Linux 7.2 (igalia.com)

134 points by mariuz 5 hours ago

mort96 3 hours ago

Does anyone understand how HDMI 2.1 support is now no problem? I remember that 2.1 support in AMD's open source driver was blocked by the HDMI forum, but I haven't heard any news about them unblocking it. What changed?

lashkari 2 hours ago

It doesn't give any specifics about what changed on the HDMI Forum side, but this article [0] from June indicates that Valve worked closely with AMD to get it pushed through prior to the release of the Steam Machine (which supports HDMI 2.1 VRR).

[0] https://www.digitalfoundry.net/news/2026/06/valves-hdmi-2-1-...

seanw444 2 hours ago

As far as I can recall: some internal implementation documentation leaked which made the legal position tougher for them somehow to protect it as proprietary (it made sense when I heard it explained, but now I feel like I'm missing an important detail to that), and then Valve had some talks with the HDMI Forum to convince them to let it go, presumably so they could have such support integrated into Linux for their hardware (Deck, Machine, Frame, etc).

So now the HDMI Forum just doesn't really care anymore I guess.

gary_0 2 hours ago

IIRC, a non-AMD contributor was working on adding HDMI 2.1 support to Linux's AMD driver, and then AMD managed to get the HDMI Forum to see that their position was moot and was making things very awkward for AMD.

mort96 2 hours ago

dayofthedaleks 2 hours ago

White collar crime is legal now so IP violation is a pretend concept.

Update - Happily eating the downvotes on this one.

MobiusHorizons 20 minutes ago

what even is the alleged crime? If there was any protected IP they would be able to use the courts to sue. But that isn't happening, which suggests they know they don't have grounds. Am I missing something? Patents seem to be very much still grounds for lawsuits (even relatively baseless patents)

SEJeff 18 minutes ago

Happily upvoting you for agreeing on principal with me. I shall likely join the flogging as a result.

I’m sure it will hurt my 11k internet point account.

calgoo 2 hours ago

Only if an AI does it, so make sure the vibe code the driver

sbinnee 20 minutes ago

I clicked this one with no hype. I am now exited to update the kernel of my raspberry pi 4.

yipinwong 3 hours ago

Who is the main audience for this type of content? Genuinely curious because I am not a serious Linux user.

What type of info do you get out of this for those who read this? So i can glance your insight?

smashed 3 minutes ago

I'd say mostly sys admins type users that want to stay on top of things?

I install Linux on a wide variety of hardware for both work and personal reasons.

I don't read the detailed changelogs religiously but after years of paying some attention to them I can understand most of it and see where the industry is investing developer efforts, what cool new hardware is gaining support and what new security or performance features people are focusing on.

farlight an hour ago

As a long time desktop and server user, why do I look at changelogs...

New filesystems and major changes to existing ones (large performance improvements, new features like adding better compression standards which I now know I can use, fixes to long-standing bugs which open new use cases).

New protocols like wireguard when it was new and exciting (still is now that I think of it). When that was mainlined, I knew I had some network rearchitecting to do.

New device drivers like amdgpu when it was massive news. Less so these days since most hardware is well supported, and I don't buy the absolute latest.

New kernel APIs which I can use in my programs — like landlock, when it was merged I knew it was time to improve sandboxing in some of my stuff.

Though LWN and kernel newbies do it best, already linked by others.

sph 3 hours ago

It's a well-formatted changelog of the most salient features of the release. Linus doesn't provide one apart from a list of added commits and merged branches, which isn't very useful unless you are a kernel developer.

NewJazz 3 hours ago

This isn't quite right.

This is a well-formatted changelog of the changes that Igalia has contributed to the release, AFAICT.

KernelNewbies publishes a much more general summary of changes (it is much longer than this one).

https://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges

https://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxVersions

cassepipe 29 minutes ago

realityking 2 hours ago

It only covers changes made by Igalia devs. For a more general changelog I’d recommend the LWN articles:

https://lwn.net/Articles/1078068/ https://lwn.net/Articles/1078539/

yipinwong 2 hours ago

ty for the context. I was not aware of the Linux dev ecosystem.

tuna74 3 hours ago

I think it is mostly "marketing" for Igalia's services. If you want to pay people to do "stuff" in Linux and adjacent projects like Mesa, Igalia seems very competent.

igleria 3 hours ago

hi audience, we know about this stuff you use on a daily basis, you may be interested in our executive summary of the latest release of the stuff

gchamonlive 3 hours ago

I don't think there is much too it, it's a consulting firm. Would you hire a consulting firm with an empty tech blog portifolio? It's ticking a box, it's stating it's a consulting firm in tech, that it's target audience are companies with Linux machines etc...

yipinwong 2 hours ago

ty. so very narrow audicence it seems.

Per @sph, as Linus provide no changelog, seems like the firm is putting it together for others

Retr0id 3 hours ago

I for one am excited about HDMI 2.1 support on AMD.

seanw444 2 hours ago

It's more than that: free and open support for HDMI 2.1 in general. Previously it was only proprietary implementations that didn't leak the spec which were allowed. AMD is just the only one that has really good open source drivers which can benefit from it, and didn't work around the problem by converting HDMI to DisplayPort in a proprietary on-board GPU chip.

yipinwong 2 hours ago

OK, now this is what I wanted to know as well. I was not aware that changelogs show all this inf.

ty for sharing

OtomotO 2 hours ago

Okay, so ELI 5 why I would now use HDMI instead of DP?

All my monitors support DP, my GPU has more ports for DP ...

I am genuinely interested as I've never even considered using HDMI for my Desktop.

drdexebtjl 2 hours ago

If you’re using a TV. They rarely have DP ports.

ulfbert_inc an hour ago

HDMI is a king on consumer TVs. Linux (in form of SteamOS) is becoming a major console gaming platform thanks to Valve.

ThatPlayer 2 hours ago

HDMI 2.1 carries more bandwidth than DisplayPort 1.4. Plenty of GPU/monitors have that port arrangement, as recent as Nvidia's RTX 40 Series.

preisschild 2 hours ago

Yeah but this is for amdgpu and they had DP2.1 support for a while now.

ThatPlayer 2 hours ago

farlight 32 minutes ago

Because your motherboard only supports HDMI. The last three I used had HDMI, and sometimes VGA.

whalesalad 2 hours ago

I have been using HDMI to game on TV for most or all of my adult life. Mostly console gaming. A few years back I built a dedicated gaming rig, but I still use it with a controller from my couch connected to a TV.

So this is a win for couch gamers and open source in general.

hndbwksam7 3 hours ago

Great context, thanks for adding it

pelcg an hour ago

Sounds like an AI comment.

bigwheels an hour ago

Why is DRM being implemented in the Kernel; What is the profile for an end-user who wants this in their FOSS?

telotortium an hour ago

Here it doesn’t mean “digital rights management”, but “Direct Rendering Manager”, a component of the kernel’s graphics stack: https://docs.kernel.org/gpu/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

voxic11 an hour ago

People who want to play video games, or watch videos using hardware decoding, or train machine learning models? DRM here means https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_Rendering_Manager

> DRM exposes an API that user-space programs can use to send commands and data to the GPU and perform operations such as configuring the mode setting of the display.

> User-space programs can use the DRM API to command the GPU to do hardware-accelerated 3D rendering and video decoding, as well as GPGPU computing.

Lorkki an hour ago

This is DRM as in Direct Rendering Manager, which is the kernel interface to GPU hardware; not Digital Rights Management.

cogman10 an hour ago

Named long before Digital Rights Management was a thing (or at least the 3 letter acronym existed for it).

Shish2k an hour ago

The Direct Rendering Manager is useful for any Linux user who wants to display things on a monitor (unless you're happy with like 640x480 VESA, in which case maybe you don't need it)

lultimouomo an hour ago

Different DRM, the one in the kernel is Direct Rendering Manager, which is basically managing access to the GPU.

sapphyrus an hour ago

DRM refers to Direct Rendering Manager in this context.

dralley an hour ago

DRM = Direct Rendering Manager. GPU scheduling.

proxycon an hour ago

its the Direct Rendering Manager, not the other DRM