Superconducting monolayer cuprate with a single CuO2 plane (nature.com)
58 points by sbulaev 4 days ago
gavinray 7 hours ago
> "a single layer of Bi2Sr2CuO6+δ (Bi-2201)"
I did not realize one could learn how much chemistry they did not know from a single name. "+δ" is one I've never seen before.pfdietz 6 hours ago
The material is doped by varying the overall oxidation state of the copper, which is balanced by the number of oxygen ions.
oliculipolicula 6 hours ago
iandanforth 9 hours ago
The writing here seems very odd. It reads like a product announcement or blog page, not an article in Nature. I'm left questioning its validity.
pama 9 hours ago
Hmm. I didn’t get that impression from a quick skim. Just curious: what makes you think that?
kzrdude 9 hours ago
I would guess it's the 'vast' and the 'unprecedented' for example.
scythe 3 hours ago
gestalt1 8 hours ago
ironqcold 8 hours ago
I noticed that too.The writing style itself seems a bit strange. I'm not deep into superconductors, so I can't judge the science itself but I have doubts about how much trust this article can give.
oliculipolicula 2 days ago
That was fun but this is gun?
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-026-03375-4
The two teams could "synergize" their tacit knowledge, overcome "involution"?
Without open peer review like in the old days it's hard, even with frontier models, for nonexperts to know if the above breakthrough was (unfairly?) relegated or how significant TFA is truly
BigTTYGothGF 22 minutes ago
> open peer review like in the old days it's hard
I'm not sure the old days ever had that.
dgellow 3 hours ago
In that case you can ignore the article, if it is really significant for layman you will see more articles in the coming weeks/months with simpler explanations