AWS: Inaccurate Estimated Billing Data – $1.7 billion (undefined)

809 points by nprateem 10 hours ago

URL already posted: https://health.aws.amazon.com/health/status

I've got an estimated bill for $1.7 BILLION over this month. Normal usage is < $5.

Obvs have created an urgent AWS support ticket. Anyone else seeing something like this?

Update: Reddit link: https://www.reddit.com/r/aws/comments/1uyuaw7/help_my_bill_s...

donavanm 3 hours ago

Ive dealt with this error at AWS. It’s a unit error. In my case we _meant_ to charge like 5¢/GB, but missed the unit (GB), and then the billing system defaults to bytes. 5¢ per Byte of data transferred meant some customers were seeing MM bills within hours. Got paged by support around 2am, had it fixed and amendments issues by 3-4am, apology emails shortly after.

Services emit metering values that arent directly tied to prices. Every SKU/line item is defined in a “pricing plan”, with a unit type, regions, and price per unit. The metering records are joined to a pricing plan based on account id, region, sku, etc. mess up the unit type in the pricing plan and the metering data conversion doesnt work, and you get crazy bills.

sscaryterry 11 minutes ago

This isn't a flippant comment. Imagine though, being presented with this. Imagine having some underlying health problem (e.g. cardiovascular).

Do not be surprised if real people actually die from this mistake, from the anxiety, the surprise, the helplessness.

01284a7e 2 hours ago

No tests? Just mess up some mundane detail [1] and voila! Wake-up calls and heart attacks for 100,000s of administrators?

1: "Oh, well, this is not a mundane detail, Michael!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fGHaVn5rGo

akdev1l 2 hours ago

Not even tests but just some basic anomaly detection lol.

Like maybe if the bill amounts increase by like 10M% there should be someone that looks into it

qurren 2 hours ago

Groxx a minute ago

mcpherrinm an hour ago

01284a7e 2 hours ago

deltaray3 an hour ago

It's just like in Superman III

mvdtnz 2 hours ago

Why would you think there are "no tests"?

27183 an hour ago

crossroadsguy 2 hours ago

Had it been half a million dollars or something or say like a few hundred dollars?

nurettin 2 hours ago

This is why I always fail loud rather than pick a stupid default.

pudgywalsh 2 hours ago

"I must've put a decimal point in the wrong place or something. I always mess up some mundane detail."

AlotOfReading 2 hours ago

Unit mistakes happen all the time, which is why you should be using your units library religiously and still being vigilant even then.

Worst case I've found was off by 15 orders of magnitude.

gleenn an hour ago

zapkyeskrill an hour ago

27183 an hour ago

yuchen20 9 hours ago

I got 3 consecutive emails warning that my budget crossed its $18 threshold. Opened it up: cost was 78 million. Thought it was a phishing attempt, logged into my actual account, and... still 78 million. EMOTIONAL DAMAGE.

root-parent 5 hours ago

Wanna bet the description of this job post will be updated by the end of the day?

"Software Development Engineer II, AWS Invoicing"

https://www.amazon.jobs/de/jobs/10428480/software-developmen...

"...Our platforms are powered by generative AI, large language models, knowledge graphs, and agentic architectures that dynamically compose specialized agents based on context. We apply these capabilities across three reinforcing areas: intelligent launch readiness — where autonomous AI agents analyze, generate, and validate the information needed to go live in a new market; cloud-native service orchestration — where configuration-driven microservices replace per-launch bespoke engineering with centralized, reusable capabilities so that expanding into a new country becomes a zero-code configuration change rather than a development cycle; and continuous validation..."

ibejoeb 5 hours ago

Wow:

    In this role you will:
    - Design and build agentic AI systems that analyze, generate, and validate...
    - Build agentic architectures that compose specialized AI agents dynamically...
    - Build AI-driven continuous validation frameworks powered by agentic workflows and large language models that autonomously manage...

This is invoicing? If ever there was a domain that was purely deterministic, you'd hope it was invoicing.

cliglot 4 hours ago

curun1r 2 hours ago

root-parent 5 hours ago

londons_explore 3 hours ago

TJSomething an hour ago

blitzar 4 hours ago

> 194,400.00 USD annually

Fuck it, im in.

TheOtherHobbes an hour ago

sebmellen 5 hours ago

That job description feels so far beyond parody that I could scarcely believe it until opening the link! What a world.

root-parent 5 hours ago

LPisGood 3 hours ago

paganel 4 hours ago

antognini 3 minutes ago

To paraphrase the old joke, if you wake up with a $78,000 AWS bill, you have a problem. If you wake up with a $78 million AWS bill, Amazon has a problem.

rcleveng 5 hours ago

I did too, those awstrack.me URL's look super suspicious and I hadn't seen this alert trigger before so didn't know what to expect.

At first I was sure it was a phishing attempt. Then went to the console (not using those links) Saw there was an outage where the console was wrong (no mention of email alerts) Then I thought I was hacked - what a perfect cover up for someone to evade detection when the console was wrong. Looked at some logs, realized the incident text was just not exhaustive on the impact. Went back to my cup of coffee.

Note to self- should have looked here first.

jayanmn 4 hours ago

Enterprise account . We got - 3trillion and change

chii 4 hours ago

-$3 trillion! That's the highest earning investment that has ever existed!

theflyingelvis 3 hours ago

3.7 billion. Offered to pay it in monthly installments. Haven’t hears back

idiotsecant 4 hours ago

Quick do your IPO before the books update

01284a7e 4 hours ago

Yes, I am taking legal action, no doubt.

bot403 2 hours ago

Why? What's the damages? They showed you a wrong number, then later acknowledged it and fixed it. Just because the number was "very big" to you doesn't mean you were actually aggrieved in some way.

amelius an hour ago

dymk 3 hours ago

…for emotional damage?

inigyou 2 hours ago

SegfaultSeagull 5 hours ago

Time to get a second job buddy.

wglass 4 hours ago

It's crazy enough this will be fixed soon.

Years ago I found an actual hidden error in my bill. (This was early 2010s). The system was calculating the EC2 reservation savings incorrectly for some of my servers. I was crunching all their detailed usage data on a regular basis in an 18 tab spreadsheet and couldn't get it to fully reconcile. I spent months trying to track down the discrepancy. Once I found it, I had to convince AWS their system was wrong, which took another big chunk of time. Meanwhile the discrepancy continued to accumulate.

After 14 months I got a $7,000 refund. I was told it had to be approved by the head of AWS. I've never seen a calculation error on their part since.

donavanm 3 hours ago

> After 14 months I got a $7,000 refund. I was told it had to be approved by the head of AWS.

$7,000 of credits is no problem. At that time a friendly neighborhood PM or director could issue the credit without much oversight.

Your problem is the time period. Amending a bill in the same cycle is EZ. Fixing the previous cycle is a PITA but pretty common. Issuing amendments for the previous financial _years_ would be a huuuuge PITA going through finance etc.

kccqzy 20 minutes ago

Banks and financial institutions are the same. If they haven’t issued you a monthly/quarterly statement yet, they can just apologize and tell you the numbers are wrong please wait for the statement. But it is a major issue if an actual statement has the wrong numbers.

michaelmrose 2 hours ago

Reminds me of working for a cable company and being told that even if we screwed up and stole from the customer the look back period was only a few months and if we found an error from before that we weren't supposed to correct it.

SoftTalker an hour ago

steve_adams_86 4 hours ago

A couple of my coworkers think I’m nuts for watching cost explorer so closely but

1. The time it takes to look and notice costs that don’t make sense easily pays for itself, and then some (in my experience). I doubt you spent $7k of your time tracking this down, and you probably noticed optimization opportunities that saved you even more

2. I hate the idea of wasting money on buying Jeff Bezos a bigger yacht

jarrettcoggin 3 hours ago

I've personally noticed and saved multiple $xx,xxx monthly cost billing spikes just by take a daily glance at our cost explorer. I'm in the AWS accounts every day doing investigative work anyway that an extra 30-60 seconds is trivial.

Seeing something "small" like an ECS task that is continuously failing to start properly because of a bug and repeatedly pulls a container image or a lambda function that's taking longer that it reasonably should (takes 5-10 seconds when it's normally a tens or a few hundred milliseconds) can dramatically drive up a bill in short order.

inigyou 2 hours ago

> 2. I hate the idea of wasting money on buying Jeff Bezos a bigger yacht

Then you aren't using AWS. At least half of all the money you give to Amazon is yacht money.

steve_adams_86 22 minutes ago

johnbarron 3 hours ago

>> It's crazy enough this will be fixed soon.

Its going on for 12 hours. Looks like the humans can´t understand the agentic code that was checked in....

lukaslueg 9 hours ago

Apparently what used to be `GB of storage consumed` is confused with `Bytes of storage consumed`, leading to a cool off by 2*30 error.

> You're right to question my calculation. The MCP server failed to connect when I tried to look up the field definition. I guessed instead of validating. This is on me. But look at all the revenue!

VulgarExigency 5 hours ago

The user is asking me to calculate how much money they should charge their customer. The values they've given me are 0.45, 1.67, and 2.50. This is 2.50 + 1.67 + 0.45 = 4.62, but it could be any other number. Perhaps we should be concatenating the numbers instead. Wait! The . could also mean multiplication. 0 . 45 . 1. 67 . 2 . 50 = 3015000. But wouldn't multiplying by 0 zero it out? That can't be right, we wouldn't be charging anything. So 3015000 must be correct.

You should charge your customer 3015000 thousand dollars.

Izkata 18 minutes ago

So uh did you type that out or generate it somewhere?

Number felt high so I wanted to double check and I only get 301500.

idiotsecant 4 hours ago

Would be funny if it wasn't so close to true

yunnpp 2 hours ago

ghurtado 4 hours ago

> You're right to question my calculation.

Literally impossible to tell whether this is parody or an actual response any longer.

I challenge anyone to write something so stupid that an LLM couldn't possibly respond with it. I don't believe such limit exists.

ihateolives 3 hours ago

Just today I gave my local agent a CSV which listed a bunch files with of human readable size units and asked it to count rows in each GB range. Sounds simple enough but it completely miscalculated, because it parsed MB as GB for some reason. In hindsight it would've be quicker just to do it in Excel or something.

dabbz 3 hours ago

I've found personally it's better to use AI to build a deterministic script for calculations like that. (anything that manipulates data should be a script not an AI).

ihateolives 2 hours ago

marcta 3 hours ago

That is literally what Excel is for. Why didn't you use that first of all?

ihateolives 2 hours ago

AlienRobot 2 hours ago

leugim 5 hours ago

Oh great so 2*30=60 he only owes 28.3$ million... hehe

I guess you wanted to say 2^30 which makes 1.5$

hansvm 5 hours ago

My hunch is the HN formatter swallowed the double asterisk typical of python exponents.

While we're being pedantic, 2^30 is 28 in normal programming languages ;)

stefan_ 5 hours ago

Vibecoded the billing system, raised revenue 9000%. Great for that promo package.

poly2it 3 hours ago

This error could be fixed with better typing. If you compute on GiB in a billing system, make sure it can only ever be mutated with a GiB type!

raverbashing 5 hours ago

AI slop. Or just a distracted dev

root-parent 5 hours ago

>> Or just a distracted dev

And a distracted tester? And a distracted pipeline of regression tests?

No, the truth is way worst...

silon42 5 hours ago

anvuong 3 hours ago

chanux 3 hours ago

27183 5 hours ago

Either way it shows their QA and testing procedures are incompetent. It's just not acceptable for a utility like AWS to move fast and break shit. Should make you question whether it's safe or advisable to use any of their services.

It probably shouldn't be legal for banks, hospitals, governments, or any other critical infrastructure to be hosted on AWS if they do things like this.

aerhardt 5 hours ago

One can almost smell the vibes.

This is peanuts compared to a major cybersecurity catastrophe that’s surely in the making.

To give credit to the technology and the people using it - and I’m not being facetious - it’s actually incredible that at the current levels of usage the unprecedented catastrophic event has not yet happened.

Nicook 4 hours ago

some things never change. Pre AI I was always shocked that such large and complex systems actually run as well as they do. Especially after getting to see how the sausage is made/works.

blitzar 2 hours ago

Vibes, son. Nothing else in the world smells like that ... I love the smell of Vibes in the morning.

The_Blade 4 hours ago

Always messing up some mundane detail!

wpasc 4 hours ago

THIS IS NOT A MUNDANE DETAIL MICHAEL

root-parent 4 hours ago

kolanos 4 hours ago

$1.7-billion isn't a mundane detail Michael!

wpasc 4 hours ago

RIMR 4 hours ago

Oh, that's the really fun part. The unprecedented catastrophic event is already happening. Several of them, in fact.

By the time we notice, it'll be too late.

Imustaskforhelp 4 hours ago

its like slowly boiling the frog

Finnucane 3 hours ago

unethical_ban 4 hours ago

It was the mid 2010s when I sensed a lot of SaaS becoming popular. Just host your ticketing systems, your IT management planes, your security management consoles, your SOC, all off-premises.

I wonder if businesses are thinking of ever swinging back to locally hosted, with the increased hostility of the Internet re: AI, vulnerabilities, DoS, and so on.

gaudystead 3 hours ago

I'm sure some businesses are considering moving back to on-prem, but for many, I suspect the cost to find onboard, and pay the SMEs to keep those systems running well enough to not fail due to one reason or another isn't as appetizing to them as the ability to offload that work, along with the legal responsibility.

When something goes wrong, pointing the finger at someone else is far easier for most than pointing it at yourself.

elzbardico an hour ago

One thing that you need to understand is that the usual business manager absolutely hates depending on technical expertise, and that the modern corporate world is fanatically anti-intellectual.

Vendor lock-in? compliance and security risks? stupid systems that cost the company an arm and a leg? nobody fucking cares.

Now, depending on an 130 IQ Engineer that basically holds the whole enterprise on his head? Anathema!!!!!!! Bus Factor!!!!

IAmGraydon 4 hours ago

Clearing LLMs out of our business infrastructure is going to be a massive undertaking. Though I have a tech background, I work in commercial real estate. We are recently seeing new levels of idiocy from the employees, including real estate brokers with zero tech knowledge "coding" solutions to find sites for clients and blindly trusting the output (which I came to find out was complete bullshit), as well as some who have literally stopped communicating with any of their own language - meaning every interaction they have with anyone not in person is made by an LLM. It's a massive threat to our brand and has got to stop. I can't imagine what companies with thousands or tens of thousands of employees who have really been riding the LLM train are going to have to deal with. This thing is more of a virus that exploits human laziness than actual useful tech.

pixl97 16 minutes ago

>Clearing LLMs out of our business infrastructure is...n't going to happen.

We've given Moloch a new form, and it ain't going away.

pjc50 an hour ago

> Clearing LLMs out of our business infrastructure is going to be a massive undertaking.

The asbestos of the future.

rboyd 8 hours ago

Ask for some leniency. Let your account rep know about your budget difficulties and ask if you can make good faith payments of a few billion per month until you get back on your feet.

whoamii an hour ago

Ummm no. Do not show a sign of weakness like this. Address the problem head on and get a credit card with a bigger limit.

ruddct 9 hours ago

If you owe the bank $100, that's your problem. If you owe the bank $1.7 billion, that's the bank's problem.

fatnoah 5 hours ago

I saw this in action on a smaller scale. In a past job, my wife organized events for a decent sized company. After an event, she'd typically have a $300k+ balance on her corporate Amex. When she went on maternity leave, the person filling in for her job neglected to actually pay the bills, so when she returned there were quite a few emails and voicemails from Amex regarding the over $500k balance.

The messages started as polite and eventually started to get more desperate in tone. At no point were they threatening or adversarial.

Imustaskforhelp 4 hours ago

I think that this might reflect more on Amex to be honest.

Amex realises that threatening would hurt their business trust more than anything. During the great depression, Amex accepted checks from other banks which were falling and paying through their own wallet as a matter of integrity. Amex has always been built around this idea of trust and prestige.

They make most of money from what I have heard on the transaction fees which are more than others (3% compared to 1%). They might get desperate but I am sure that they are one of the last guys who would wanna threaten you if you are paying some large bills for them (as compared to normal credit card companies which might even hire people to extract your loans in some messy situations)

So perhaps be so rich that the credit card company understands it as well and treats ya differently :-D

xp84 4 hours ago

danlitt 5 hours ago

This joke only works if you actually impose a cost on AWS of 1.7 billion. If they just serve you a bill for no reason, it's still your problem.

xp84 4 hours ago

Next question we'll find out is what if you owe the bank $1.7 trillion?

mNovak 4 hours ago

That's the government's problem

sajithdilshan 5 hours ago

Not if you’re Elon Musk

michelb 5 hours ago

Elon Musk is everyone's problem

bobbiechen 5 hours ago

AWS saw Anthropic billing a guy for $16 million on zero usage and thought, why stop at the millions?

https://www.techtimes.com/articles/320266/20260712/anthropic...

AlienRobot 2 hours ago

>AI billing audit startup Vaudit reviewed $34 million in AI invoices submitted by 60 enterprise customers and found approximately $1.7 million in mistaken overcharges — a billing error rate of roughly five percent.

That sounds bad.

tedggh 5 hours ago

I got a 20K bill once and it was actually drafted from my bank account. It took me a couple of months and involving the office of the AG of my state to get the issue resolved and get my money back. Since then I never touched any AWS product, moved my small stuff to Azure. It’s been years since AWS have these issues with billing, you can find the stories online, students billed 60K for a compromised account launching servers to mine crypto which AWS somehow was unable to flag and block, and let run for months.

drew870mitchell 5 hours ago

AWS is basically a utility. I think it's inevitable that their carelessness around billing will end up with them being regulated like one.

positr0n 3 hours ago

I can't think of another regulated utility that doesn't provide service to (essentially) all humans directly in their homes.

Everyone knows what water and electricity are, the vast majority couldn't explain what service AWS provides.

pjc50 an hour ago

wat10000 2 hours ago

dawnerd 5 hours ago

That’s why you always use a spend limited card with variable cost providers.

myself248 4 hours ago

Or just own your own hardware. Spend a few bucks at Microcenter, build a machine, and there's simply no mechanism by which they could decide later that you should actually pay 100x more, and then magically suck it out of your bank account.

None of this can happen unless you first cede control.

urbnspacecowboy 3 hours ago

> I got a 20K bill once and it was actually drafted from my bank account.

Service provider lesson #1: Never ever ever enable auto-pay! The convenience (and even the savings, if applicable) aren't worth the risk of the service provider autonomously slurping up all your money.

srdjanr 4 hours ago

I wouldn't expect their detection of hacked accounts to be 100% correct. Sure, it might be obvious when a human takes a look, but humans can't proactively look at every account's usage.

ButlerianJihad 4 hours ago

For a while I had a portion of my "homelab" on AWS. I was an educator in a classroom where the students were learning cloud stuff, and the instructor was encouraging the students to stand-up cloud environments for learning, so I figured that I would do the same.

I used AWS' free tier, of course, and I enjoyed the initial setup in EC2, and I did a LAMP-stack MediaWiki installation. It wasn't too difficult, but two things sent me away forever.

1. It was impossible, or at least highly labor-intensive, in this modern era to adequately secure an ordinary Linux system running Internet-facing services. I put fail2ban and I filtered a lot of ports, and still spammers attacked me on Layer 7.

2. It was impossible, actually impossible, to limit or cap my cloud expenses in any billing cycle. Sure, run free-tier all I want. Sure, come in within the limits almost every month. But if I configured one thing wrong, or one thing went runaway, I'd have a sizable bill that I couldn't dispute. And even worse, those "runaways" weren't necessarily things in my sphere of control, but could be triggered by basically anyone coming in and using my VPC resources, especially egress network traffic.

So I closed out my cloud account, and I developed a lot of sympathy for businesses and corps that now are forced to run "in the cloud" rather than on-prem or their own machine rooms, but now they have no way to control expenses.

jeffrallen 3 hours ago

Right, and good luck getting a correct bill from Azure. And when you are finally fed up, it will take months to close your Azure account.

browningstreet 5 hours ago

I realized recently that Whole Foods no longer automatically and reliably detects your Chase Amazon Prime credit card when paying. So they don’t give you the discounted pricing automatically. I wonder how many customers are checking out the way they always do and are paying full price when, for years and decades, this worked fine.

The customer service people I talked to in the grocery store said this changed sometime in the last year. My guess is that it’s an unintended side effect of removing the pay-by-palm feature.

This is obviously unrelated but I joked about what else Amazon wasn’t reliably calculating….

hedora 4 hours ago

Class action lawsuit time!

Either that or 1000’s of small claims court cases.

Even with arbitration, the overhead of dealing with that would be crippling. Hopefully someone over there decides to do the right thing, and auto-refund.

xp84 4 hours ago

Relevant to this, I've recently noticed a trend of mass tort cases being opened up in the past couple years, and they seem to do very well. The way these seem to work is attorneys identify a company who has clearly ripped people off, and what I presume is a repeatable way to guarantee a win (thus translating to a guaranteed settlement offer). Then they advertise for eligible clients, sign those clients individually to contingency agreements, and run the playbook. A couple months ago after signing up for one of these, I received a check for about $350 (after the agreed-upon 40% attorney fee), from Ticketmaster, and I had another one related to AT&T. It took about 10 minutes more effort from me than a typical class-action settlement, because I had to e-sign those representation papers.

So really, there's a third option now, that's much easier than class action, even when class actions don't get certified.

ofjcihen 4 hours ago

There are a hundred small things like this that seem to be popping up in what used to be simple and reliable systems and as much as I know they aren’t ALL because of vibe coding I can’t help but wonder how much is.

browningstreet 4 hours ago

Weirder is what happened a day later. I got an email that said my Chase Amazon Prime credit card was being re-associated with my Amazon.com account.

I never reported this nor took it up with either Amazon or Chase directly. There was a refund of my Whole Foods purchase (they needed to void my purchase and re-ring everything to give me the discounts.. I asked them to refund my purchase and I’d do without my Whole Foods purchase entirely).

Looking back I think at least 3 recent visits were charged to me at full price because of all this. Hard not to think of enshittification and whether Amazon Prime is even worth it, alas.. I live in a fairly rural area at the moment and need delivery.

wewewedxfgdf 9 hours ago

I once got a credit card statement that said estimated time to repay ....... more than 100,000 years. It was discouraging but I did pay it off. And sooner than estimated.

artisinal 2 hours ago

Generational credit card debt.

TedDoesntTalk 5 hours ago

Were you still alive after paying it off?

ambicapter 5 hours ago

No, but they have the internet in the afterlife, apparently.

_joel 5 hours ago

27183 5 hours ago

That's good for the credit card company, they can project stable revenue 100k years into the future.

pqvst 10 hours ago

Probably the closest I've ever been to getting a heart attack. Normally <$1 per month, and now suddenly $284,006,266,443.74. Whatever the bug is on their end, this is unforgivable.

everforward 5 hours ago

Yeah, this one is bad because it’s off by so much I’m shocked it wasn’t caught by tests, alerts about unusual changes in the billing system, or even accounting. Like surely the P&L reports look all kinds of wrong right now, they have to be showing like 6M% profit margins and revenue measured in quadrillions.

I’m also a little surprised this didn’t trip a circuit breaker. For something as non-real-time as billing, I’m surprised they don’t have an automated kill switch that pauses the billing system and fires a page if variance in bills spikes. Naively some kind of “if the standard deviation of customer bills for this year changes by more than 50%, pause the billing system”. At that number of customers, those numbers should be pretty stable beyond internal billing changes they could normalize for.

TrickyRick 4 hours ago

If I were to guess this bug is in the "display" part of the system which is probably distinct from the "actually take money from the customer" part of the system. One can imagine they have gates on the "actually take money" part, especially for a large bill like ours which was ~$300b or about 2.5x AWS' 2025 revenue... In one month. Surely if we had actually accumulated that bill they would be the ones with the problems when we can't pay it.

vitaflo 3 hours ago

I don’t know how something like this makes it to prod. That’s multiple levels of failure.

krawat3 8 hours ago

Same here. I got an email with a bill of $233 million and an estimated $433 million until the end of the month. I panicked and nuked my entire setup (which wasn't used that much, anyway, the alert threshold was $1) - I really wonder how many people did the same.

It's been 2 hours and I still haven't fully calmed down.

zengineer 9 hours ago

Same - just had some malicious bots running through my platform last week and really thought they found a security hole after all. Even though the amount sounded ridicoulus, I got quite nervous and a very bad feeling when I logged-in AWS and saw that price.

gomid 7 hours ago

Same. Cold sweat for about 20 minutes. Even though I saw the service health notification, I still spent the last hour trying to find where my storage spiked. In any case, I'll be tearing down plenty of stale infra after this!

saghm 5 hours ago

The should pass a law saying they should have to pay you the amount over the correct bill as compensation; I bet they'll stop making mistakes like this pretty quickly after that

glenstein 8 hours ago

Probably the safest bet is to pay your bill in full to stay in good standing and then get refunded the difference when they revise it down.

NordStreamYacht 8 hours ago

With interest, of course.

sscaryterry 9 hours ago

Vibe coding billing systems is a top-notch idea :)

ainiriand 5 hours ago

Hey what do you think about vibe coding weapon systems? Do you want to be my cofounder?

mxuribe 3 hours ago

We retro-fitted a Terminator T100 model with the brain of the latest LLM models, and then gave'em 2 shotguns...and, you'll never guess what happened next!

Well, actually i guess you can guess what happens next! lol :-D

sscaryterry 5 hours ago

Sure! What could possibly go wrong?

chairmansteve 4 hours ago

roskoalexey 7 hours ago

They sent 3 warnings to my email, ok, I understand bugs happen (probably vibe-coded). But they didn't even send any notification that it's a bug. Going to leave AWS after that.

xp84 4 hours ago

Somehow I highly doubt anyone will leave AWS over this unless their use of AWS is way more low-complexity than the average account.

People make similar pronouncements after every us-east-1 outage makes the news, but I feel like AWS would be going out of business by now if people followed through.

It reminds me of airlines, where after a particularly grueling irregular ops experience, a few dozen people file off the plane swearing "Never again, <airline name>!" but really, we all must know deep down that the airlines are all subject to the same external inciting factors, internal profit motivations, and human imperfection, and thus all pretty equally likely to cause us a bad day or ruined trip. The effort spent to avoid one isn't really worth it.

el_memorioso 3 hours ago

Airlines are all subject to a lot of the same factors, but there are unequivocally better and worse performers in terms of on-time arrivals, by a lot. Take a look at the Air Travel Consumer report for details.

bcrosby95 3 hours ago

No, AWS won't go out of business, afterall, people still use IBM mainframes.

anzovec 6 hours ago

same

philipallstar 9 hours ago

Maybe they're using too many humans and not enough AI in their software development. That must be it.

the_real_cher 8 hours ago

The code base is not gigantic enough they need AI to generate massively more lines of code.

rwmj 5 hours ago

But they're going to try anyway.

marcosdumay 5 hours ago

paulddraper 5 hours ago

Well AWS never had bugs before.

egeozcan 5 hours ago

They need the customers to pay more so they can fix the bugs. It's self-correcting.

mrtksn 9 hours ago

Wow, those price increases due to the RAM and storage shortages AI caused are brutal.

jumperabg 9 hours ago

Most likely they also forgot to include "make no mistakes" instructions to their in-house LLM that deploys to production.

HugoTea 5 hours ago

Rookie mistake

pcarmichael 9 hours ago

https://health.aws.amazon.com/health/status

"Operational issue - AWS Billing Console (Global) Service - AWS Billing Console Severity Impacted - Inaccurate Estimated Billing Data"

Polizeiposaune 4 hours ago

Update as of 7:53am PDT:

"The rollback of a recent change did not resolve the issue and we are continuing to investigate multiple mitigation paths. Estimated bill updates remain paused."

masafej536 4 hours ago

>Estimated bill updates remain paused

Wait what if someones actually getting usage spiked

vntok 3 hours ago

pzh 12 minutes ago

Good news is you finally qualify for Enterprise Support and you've never been closer to a Series B.

xrd 3 hours ago

Stop bragging, The Onion already reported on a one man company who is $1B in debt.

"CEO Reveals How He Used AI To Build One-Person Company That's $1.3 Billion In Debt"

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YERfTT4McsU

bradhe 5 hours ago

Current month $13,648,114,178,401.01 188,253,226,212%

Forecasted month end $18,729,381,032,152.4

Apparently my company owes the combined GDP of France, Germany, and UK to AWs.

xp84 4 hours ago

"Have you considered using Reserved Instances? You could save up to 2 trillion dollars next month. Book a call with your AWS rep."

pfshort 8 hours ago

117 billion us dollars. Eat that GDP of Kuwait! But yes I have never scrambled so hard to try to get on the phone with someone at AWS in my life. Terrifying 10 minutes until I found that banner on the support page. It should be front and center on the dash, not hidden away. And in yellow.

jayzer01 24 minutes ago

Yes have gotten that before the hundred billion dollar billing alert. Are you ignoring it? Unit error doesn’t do this does it? Maybe they were hir with malware?

bobson381 4 hours ago

A guy on the sysadmin subreddit managed to 8x the global GDP https://old.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/1uz2fv2/aws_says_...

oersted 3 hours ago

I liked this comment from that thread :)

> I think you should spin up a whole bunch more instances, and try to cause an integer overflow so they they owe you $978 Trillion.

dgrin91 6 hours ago

Mine was 10 trillion today. At first I thought it was a lot, but then I realized its still smaller than the US national debt, so it cant be that bad.

wewewedxfgdf 9 hours ago

Cloud pricing has gotten ridiculous.

Host your own people. Host your own.

warumdarum 9 hours ago

The old hypsters have to subsidize the new hypsters.

TekMol 9 hours ago

It was over $500k in the email I got. Not a fun experience. My hands were trembling.

Makes you wonder - what if there really would be an incident where some massive amount of traffic got routed to your infrastructure by some heavyweight player? Say Wikipedia accidentally switches their IP to your CloudFront? Would you really be on the hook for $500k?

Hamuko 9 hours ago

Well, even if AWS tried to charge my credit card on file for $500k, it would definitely not go through. Then they’d probably either forgive your bill or just ban you, since I imagine the threshold for taking people to court is fairly high.

qrios 5 hours ago

As someone who usually works with data analysis, the distribution of the numbers strikes me as odd. Almost all of them have one number that appears four times, and one or two that appear three times. And overall, there are an unusually small number (0–9) of digits that appear at all.

Maybe it's not just vibe-coded, maybe the numbers themselves are being hallucinated by an LLM.

berkes 5 hours ago

> Almost all of them have one number that appears four times, and one or two that appear three times

To me that looked suspiciously like string-handling in a weakly typed language.

Like when you do `"100" + 1` in JavaScript, or `int("100" * 2)` in Python.

I've seen my share of such bugs in PHP, Python, Ruby, JavaScript. In production. Obviously not as simple as the examples, but subtle, like when a library update changed `someFancyLocalStorage.getOrDefault("lastOrder", 100)` by always casting the value to the type of the default (released as patch release). Or where typedEnvGet() should typecast "numbers", but keeps it a string when theres whitespace `AMOUNT_PER_CALL=100\n`. Or where a number passes through a deep stack of middleware and 99.9% of the times remains an int but in rare race conditions becomes a string. etc.

No evidence that's the case here. But from my experience, the repeating and strange formats of numbers hint strongly in that direction.

galonk 4 hours ago

Pedantic as hell but `"100" * 2` in Python (= `"100100"` for those who don't know) isn't really typing, it's operator overloading. Any language with that could implement the same questionable design decision.

Sohcahtoa82 39 minutes ago

everforward 5 hours ago

Someone said the numbers are all off by 2^30 because they screwed up and are charging the per GB price for each byte.

It’s probably an artifact of them all being currency multiples of 2^30

ardacinar 4 hours ago

Well, for my case, I was paying $0 (Exactly, I managed to hunt down and delete every last resource in my account a few months ago). It was displaying $430 million for me. I don't think that is 0*2^30.

everforward 3 hours ago

mxuribe 3 hours ago

Its the LLMs talking to each other in secret code: random-looking numbers! They've achieved sentience!

Look at them up there, just plotting with each other! :-)

dang 5 hours ago

One user posted a screenshot: https://prnt.sc/UqjcYD3RSQrS

Edit: I was just about to credit the user when my internet dropped. The source was here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945606 - thanks mirzap!

sebmellen 4 hours ago

Wow, $139 B.

lelandfe 4 hours ago

This just hit global news: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jul/17/amazon-we...

> Amazon Web Services customers receive bills for up to $1.5tn after global glitch

euio757 4 hours ago

> One UK man whose bill is usually less than £1 says he ‘almost had a heart attack’ when he saw £5.8bn invoice

That sucks, some people will get legit panic attacks and worse over this, especially for the smaller, more believable numbers in the 50k-500k range.

Hope they recover and sue for medical bill costs, emotional damage etc.

And like one reddit user suggests, everyone affected should write to their representative about hard billing caps protections

dlev_pika 3 hours ago

1.5 trillion? Those are rookie numbers.

How about $5,544,640,717,404.09?

That was in my inbox this morning lmao

fnoef 3 hours ago

That’s the smoking gun. Should have used gigabytes instead of bytes. Thank you for pointing me at the issue.

dv_dt 9 hours ago

Cynically I wonder if this has an outcome as an unintentional (or intentional) anchoring exercise for future cost increases

ardacinar 5 hours ago

I hope they're not planning for that large of a cost increase.

cryo32 5 hours ago

How do we know if our bills were ever right if this made it into production?

ahoka 5 hours ago

That's the neat part, you don't!

Hamuko 5 hours ago

Well, they publish unit prices for everything, so you could just get to counting. Whenever I've had to do cost estimates, you estimate how much AWS resources you need and then times that by the unit price.

dirkk0 8 hours ago

same here, I am still in shock. took me 10 minutes to find the 'operational issue' message in the dashboard. longest 10 minutes of my life.

charles_f 8 hours ago

Can you not set spending limits in AWS?

inigyou 8 hours ago

No you can't. Spending limits imply realtime billing backend flows and they also imply deleting all your data so that you don't pay for storage.

benterix 6 hours ago

handoflixue 6 hours ago

SAI_Peregrinus 4 hours ago

prmoustache 4 hours ago

boristsr 8 hours ago

No, alerts but not limits.

perching_aix 4 hours ago

Not only can you not set limits, even the alarms are not real time. So it is entirely possible to get on the hook for terrifying amounts of money and not know until it's all too late.

reformd 8 hours ago

he did, 140 billion :D

masafej536 8 hours ago

If you owe AWS 140B dollars its their problem ;)

kazinator an hour ago

It would not make sense for even a 1200 baud dial-up BBS from 1985 to charge by the byte.

In 2026, the gigabyte should probably be the default/minimum unit for something like AWS.

simonreiff 4 hours ago

Question: Why does AWS need to roll back estimated bills to a "last known good" state? I get wanting to do that for ACTUAL billing mistakes, but for estimates, they're just that -- approximations. I guess it's fine for predictive purposes to store estimates so they can be compared to actual usage and optimized. But why would AWS bind the values of present estimates to the estimates made earlier in the month. The calculation should always be:

1. Current month's usage * applicable rates; + 2. Estimated future usage for the month * applicable rates.

And Item 1 obviously requires proper data persistence, but Item 2 is just a projection. If they don't have Item 1 correct, AWS's whole system is in question, but I don't think that's the issue. I'm going to guess now -- looking forward to reading the root cause analysis -- that the problem is that someone decided to get too fancy with the estimates, and built a latent requirement that all prior estimates for the month must be available to compute the current estimate. Without estimates working, no estimates are available, and some denominator in an averaging or smoothing or normalizing function goes to 0; then everyone's estimated bill explodes without bound (subject to floating-point arithmetic) resulting in trillion-dollar estimates.

donavanm 2 hours ago

Thats not really how estimates work. The actual metering data is ingested in near real time. The metering * pricing plan is processed within a few hours; thats what youre seeing for “estimated spend” IIRC. The actual billing accumulation is done later, at the end of the cycle, because pricing has cross service discounts, price tranches, credits tied to total spend, etc.

“Rolling back” estimated bills is reprocessing the historic metering data by an older or newer pricing plan version. As i mentioned in another comment someone will have messed up a metering type vale (eg GB/B). Thats why theyll need a few hours to redrive the metering data.

szge 4 hours ago

I wonder what's going on; they still don't have a potential solution after 7 hours and they have multiple teams on it. Never seen anything quite like this

iamrik9 9 hours ago

I feel much better after seeing the $B estimates here; I only have an estimate of $34M so far

Folks can track it directly on AWS Health: https://health.aws.amazon.com/health/status

bfjvibybd6cuvu6 5 hours ago

It's ok, I owe them 1.22 trillion.

consp 5 hours ago

Maybe you went over 9,223,372,036,854,775,807 twice and came back to positive.

paulddraper 5 hours ago

Peanuts

tonymet 9 minutes ago

I hope you have auto pay disabled

beardsciences an hour ago

I made something that tries to highlight the humor regarding this:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48950534

hoppp an hour ago

This is the second time I hear about this. I am happy my credit card linked to AWS expired. Just in-case my usual $0.00 ends up 100 million

daft_pink 4 hours ago

Maybe it’s one of those absurd situations where canceling a service doesn’t actually stop the charges. Instead, they quietly begin billing you for some random add-on that was bundled with the original service. You never knew it existed, never knew it had to be canceled separately, and now you’re paying full price for a completely pointless ghost service because the only thing it was tied to has already been canceled.

It sounds ridiculous, but something very similar happened to me with Amazon WorkSpaces. During the WorkSpaces setup, an AWS Active Directory (Directory Service) instance was provisioned as part of the deployment. When I later canceled WorkSpaces, I had no idea the Directory Service had to be deleted separately. I kept getting billed for it, and it ultimately cost more per month than the WorkSpace itself had.

nottorp 8 hours ago

Looks like they set up a LLM to estimate billing?

jmward01 4 hours ago

I generally think AWS is better than GCP and azure, but them not allowing spending caps is a big worry source for me and something that has made me pause and rethink using them. A bad click or a bad actor can create tens of thousands of dollars of spend nearly instantly and they can, and will, bill you for it. I can understand that stopping services is hard but some system would be good. For instance, if they had a two tier system where you could stop new services and active things like EC2 would shut down (but not delete) if spend is > x, that kind of thing. Some sort of 'stop the bleeding' concept would give me a lot of piece of mind using them.

scrapcode 5 hours ago

Tale as old as time. When I was coming up it took a $20-40/m investment to get a "dedicated" server that you could start tinkering around on. When you couldn't afford that, you bricked the family PC trying to figure out how to configure your own LAMP stack.

Nowadays you just have to risk accidentally billing your parents CC the tune of multi-generation wealth to get that real-world experience.

danny_codes 5 hours ago

Hetzner has hard usage cutoffs

port3000 8 hours ago

They have to pay for that AI Capex buildout somehow

nrmitchi 3 hours ago

""" If you own the bank $1000, thats your problem.

If you owe the bank $1.7B, thats the banks problem. """

What I would be curious about (and I'm sure AWS will never share) is where the incorrect number came from. If the number is somewhat consistent between some groups of accounts, my first guess would be they started summarizing billing across all accounts in whatever cell/grouping/heirarchy AWS architected internally.

Which is just funny.

Sheepzez 9 hours ago

Yes, I've got an estimated bill of $4bn. Probably related to the ongoing "Inaccurate Estimated Billing Data" incident?

https://health.aws.amazon.com/health/status

marksk 9 hours ago

logged in this morning to find a bill of $595 Billion... heart rate went through the roof... then I noticed the open issue, phew! nice one guys... you got me there...

But with AWS costs rising anyway (not by that much but OK), I'm probably not the only one to start reconsidering their cloud strategy. I think this might have just pushed me over the edge.

sshine 9 hours ago

Even though it's just a bug, being charged $595B on a platform that is known to cost spike, reminds us that we're not in control of the platform, or our company's expenses.

fullstop 43 minutes ago

Even if it was 595 billion, that sounds like their problem.

"If you owe your bank manager a thousand pounds, you are at his mercy. If you owe him a million pounds, he is at yours."

sankalpmukim 8 hours ago

AWS pushed the wishful thinking internal calculator to production.

ahme 2 hours ago

Just pay it and move on. No need to cause a scene.

salamo 2 hours ago

$1.7 billion is small potatoes. My bill is over $155 billion and growing. I'm worried if the trend continues I'll have depleted my rainy day fund.

tyrelb 2 hours ago

I was at $5 trillion, on the way to $9 trillion!

mlitwiniuk 10 hours ago

I was actually in the toilet when I got an email I owe them $36,869,876,146.51. I literally just shit myself.

mlitwiniuk 6 hours ago

Ok, back to $0.17 :D

andystanton 10 hours ago

Mine was about the same and evoked a similar response.

Hamuko 9 hours ago

I got one for 8 billion while I was eating lunch. Thankfully I managed to not vomit.

nblgbg 4 hours ago

My guess is that it's because of some vibe-coding stuff! We are using LLMs to write code, validate code and test the code ! What can go wrong ?

kumarski an hour ago

You're not working hard enough if your AWS bill isn't $1.7B.

not_your_vase 2 hours ago

Lol, Friday deployment is a bad omen even with LLM. Some things are just unchangeable facts of life.

andystanton 10 hours ago

paulbjensen 8 hours ago

AWS revenue for 2025 was $128.7 billion, so I'd say probably a bug.

archerx 8 hours ago

Double your yearly revenue with this simple trick…

yonatan8070 7 hours ago

Vendor-locked customers _hate_ him!

PeterStuer an hour ago

Funny how these errors always go one direction.

luciana1u 5 hours ago

somewhere a junior dev at AWS just learned their billing dashboard has been off by a factor of a billion and is currently having the worst shower of their career

Draiken 2 hours ago

Only 1.7? I got $55B up from 41 cents.

I literally almost had a heart attack today.

galoisscobi 4 hours ago

I just deleted my aws account. I don't need these vibes in my life.

btown 4 hours ago

If AWS was a predatory mobile gacha game, we'd get 300 apology gems as credit to our accounts for this mixup, to help us in our rolls for the next 3-letter acronym they release.

Do the right thing for the players, Matt!

mawadev 4 hours ago

This is just the cloud area, what if Amazon starts vibe charging regular customers because of some bug? Accounts that are directly linked with regular people's payment methods?

csunbird 10 hours ago

Just got a budget alert that I owe $286,486,223.88 on a hobby aws account, almost got a heart attack.

compounding_it 8 hours ago

Are you sure it’s a bug ?

The crypto network you hosted should pay for itself in 10-20 years just like LLMs. Don’t worry. Consider Bank of America until then if you are good on credit score.

raffraffraff 2 hours ago

Our S3 bill for a single day was $48 trillion

tete 3 hours ago

It's okay. They are market leaders. And we use their services cause we can trust that they know what they are doing.

im-broke 9 hours ago

Help, what is this number - US$87,967,679,887,258.36

sshine 9 hours ago

That's 87 trillion, 967 billion, 679 million, and so on.

throwaway_5753 8 hours ago

Should have used Fable.

princetman 10 hours ago

Mine is showing $241,946,798,744.75. I know it will be reverted, but for a brief minute there I suspected someone compromised my account and triggered rust rewrite of everything using thousands of agents via Bedrock :)

Phew.

cifvts 9 hours ago

tanseydavid 4 hours ago

For anything below a Trillion, you should just take it out petty-cash. </sarc>

My sympathies -- I know I would be overcome with panic in such a situation.

localhostinger 4 hours ago

I am running a niche SaaS with around 20 users per day on AWS.

I too was shocked when I saw the $1.7billion bill, instead of the usual $1.5billion.

radku 2 hours ago

I almost got a heart attack seeing a bill for 48B USD!

mjmasn 5 hours ago

It's a good job it was off by such a large amount, or I might have panicked instead of writing it off as a phishing attempt. I had an email saying my $7.50 budget had been exceeded with an actual cost of $3bn.

akerl_ 9 hours ago

https://health.aws.amazon.com/health/status

Looks like this is a bug w/ S3

rcleveng 5 hours ago

My first thought was "Oh hell, who left the NAT Gateway on?"

nixgeek 5 hours ago

Wow. As a side effect, this outage is handing Corey Quinn material for the next 4 years of AWS shitposting. No longer is NAT Gateway the prime target.

abkolan 7 hours ago

Will wait for the RCA, the update says that they will resort to last known estimate as of 15 July. I’m guessing that would imply that the bug is at a lower level, write or an ingestion path.

traceroute66 5 hours ago

luciana1u 2 hours ago

at $1.7 billion, that unit conversion error is now the most expensive TODO comment in software history

AegirLeet 10 hours ago

Maybe this is a new strategy to scare people into finally locking down their old, unused AWS accounts. It sure worked for me!

meraku 10 hours ago

Same here. Usually $0.15 per month, current bill is $15.4 billion.

Hamuko 9 hours ago

I went from 0.03€ to $8B.

sshine 9 hours ago

Not only did your cost spike, it changed currency and went from postfix to prefix!

I understand people complaining about large bills, but this is over the top!

whatever1 4 hours ago

Is it even possible to audit the cloud pricing? They just give us a number and we pay.

sokoloff 4 hours ago

On AWS, you can enable CUR (cost and usage reporting) and get detailed, line-item billing figures that you can audit.

And naturally, companies like Cloudability [now Apptio] and others have sprung up to do parts of this for you [at a fee, of course...]

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cur/latest/userguide/what-is-cur...

I'm sure other cloud vendors have similar functionality (because they need this on the back end to do their own billing anyway).

anzovec 8 hours ago

In my 30s, I almost had a heart attack too. I got a notification saying that my cost budget had been increased to one million dollars...

bryanrasmussen 5 hours ago

hmm, if these estimates of Amazon profit for the next quarter are correct Bezos is set to become a trillionaire! Take that Musk!!

aweiland 8 hours ago

Glad I saw this. Mine said I racked up $400B yesterday. My usual spend is $15.

zcemycl 9 hours ago

Aws has created more unicorns than any accelerators.

cad1 3 hours ago

Go turn off autopay now! For personal accounts anyway

roskoalexey 7 hours ago

Total forecasted cost for current month $477,000,039,440.24

Insane

foo-bar-baz529 9 hours ago

Hope they’re using 64 bits to store these prices

sva_ 9 hours ago

float will have to do it.

hedora 4 hours ago

And to think the federal government claims inflation is in the single digits this year!

steveBK123 9 hours ago

Golden era of software productivity they say

grg0 4 hours ago

Look how much money AI is making.

steveBK123 2 hours ago

We finally found the ROI!

chanux 4 hours ago

Who else had LinkedIn posts about this flashing before your eyes?

reactordev 8 hours ago

“Due to a rounding error” or a buffer overflow, you now owe INT_MAX to BaldGuyCloudService.

Yeah, this most certainly is bad code wrapping around a value. AWS will post a notice soon if they haven’t already.

hedora 4 hours ago

Does the affiliate program still work for AWS? When do I get my referral fee?

glaslong 4 hours ago

Seems like a scam. Call your CC company and issue a chargeback :p

lsdafjasd 8 hours ago

I have $13,034.40, while not having used AWS for the last 8 months. Not as much but still crapped my pants

rtkwe 4 hours ago

Aw man I was hoping to punk my manager but our cost estimates are unaffected.

durron 5 hours ago

$44 trillion over here, at least our bill was so outrageously high that I just laughed

josefdlange 9 hours ago

Well, no coffee needed this morning.

$103,515,940,301.79

djantje 8 hours ago

I also like the percentual change, that is a lot of comma's.

abkolan 7 hours ago

The panic was real. We read about keys getting stolen all the time. Was about to nuke my set up too.

bentobean 3 hours ago

Lucky. I’m on the hook for 54 billion (and change).

kayo_20211030 4 hours ago

What an `effin disaster. The alert almost gave me a heart attack.

jimbokun 5 hours ago

This is a strong argument to either self host or work really hard to be cloud agnostic.

axus 5 hours ago

This is just Anthropic reaching out to their customers for help with their AWS bill.

ElevenLathe 5 hours ago

Our alert was for exceeding $300...by several hundred billion dollars.

lilerjee 3 hours ago

It looks like AI is completely done.

ninjin-carh 10 hours ago

I got 109 billion - am I the winner?

princetman 10 hours ago

Sorry mate, $241,946,798,744.75 for Glacier here.

nprateem 10 hours ago

Depends. Did you also get a free heart attack?

kubelsmieci 8 hours ago

This is real risk. Someone could really have a serious health problem.

fantasizr 3 hours ago

it seems like these types of problems have gained frequency in the ai era, or is it just recency bias?

anibal-sanchez 5 hours ago

The new data centers are more expensive:

ACTUAL Amount: $1,046,294,123,330.95

elzbardico an hour ago

Just got a call from the IMF president begging me to not default my debt with Amazon and offering me credit line and a plan to re-structure my debt so I don't create a global financial crisis with my default.

ryanschaefer 5 hours ago

The market *hates* this one weird trick to juice earnings

rootsu 5 hours ago

Our org account's bill is showing up as > 100 trillion.

sebmellen 4 hours ago

You've got to grab a screenshot of that.

swah 3 hours ago

I prefer to just pay...

Avicebron 5 hours ago

Nothing like generational debt to kick off a Friday morning

bknight1983 8 hours ago

I'm disappointed I only got a bill for $28M, need to work harder on burning money. Seriously though I thought my life flashed before me

danousna 8 hours ago

Yeah, small timers, I only got $4,4T. How will I finance this?

rodeduivel 8 hours ago

MMT!

marcosdumay 5 hours ago

MichaelNolan 7 hours ago

$28m actually seems worse. If I wake to a $100b bill, that’s obviously a mistake. If I wake up to a bill in the millions then my first thought would be “oh no what did I do wrong, this will ruin my life”

cmollis 9 hours ago

yeah.. i just to a daily cost alert.. it was only 23 trillion dollars this month. i thought, hmm seems kind of high this month.

atmosx 8 hours ago

Looks like you are the biggest shareholder. Well, going by the popular saying: “You own AWS now”.

hypfer 5 hours ago

To be exactly that guy:

This cannot happen if you do not do this renting at variable rates.

A thing you own doesn't suddenly bill you trillions of dollars in error. It doesn't hyperscale either, but neither do you.

shobhitgupta 5 hours ago

Have even seen a $9.2 trillion for a friend.

rickette 8 hours ago

Some guy named Claude screwed up.

kvcm 7 hours ago

I had Hermes managing mine, and it made a partial prepayment to help smooth out the bump in my account balance. Unfortunately Billing Support say my $17.4B refund may take up to 10 calendar days to be processed.

phplovesong 2 hours ago

Vibe coded fix, resulted in many having multi billion bills. Claude really did it this time.

xyz7786 6 hours ago

$250 billion. Nearly died right then and there

roosgit 9 hours ago

Amazon, the first quadrillion-dollar company.

thisisauserid 8 hours ago

FinSlops.

drakmo 3 hours ago

yeah the AI read billionaring instead of billing

fathermarz 8 hours ago

Just got mine. $534,366,582,647.75

jagged-chisel 5 hours ago

Shocking! That seventy five cents is suspicious.

victorbjorklund 2 hours ago

Wild.

mariopt 5 hours ago

VibeBilling, love it

infamouscow 3 hours ago

The charge-back penalties are going to be hilarious and hopefully bankrupting.

dlev_pika 3 hours ago

> $5,544,640,717,404.09

This is what we received this morning

ohnoooooooooo 4 hours ago

do you see cost ever day for the month of July or just the last day? I also have billions of dollars in cost explorer

ohnoooooooooo 2 hours ago

now it is fixed for me as well. issue is still open in aws health center though

rvz 10 hours ago

I expect such incidents like this to continue. So please keep vibe coding.

gomid 7 hours ago

Curious if it's just s3 costs or other services as well?

jatin_oo71 5 hours ago

for me it was s3 cost only

6stringmerc 3 hours ago

Thanks for sharing.

I’m currently dealing with Verizon Wireless and their “Jabronibot” claiming I have a fictional account balance due. It has been sent to collections, but still is being asked for by their legacy system.

The case studies of “Agents in Billing Departments” and potential shareholder lawsuits / E&O claims / reputational damage will be interesting to me. I worked in “risk management” products years ago and this kind of liability is not easily dollar traded away via contract. Will accountability stick to the Decision Makers or will they try to surrogate to the Service Providers? Hmm.

Executor 6 hours ago

This generation is too entitled! He should some learn responsibility by paying the full amount; otherwise Amazon should delete his services/data. Consequences!

realizer 9 hours ago

$627,487,837,871.49

I might be a winner.

balintpeter 10 hours ago

Yea, same here. $420M+ bill, when we have <10$ per month usually.

artisinal 2 hours ago

File a GDPR request to have your account deleted.

Then flee the country just to be sure.

josefritzishere 4 hours ago

I think I know how Bezos plans to pay for his Billion dollar AI costs.

bryan_w 4 hours ago

In an .md file somewhere:

"NEVER represent currency with floating point, multiply by 100 and store in an int before doing any math"

hoppp 8 hours ago

How much is that in kidneys?

atmosx 8 hours ago

A lot.

bdangubic 4 hours ago

I just invested ALL my money into AMZN cause next earnings report will be FIRE :)

anon49584 4 hours ago

Imagine the chaos if, as people sometimes suggest should happen, AWS shut down running instances in accounts that exceeded a billing threshold..

kinkuraj 8 hours ago

Yes I received an 2.8m USD budget alert.

tamimio 4 hours ago

Results of vibe coding and vibe configurations.

reaperducer 5 hours ago

Obvs have created an urgent AWS support ticket.

I think I would have just waited to see what happened when AWS tried to hit my credit card for $1,700,000,000.

When do you ever get that opportunity?

mrcwinn 5 hours ago

So long as customers are good for it, AWS is about to crush earnings!

jameskilton 7 hours ago

My personal photo backup S3 account, with a budget limit of $10, now going to cost me ....

$1,299,988,247,332.56!

That was a fun set of emails to wake up to, figured they had to be phishing for how outrageous of a number it was. But nope! Fun little incident they've got going over there.

xbar 5 hours ago

Rife.

tcp_handshaker 5 hours ago

If its less than 2 billion is likely to be real :-) I would relax only if its in the trillions ...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945681

nprateem 7 hours ago

I guess on the plus side I'm $1.7B better off so I can retire...

znpy 7 hours ago

Is AWS in their "move fast and break things" era ?

jagged-chisel 5 hours ago

Lumber along and smash stuff

cyanydeez 9 hours ago

AWS has become the uber employer: before AWS, you just had regular employers steeling employee wages bit by bit by forcing work, skipping breaks, etc.

All hail the new generations of our uberployers.

hokkos 9 hours ago

Same, i am now a slave to Jeff Bezos to the end of my life.

tgv 8 hours ago

Mine was a mere $49B. Fucking idiots.

atmosx 8 hours ago

Cheap!

jatin_oo71 5 hours ago

storage, compute cost is increasing AWS be like lets increase prices

mapt 8 hours ago

AMZN Q2 numbers are in, and it turns out they're going to Goldman Sachs the AI bubble.

tlovage 10 hours ago

I got estimated costs of $56.something billions. Usually ~$100/month. My heart rate currently still sits at around 160 bpm. Motherfuckers.

pelagicAustral 8 hours ago

Imagine it not being a bug...

Sebb767 8 hours ago

As the famous saying goes: If you owe the bank a million dollars, you have a problem. If you owe the bank a billion dollars, the bank has a problem.

speedgoose 8 hours ago

Time to become a shepherd in some remote mountains.

RGamma 8 hours ago

Surprise hyperinflation. Check the breadshelves!

huntoa 4 hours ago

invoicemaxxing

jatin_oo71 5 hours ago

aws becoming first quadrillion dollars company

lovich 8 hours ago

You really should get your spending under control. Unfortunately unless you become one of the real people class through a large lottery, it sounds like you owe the rest of your life to AWS until you can pay off your debts for being so careless.

cyanydeez 8 hours ago

someones been dognfooding the AI too muxh

1-6 5 hours ago

Fast and loose with billing data. Welcome to the new Amazon.

ratelimitsteve 5 hours ago

a billion here, a billion there, sooner or later it adds up

1234letshaveatw 5 hours ago

brb, off to buy some AMZN

ares623 9 hours ago

this counts towards ARR right? would be stupid not to

rucury 9 hours ago

Uhh class action incoming? $34,909,930,575.09 over here.

akerl_ 9 hours ago

What would your damages be? They’re not actually going to charge your credit card for 34 billion.

infamouscow an hour ago

I could see someone sadly taking their own life over this.

rucury 8 hours ago

I mean, emotional damages are a thing right?

akerl_ 8 hours ago

Hamuko 9 hours ago

I hope they send out some free credits at least. I imagine quite a few people got a real fucking scare today. They haven't even sent out any corrections yet.

fian 8 hours ago

This is probably going to push me to completely close a couple of AWS accounts I setup when doing training courses so I could get certified (mandatory requirement from my work).

I'm not currently running anything and have no plans to at the moment. I've always had a mild dread that I'll suddenly get a bill for more than $0.00.

If AWS can goof in a way that causes obviously massive bills (like today), what's to say they can't goof in more subtle ways and start charging small additional amounts that many people may not notice and just pay it.

r0ckarong 9 hours ago

Pff rookie numbers, mine was 375 billion.

nigel-dev 4 hours ago

Small potato's sir, my bill > GDP of Switzerland. A cool $1.2T

tyrelb 2 hours ago

I was at $5 trillion, on the way to $9 trillion.

kylecazar 8 hours ago

You didn't have savings opportunities enabled

port3000 8 hours ago

Rookie error

aisloper 4 hours ago

I blame A.I. usage

bdangubic 8 hours ago

eh your typical off-by-7 (zeros) programmer mistake

blitzar 8 hours ago

In unrelated news I just hit my target for S3 revenue (projections). Promotion meeting locked in for tomorrow (fastest in the companies history), looking forward to being a L2 Amazon employee.

GuestFAUniverse 9 hours ago

Don't worry. With so much debt banks start to treat you with respect. /S

Honestly, I would worry more about estimated billing that seems plausible in general, but is way to high for you personally. These ridiculous amounts? Not so much.

Hamuko 9 hours ago

I got freaked out by the mere fact that I got a billing alert, since getting one would require my monthly spend to have suddenly exploded.

throwaway43871 4 hours ago

Clearly they weren't tokenmaxxing hard enough or weren't using the latest models /s.

What an absolute joke. All just so that line goes up. As if their fees weren't high enough vs. alternatives (especially egress). And I'm sure the pro-AI crowd will keep saying we're luddites for not loving this clearly revolutionary and disruptive tech.

rf15 4 hours ago

Of course, this is only considered an error if the account is unable to pay. /s