Hacker News

You will get MUCH more uptake and discussion if _you_ write that main github readme page. Many, and I’m becoming one too, won’t bother reading if you couldn’t be bothered to write.

Went through the Readme, the direction you point out is exciting but i still wonder what it communicates? would love to know your personal opinion what you try to accomplish here?

"That concentration is an architectural choice rather than a law of physics" except it's entirely based on the laws of physics. The closer you are, the faster the communication lane.

This seems a little, messy?

is the readme aimed at humans? because its a bit scatter gun.

Is it a model orchestrator? or a wrapper around docker/nix/cgroups+chroot?

Like what makes it an OS?

You rightly point out that shared memory across wifi/crappy ethernet is a bad idea, but then how do you get around that?

Wow. So this is what a codebase looks like if you just had "come up with 3 improvements" running in a loop.

TempleOS was more sane than whatever this is.

Curious about where this is most applicable

its so honest (3 matches), genuine (2 matches)

Calling this shit an OS, is a logic jump that no computer science engineer would do. But hey, we're living AI slop times.

What is the point of a "README" when no one is going to read that wall of slop.

As soon as I see the common AI fingerprints "No X, No Y", excessive use of commas, and extremely short sentences, it is likely that the author hasn't read the document and it now becomes a DONTREADME.

What in the AI slop?

I appreciate the attempt to hide the AI slop style of the documentation, but it still very difficult to read and understand.

[flagged]