and if you actually try it you find that at some point plugging in a new device makes other devices drop out. Like I've never been able to plug 7 devices into a 7 port hub.
jamesnorden 9 hours ago
There's a lot of "USB 3.0 hubs" on the market that have only one 3.0 port, I went back and forth buying/returning a lot on Amazon before giving up on getting one that had all 3.0 ports.
MegaDeKay 6 hours ago
Yep. I bought one of these intentionally for that reason. The USB port on my Kobo Clara HD stopped working one day after I hadn't used it in a wile. Couldn't connect to it via my PC or my laptop. I did a bit of research and realized the Kobo I had won't work on a USB 3.0 connection, and that I had upgraded my PC and my laptop (all equipped with fancy smanchy USB 3.0 port) since I'd last used the Kobo.
jadbox 8 hours ago
What do you recommend?
jamesnorden 3 hours ago
There was actually one I managed to find on Aliexpress, out of all places, that turned out to be legit.
It looked like that, I can't guarantee they're all created the same though, also it has RGB lights for some reason.
https://ae01.alicdn.com/kf/S6b270a53da9b4179af73036c5f6f9c89...
brcmthrowaway 3 hours ago
They left us hanging.
aghuang 2 hours ago
Wow, thats very informative. This also tells you that cheap knockoffs can also be deadly if the circuity is poor.
chromehearts 8 hours ago
I think that I have the same exact USB hub. I personally don't care about the USB 3.0 issue mentioned because it's only used to charge some devices. I think it's a controller charging station, a radio charging station, wireless charging station and a small device for rechargable batteries
dowonseo 8 hours ago
I always think cables, hubs, and docks should be reliable ones even if they cost more
Otherwise they become the weakest links in your setup
tclancy 6 hours ago
Well sure, but how to tell before you buy them?
preisschild 12 hours ago
Whats always annoying is by using nested 4-port hub chips inside a hub with more than 4 ports you get very easily to the max nested depth limit (5). I have a monitor kvm switch that is also an usb hub. It itself only has two ports. Two usb hubs (that are internally nested) are plugged into those ports that I have at the back of my desk where all the HID are plugged in, but I also have a usb hub on the front of my desk so I can easily hotplugmy joysticks, yubikeys and usb flash drives.
Apparently that use case is very complicated with USB even in modern times :(
mschuster91 11 hours ago
> This means a connected external power supply will backfeed the computer and that could be a recipe for damage to the port or the computer and is something we had known about causing issues over 20 years ago, yet we’ve still got designs with this issue today.
On the other hand it's useful for space constrained embedded projects. I got a small outdoor enclosure for a Pi Zero, to which two RTL-SDR sticks are attached - too much to supply via the Pi's USB-OTG power rail alone. With the Adafruit microUSB OTG hub [1], I now only have one power supply going into the hub that backfeeds the Pi Zero... one cable less.
bArray 11 hours ago
I think this was somewhat predictable. The USB cable from the hub is too long, and it's not thick enough. USB3 can also kick off a decent amount of heat, it's not a good sign when the case is in plastic.
If you're looking for a good USB3 hub, look for one with a short thick USB cable, metal chassis. If it has HDMI it's a good since because you're unlikely to pump that via USB2.
wazoox 8 hours ago
I have one (ANKER IIRC?) that looks very much like this, but with two-position buttons that actually cut power, and USB3.0 level connection on all ports I tried. Also comes with the proper power supply for the barrel power connector. I suppose this one is a knock-off of mine :D
fudged71 5 hours ago
I trust Anker and yet I recently got a phone charger where the USB wall adapter was a dud
aidenn0 4 hours ago
USB 3.0 Hubs have always been pretty "meh" for me. I think the quality control, even on name brands, is poor.
PaulHoule 2 hours ago
It's the spec. "It just doesn't work" whether or not the hardware or software is good quality.
ajross 6 hours ago
What's interesting to me is the part of this design that isn't junk: the single wired-through-to-the-host USB3 port. Why don't more hubs do this? I'd love to have access to a cheap port expander that lets me plug my junk in without losing access to the high speed port on the laptop. But no one sells that. You get a full USB3 hub, which is mostly wasteful for an input dongle or UART adapter, or a USB2 one that forces you to juggle stuff around when you need to plug in a thumb drive.
NietTim 13 hours ago
I used to have exactly one like that but without all the bogus 3.0 printing on it.
IveSeenItAll 13 hours ago
Not much to say about the article itself ("cheap stuff from AliExpress-or-its-Amazon-representatives isn't great, news at 11"), but just in case the author happens to be following comments here: I'm pretty sure the first photo shows your name, address and email in small print at the top?
nar001 12 hours ago
It's actually the importer's info from the Chinese manufacturer, not the OP, since it's the switch packaging (it'd be inside the original package they'd have received from Aliexpress)
netsharc 11 hours ago
AliExpress shipping is wild.. as far as I understand it they try to find the cheapest place to send packages from, so (living in Europe) I've received packages from Australia and Azerbaijan. They probably send a palette of stuff to a country that has cheap International postage, and from there the palette of goods get broken down and packaged for the 1000s of end-consumers..
qingcharles 5 hours ago
flyflewflaw 11 hours ago
MallocVoidstar 11 hours ago
teiferer 11 hours ago
$5 USD. What did you expect?
Always surprises me when people pay essentially nothing for a product and then complain about quality.
bayindirh 11 hours ago
Marketed as a USB 2.0 hub with a single USB 3.0 port? When I last looked, typing truth via keyboards were free and valuable at the same time.
bigfishrunning 5 hours ago
Why type truth when you can have some LLM generate lies?
bayindirh 5 hours ago
ddtaylor 11 hours ago
Would you say the same about a vendor selling rotten or spoiled food?
lostlogin 11 hours ago
If it was 1/4 the normal price, I’d be suspicious.
einsteinx2 7 hours ago
Right? This is basically one small step away from stuff like “2TB usb stick for $20” scam listings on AliExpress. Of course it will be fake or crap. Cool tear down and write up though.
Gigachad 9 hours ago
I would expect at any price point the seller should not be lying about the specs.
bigfishrunning 5 hours ago
Well then AliExpress is not the storefront for you
Cthulhu_ 10 hours ago
I mean yeah you get what you pay for. The main issue I think is false advertising; there's only so much you can do for foreign webshops, but if this were on e.g. Amazon, then Amazon should be pulled up on it (that is, huge fines so they don't do it again).
EU is cracking down on foreign webshops at least, setting rules for advertising, increasing import taxes to avoid flooding the local market with many individual packages that circumvent spot checks for basic electronic safety and (EM) emissions (what the FCC looks out for as well), etc.
alexious-sh 6 hours ago
OMG, websites that don't properly render in modern browsers still exist in 2026, when you don't even need a human to create it.
bigfishrunning 5 hours ago
It's wordpress; it renders well on firefox anyway.
avidiax 5 hours ago
One of the hopes I have for AI is that products like this become almost unsellable.
Gemini strongly disrecommends buying this product[1], but it's not clear if the opinion is based on Dr. Gough's review in-part.
This, of course, leads to another arms race where listings like this will be "AI optimized". They may have prompt injections, or simply specifically claim that issues like backfeeding are resolved when they are not.
And it also makes the AI companies an arbiter of what products are marketable.
devmor 4 hours ago
Why on earth do you think an LLM would be capable of detecting problems with a listing like that without a human doing so first? LLMs are just as gameable as SEO, if not more so.