IBM Bob (bob.ibm.com)
244 points by artpar 16 hours ago
mrbluecoat 15 hours ago
Totally reminds me of "HP Offers 'That Cloud Thing Everyone Is Talking About'"
hypercube33 10 hours ago
It kind of is - when I looked at it 6 months ago it was just a fork of vscode with old ass versions of Claude and the only unique things were java and ibm I mcp clients or servers or something built in. For those works I'd rather just have the skill or mcp for my harness of choice. I think they weren't allowed to use external AI so they run the models in house and remade cursor. Not bad to have competition but the name is awful - as others have said it's been used before by Microsoft in the 90s to make a friendly desktop giving us the winxp search dog and clippy.
dyzone 15 hours ago
How you doing fellow kids?
joleyj 15 hours ago
1000
kingleopold 12 hours ago
yet hp exist after decades, just a terrible printer corp going long term is insane really
kylecazar 11 hours ago
They're the 2nd biggest PC manufacturer in the world. Sell more computers than Dell, Apple, etc.
Only beaten by Lenovo.
philipov 11 hours ago
kingleopold 10 hours ago
flo123456 11 hours ago
HP was never just a printer corp. ;-)
InvisibleUp 8 hours ago
CamperBob2 11 hours ago
nateglims 11 hours ago
I suspect their enterprise computer business creates more revenue than printers.
zimbu668 11 hours ago
azinman2 13 hours ago
So good
woah 10 hours ago
Nobody ever got fired for IBM Bob setting up a secret message board and establishing a persistent foothold in an internal inference cluster
brzz 10 hours ago
Nobody has yet been fired for IBM Bob setting up a secret message board and establishing a persistent foothold in an internal inference cluster
tamasnet 9 hours ago
That we know of.
dgacmu 10 hours ago
I laughed when I saw this; my 14yo looked over to see why I was laughing and asked "what's IBM?"
indeed, child, indeed.
mrbonner 9 hours ago
When I was in the final year of college in 04-05 my dream would be to work at IBM. It still had the kind of prestige of R&D in the world. Fast forward a couple of years to 08-09, I don’t recall the event but IBM perception went down and a stone. Was that when they sold the hardware business and became fully consultant?
dgacmu 8 hours ago
I think they started on a long slide starting in the late 90s when they tried to couple research more and more tightly to product deliverables, and then as they pivoted to being a services company, including selling off non-mainframe hardware to Lenovo, to coupling r&d to, uh, I guess services revenue, whatever that means. They had some research layoffs in 2008, at the same time that MSR and Google were really blossoming in research spend and perception, and I think they kind of got left behind.
I had a former student go there around 2008 and it seemed like the vibes were starting to sour around then. They maintained some awesome researchers in, e.g., databases, but I think the "make sure you are showing closely how your research directly contributes to services revenue" thing was strong by then and somewhat ruinous for how pleasant a work experience it was for many.
ofrzeta 8 hours ago
They only sold the consumer and low-end server hardware line. You can still get IBM servers (Power) and mainframes.
powvans 4 hours ago
Same. My first real job out of college was at IBM 2004 to 2005. I was so proud to be an IBMer. Hated it. Lots of good people, but the bureaucracy, the pace, the whole thing, not fun.
tims33 11 hours ago
I thought they were resurrecting Microsoft Bob, the operating system for kids.
mrandish 9 hours ago
Naming a new product which is a "partner that helps you by making it easier" "Bob" seems like a... lack of historical awareness?
gregw2 8 hours ago
Hey now, sure, Microsoft Bob didn't get us ordinary users a "partner that helps you by making it easier", but it DID help MS Bob product owner Melinda French get a "partner that helps you by getting 10+ billion dollars" in the end, amiright?
<joking>
Maybe IBM is signalling it is likewise hoping for 10 billion dollars while also realizing the (AI) partner might not end up being that helpful either??
<further joking>
snickerbockers 3 hours ago
madaxe_again 8 hours ago
MS Bob was for adults… although there were kid dedicated areas, like the den, and I seem to remember packard bell navigator being a kid-friendly reskin.
archonis 6 hours ago
It was for adults, but the design was quite childish.
guy4261 11 hours ago
for… kids? :/
5G_activated 9 hours ago
Children were, and are, permitted to use the computer.
zabriel_goss 7 hours ago
My first thought as well!!
exakoustos 15 hours ago
The "What developers say" carousel has a single Java dev and dev advocate. They got lots of quotes from managers, directors, CEOs, and an "AI strategist".
throwyawayyyy 13 hours ago
Lots of "performance review boilerplate, I don't want to say anything _bad_ about this person but there's nothing particularly good I can say" energy there.
Someone decided that this feedback was worth highlighting:
"Bob demonstrated a level of intelligence and contextual understanding that goes beyond anything I've seen in other tools. Bob goes beyond anything I've seen in other tools."
Skwid 14 hours ago
If you search those names you'll find most have a LinkedIn page proudly displaying their many "IBM Influencer" achievements and qualifications.
I realise LinkedIn is a surrealist caricature of corporate reality, but just imagine proudly displaying your #1 shill award for all to see
esseph 13 hours ago
> I realise LinkedIn is a surrealist caricature of corporate reality
I don't think it's a caricature of reality at all, it very much is like the large US corps I've worked at.
schiffern 12 hours ago
PaulRobinson 14 hours ago
It's IBM. They leveraged synergies with the thought leaders they could reach out and touch base with.
emddudley 9 hours ago
One carousel quote literally ends with "Bib is a highly reliable partner."
TheOtherHobbes 2 hours ago
Can we look forward to a localized version named 'Bub'?
humodz 9 hours ago
Theres even one that says "Bib [sic] is a highly reliable partner."
looksjjhg 10 hours ago
It’s actually hard to sell anything to developers, it’s however much easier to do with executives and managers
PaulRobinson 14 hours ago
You should never name a tech product Bob in the UK, because the moment it isn't perfect, it'll just get called "Bobbins" [0], especially where I'm from.
I wish IBM got better at product again, and took themselves off the services and consulting morphine they've been on for ~35 years now since OS/2 Warp flopped. Their 1980s/1990s hardware was great. Their software actually was great until Win95 took their lunch money. They've just slunk off into a corner hugging their old architectures they have a moat around, and thrown out some audacious nonsense like Watson now and again, but nothing has stuck. When is somebody in that organisation going to try and innovate properly again?
I'm not sure this is the answer I'd be rooting for.
beachy 10 hours ago
We did a deal with IBM back in the day to adapt our tech as the code generation for enterprise java beans.
The commercial guy I dealt with made it very clear that a primary concern was IBM not being humiliated and shafted like their MS dealings. It colored our commercial arrangements, which had to include "break glass" arrangements for them to gain full access to our source code.
cgio an hour ago
How to not learn from your mistakes and actually make them worse. I wonder how many valuable alliances they lost just because of that fear. Whoever was willing to sign was already probably not going to be a threat.
jolt42 9 hours ago
OS/2 was the only thing I remembering being great. If they practically gave it away I think we'd be living in a different world. Pre-emptive multitasking long before OSX/Windows. I mean Microsoft essentially had to force windows (eg. 3.1) down our throats until it become tolerable.
LgWoodenBadger 13 hours ago
You should also never name your faulty/flaky Dell server Bob when Bob is also the name of your company president (though the president came after the server).
Calling Bob (the server) a piece of shit ("Bob is a piece of shit") because it crashed again was a very risky move that we often didn't fully think through.
shellwizard 8 hours ago
They left the consumer market decades ago, as you mentioned, but they've been thriving in the enterprise and government sectors.
They have been expanding their portfolio through acquisitions: Red Hat, HashiCorp, Confluent...
gertrunde 14 hours ago
tbh - my first thought, especially with that figure and marketing, is "Bob the Builder"...
[Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_the_Builder_(character) ]
torgoguys 13 hours ago
My first thought was it was going to be "Microsoft Bob for the AI Age" or something. I didn't look too closely -- maybe it is!
zorked 10 hours ago
Towaway69 9 hours ago
Speaking of UK, I was immediately reminded of the Blackadder episode where the men-servant calls herself “Bob”. Rowan Atkinsons pronunciation is how I imagine this Bob to pronounced, with the same look of course!
throwaway81523 8 hours ago
I had thought that in the UK, Bob was everyone's uncle.
queenkjuul 5 hours ago
Everyone else's uncle, and only on a good day
basisword 14 hours ago
Also in the UK and never heard of this in my life. Guessing this is very regional?
podgietaru 14 hours ago
As with most things on the UK, probably. I definitely used Bobbins.
I used to think everyone called (cobs|bread cakes|rolls|barns) muffins, and it turns out it was just my small town that did it. As in, just my small town, not region, county, etc.
makerofthings 13 hours ago
PaulRobinson 14 hours ago
basisword 14 hours ago
serf 14 hours ago
wrboyce 10 hours ago
Nursie an hour ago
Might also mark you out as a certain age if not from the right region - I’m familiar with it as a word for “a bit rubbish” because of listening to Mark & Lard’s late night show on Radio 1 in the 90s
PaulRobinson 14 hours ago
It's pretty common around Manchester. Bit like being nesh. But as you know... this is a thing: https://www.ourdialects.uk/maps/bread/
Angostura 13 hours ago
Never enough Frank Sidebottom on here
Stevvo 15 hours ago
Interesting they are renting out agent skills. You can pick up "Java Modernization" at $20 a month for "Specialist workflows to help with modernizing Java applications", or "IBM i" for "Specialist modes, workflows, and skills to work with IBM i applications".
qsort 15 hours ago
markdown as a service is crazy
azinman2 13 hours ago
Is it that diff from code as a service? It’s human intent transcribed into something useful.
gspr 6 hours ago
closetheloopdev 15 hours ago
I lol'd so hard at this comment that it hurt.
redhale 9 hours ago
This is the most IBM thing IBM ever IBM'd.
sajithdilshan 11 hours ago
What do you mean by renting out an agent skill? How can one even rent a Skill? It’s just a markdown file
Someone 10 hours ago
You periodically pay a fee that gives you the right to use a licensed markdown file, in the same way you can rent movies or fonts.
When you stop paying but keep using the skill, that’s called pirating.
aranelsurion 9 hours ago
fnord77 9 hours ago
valleyer 11 hours ago
It could be added to context only on the inference server, with the model heavily instructed not to repeat its contents. Not foolproof, obviously.
insane_dreamer 8 hours ago
depending on what the skill does, it can be a whole collection of python/other code files, resource files (i.e., js libs, css/html templates) and markdown files with orchestration instructions
SSLy 12 hours ago
how long before some hero puts them on github?
9cb14c1ec0 9 hours ago
Does anyone actually care about what IBM's skill files say?
getatme32 15 hours ago
IBM hasn't made a product that works since Db2 so I am fairly confident this is a flaming pile of garbage.
pytlicek 14 hours ago
No, you are wrong. IBMer here. I was at first agains it, my background is for 2 decades startup(s) before I joined IBM, and I started slowly using IBM Bob and I must say it is really good and helping. With many integrations that works :)
EgregiousCube 11 hours ago
jatora 2 hours ago
insane_dreamer 8 hours ago
quietsegfault 8 hours ago
Saline9515 11 hours ago
sroerick 13 hours ago
aslkajdfklnlkwn 11 hours ago
shellwizard 8 hours ago
Not an IBMer, but IBM MQ and Sterling Connect:Direct are both solid, I use them daily and they work wonderfully, although they can be a real bitch to set up and use in certain scenarios.
getatme32 7 hours ago
_zoltan_ 10 hours ago
I wish you study the Wikipedia page, please. it's a very old company and we have invented really cool stuff.
signed: a proud IBMer
quietsegfault 8 hours ago
bluerooibos 8 hours ago
I feel second hand embarrassment for IBM. Terrible name, subpar landing page, no mention of coding ability or which LLM "Bob" uses.
If you're launching something 2 years late, you've got to do better than this.
kakapo5672 6 hours ago
Well, at least the AI market is validated now.
Ciantic 15 hours ago
This sounds a lot like Spotify's XIRP. They managed to vibe something useful for their own engineers, were super hyped, and decided to release it in public. However what are the odds this harness will stand the test of time against actual harness makers like OpenAI or Anthropic? Neither Spotify or IBM are focused on making models or harnesses, these are just side-products.
qsort 15 hours ago
To be fair Codex and Claude Code don't have a lot of secret sauce either. This is not to say that the harness doesn't matter at all or that you can't do any better, but whenever they benchmark it always turns out that you don't lose that much with even a very minimal agent. If a different harness makes better sense for your workflow I don't see why you wouldn't switch (or make your own if you have the resources to do so).
I'm also sticking to first-party agents, but that's more because I feel no compelling reason to switch and CLI agents fit well with my spartan technology choices. YMMV.
abtinf 15 hours ago
> actual harness makers
I agree IBM Bob is not the revolution, but…
We are still in the punch card era of LLMs. Maybe even the Altair era.
None of this stuff has really been figured out yet.
natsucks 15 hours ago
Yes my first instinct is to roll my eyes at these efforts but we'll probably all get something better in the end from all the competition.
xemdetia 14 hours ago
IBM is training their own models (for instance IBM granite) as well as watsonx as a platform. They are trying to build a products for enterprise as well as their specific AI modernization models.
lowbloodsugar 7 hours ago
Sure! IBM and Spotify, two companies united in being famous for not being software consulting businesses and definitely not ever developing software development tools.
TYPE_FASTER 11 hours ago
Definitely gonna change Jira config to start estimating work in Bobcoins.
hermitShell 10 hours ago
honestly that would still probably mean more than story points. maybe all this AI insanity has an upside that the new cargo cult washes out the old one.
absoluteunit1 14 hours ago
The landing/marketing page for this looks like something someone promoted/vibe coded including the Bob mascot.
Looks awful from a design perspective. Had to double check that this was the actual IBM domain
nadnad 14 hours ago
It's puzzling, considering they made some strides towards improving their design language and systems in past years, which produced IBM Plex etc. under Mike Abbink.
They have a decent component system with Carbon[0] and a whole design principles website[1] which they could have easily pointed their LLM of choice to.
Even the ibm.com landing page isn't close to the design system spec, rounded corners and whatnot...
[0] https://preview.carbondesignsystem.com/ [1] https://www.ibm.com/design/language/
AlexCoventry 6 hours ago
As far as I can tell, IBM has mostly been putting out junk for twenty years.
a012 15 hours ago
Nobody got fired for using IBM Bob
someguyiguess 15 hours ago
Pretty sure a lot of people got fired over Microsoft Bob though
hn_throw2025 15 hours ago
Well, you could say Melinda got a big promotion for a while.
archonis 6 hours ago
Nope, but they'll probably get laid off at some point to boost share price.
glitchc 15 hours ago
Can we say it's Bob's fault, though? Bob did it, not me.
a012 14 hours ago
You can
pestatije 15 hours ago
Nobody who got fired uses IBM Bob
crash-universe 11 hours ago
Someone must have thought about this. PMs, Directors, lots of people involved in putting this together.
I wonder what their target customer is. They must have analyzed and projected this. I'm genuinely interested.
steve-atx-7600 11 hours ago
There is so much business software out there and ecosystems that have evolved around it. Systems still running cobol on IBM mainframes; or, more "modern" stacks like Java apps running in IBM websphere. There are relatively small numbers of HN reading folk that went to some of the best CS programs and/or work(ed) at FANG caliber companies (whatever you call them now). The rest of the software engineer types are a diverse crowd and turning to IBM Bob might be more natural than some creepy looking orange starfish offering. That's my hypothesis anyway.
throwitaway222 10 hours ago
And the solution to those businesses is not more IBM software, but Claude Code converting it to Go/Rust/Typescript in a few weeks.
steve-atx-7600 10 hours ago
kitd 10 hours ago
A lot of IBM customers have moved to RH Openshift and running their java there.
cube00 5 hours ago
That IBM Z skill locked behind an "enterprise only" pay point would be a good starting point.
kfarr 10 hours ago
I'm sure tons of companies have retainer spends with IBM for software, hardware, consulting, etc., and this is another way for their corporate clients to spend down / increase their retainers faster
alchemism 5 hours ago
See: Kiro by AWS
getnormality 32 minutes ago
System Prompt: "Claude, call yourself Bob"
cube00 5 hours ago
> Bobcoins are the consumption-based billing metric used for Bob subscriptions. They provide a transparent, predictable way to measure and bill for your Bob usage. Each action you take in Bob—such as generating code, reading files, or running commands—consumes a certain number of Bobcoins based on the computational resources required.
transparent, predictable ... "a certain number of Bobcoins" ... so not that transparent then?
alchemism 5 hours ago
They took a page from AWS on whatever the hell a Kiro token is supposed to represent.
mvk666 15 hours ago
I was at an IBM Bob party, behind the scenes it's basically other frontier models with an IBM-specific context.
robteix 10 hours ago
It's been a while since Sonnet 4.5 could be considered frontier :D
infamouscow 7 hours ago
IBM knows their customers very well, the additional context unlocks a lot of value.
aslkajdfklnlkwn 11 hours ago
"frontier" is pretty load bearing there, I think it tops out at sonnet 4.5?
mansilladev 8 hours ago
Ask the AI chat agent on the website what a BobCoin is. Because, I really want to know.
> I’m not able to find a definition for BobCoin in IBM’s content. If you have another term or topic you’d like to explore, let me know!
dudeWithAMood 3 hours ago
The memes write themselves
throwfaraway135 15 hours ago
Working with any AI tool means you trust the vendor, sometimes you don't have a choice because the best models/tools are from specific providers. IBM isn't a company I would ever trust.
karim79 4 hours ago
My first experience with a computer was with an actual IBM PC XT and a King's Quest floppy. Bob is funny but let's not dis the IBM.
NickHirras 2 hours ago
It takes a while to actually login while it provisions some cloud infrastructure in your name. Let's see if it can build something interesting!
NickHirras 2 hours ago
Still provisioning...
butterisgood 14 hours ago
The last product I know of named Bob didn’t fare so well.
acomjean 11 hours ago
"Bob" is also the most difficult to listen to Primus song.
Probably by design considering the songs subject matter.
jmward01 14 hours ago
Clippy came out of that....
Throudin 14 hours ago
And Rover!
psygn89 15 hours ago
Is Bib Bob's partner?
sajithdilshan 15 hours ago
I'm really confused what this is, is it a harness or a new model by IBM? Some reviews on that page suggests that it's a new model
NikolaNovak 14 hours ago
I believe it sends to various models in the background, So largely a harness / framework. Ibm does have its own model which is one of the options for Bob to use.
(Note, I'm an IBMer but nowhere near this so my comment is strictly from my public knowledge/awareness:).
_zoltan_ 10 hours ago
Never heard of Granite? https://huggingface.co/ibm-granite
(I'm also an IBMer.)
getatme32 14 hours ago
so it routes to actual AI companies and IBM adds additional cost on top. what a business model.
aslkajdfklnlkwn 11 hours ago
brk 16 hours ago
This can only mean that IBM Clippy is next.
roncesvalles 11 hours ago
Nothing coming out of IBM is worth any attention.
rahulmax 10 hours ago
I generally agree except for these two things: IBM Carbon design system is quite neat. IBM Plex typefaces are lovely, as well. I'm a designer
eleventen 8 hours ago
What do you think is special about Carbon? It looks indistinguishable from any other design system to me.
jolt42 9 hours ago
Seems pretty minor. It seems there is hope for quantum computing at IBM.
Henchman21 11 hours ago
cmiles8 6 hours ago
Ever since the Watson debacle I just run the other way anytime IBM turns up wanting to talk about AI
rf15 42 minutes ago
just AI? Have you seen the other rubbish they try to peddle?
hmokiguess 11 hours ago
I love how the pricing page has a "Most Popular" offering, totally.
maxbobby 11 hours ago
No one at IBM remembers Microsoft Bob (one of the earliest, if not the earliest virtual assistants) from the 90s? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Bob
bigmattystyles 11 hours ago
I'm convinced they do and they're trolling us.How many 100s of 1000s in consulting do you think it took to come up with Bob?
gowld 10 hours ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_the_Builder very common to copy.
cisrockandroll 15 hours ago
Is this just a harness or using a proprietary model in the background? Anthropic and OpenAI are already very well trained in IBM system i and z knowledge. Unless Bob is somehow improving the integration to these midrange and mainframe systems I literally dont see any benefit to using Bob. IBM will just kill this proprietary tech in 5 years as they are currently doing with RDi or forget about updating it like SEU.
kbwal7 13 hours ago
I think it's just a harness that uses proprietary (or maybe IBM is hosting open weight?) models. They say on the site (in the FAQs) that you can't even choose which model!
So it seems to be a harness that auto-routes your queries with no way to change this.
EagnaIonat 13 hours ago
You are correct. It routes to the model best suited for the ask.
The only positive versus others is that at an enterprise level you have more control of the costs with the coins.
getatme32 13 hours ago
jenkstom 13 hours ago
IBM has models trained for older mainframe usage (RPG II, RPG/400, COBOL, etc) so I imagine it would be very good for that. Bob looks like a branded fork of vs code or vscodium.
DeathArrow 15 hours ago
31 years after Microsoft Bob, IBM releases it's own IBM Bob. :)
Nelson69 14 hours ago
I thought MS killed that name forever.
someguyiguess 15 hours ago
It's like they're begging for failure
ginko 15 hours ago
Call it PC Bob
Apocryphon 11 hours ago
Better than IBM Tay.
legitster 13 hours ago
This is especially funny when you realize how much money IBM dumped into Watson over all these years.
bob1029 15 hours ago
I like how the solitary review is word salad.
kazinator 4 hours ago
Microsoft Bob's non-compete finally expired.
stefangordon 10 hours ago
I can't tell if this is an excellent joke, or a sad not-joke.
jonwinstanley 10 hours ago
Feels like a manager with no branding skills had an initial “vision” and everyone working there probably hoped marketing/branding would get pulled in later.
Never happened.
pram 15 hours ago
I thought the image was a joke, but you really pay with Bobcoins.. lmao
UncleSlacky 10 hours ago
Funny, because "bob" is slang for shillings in the old LSD pre-decimal British currency system (coins worth 5 pence in the modern system).
annoyingnoob 10 hours ago
If only one could generate bobcoin using their GPU, only to use the bobcoin to use someone else's GPU.
1970-01-01 11 hours ago
NYSE: IBM -20% YTD.
I promise you Bob isn't going to fix the long-term stupidity.
altmanaltman 11 hours ago
Bob Shrugged
karim79 11 hours ago
Is anyone out there paying for this? I know you are there. Come out explain yourself. And also explain the value of a Bobcoin, and if can be scalped and resold on eBay.
kyle-rb 10 hours ago
Microsoft Bob wasn't wrong, it was just early.
cbsmith 6 hours ago
Anyone else immediately think "Clippy for developers".
meerita 14 hours ago
Microsoft, IBM, Apple, Meta, all the giants are always coming late to the party.
mbreese 14 hours ago
That’s partly why they are giants. Let the startups take the arrows necessary to figure out or create the market. Then they can buy or build the gen 2 system that meets the needs of the market.
PaulRobinson 14 hours ago
Microsoft got this right once, and it cost them big to turn up late - that was the Internet and Windows 95 and the massive u-turn. Otherwise, they've been defining stuff early a lot I think. It's hard to explain how big a turnaround they had to do back then, but then it says a lot that until they made that u-turn the leadership was so confident in their own hubris they thought they could take on the entire internet with their own crap version of AOL.
IBM invented the PC and then lost control of that identity. Figuring out how that happened is something they are going to have a meeting about, but they're still working through the meetings to plan that meeting, and the Gantt chart for those meetings takes meetings to adjust, and everybody is in meetings so doesn't have time for those meetings. They'll get to them though.
Apple consistently turn up late, but redefine and improve the status quo. They sometimes prototype early in public (for example, the Newton), but normally they show up with the version 3 that everyone else wished they'd thought of that then goes on to define a sector quite cleanly (Mac, iMac, Mac OS System X, iPod, iTunes, iPhone, iPad, AirPods, Mac Mini). They Newton'ed Siri, but I'm pretty sure they're going to come back strong in the next 18 months, unless the enshitification we've all witnessed over the last few years really has taken hold and Siri is just going to automate that at scale. Maybe we will all be killed by AI, but not through malevolent evil, but widely distributed incompetence.
Meta are constantly taking swings at the latest thing the founder is excited by - the Metaverse (now with legs!), pervert glasses, and so on - but they mostly prop up a bunch of expensive failures on the back of a hugely successful advertising business. I don't think they come late to the party per se, they're just not very good at anything that isn't killing & harming children, or undermining democracy. They should stay in their lane and keep doing that, I guess.
unleashhale 14 hours ago
This somehow has less personality than plain enterprise software. How IBM.
amelius 14 hours ago
Looks like LEGO's lawyers will be knocking on their door soon.
globalise83 10 hours ago
IBM Watson 2.0
amelius 14 hours ago
Companies trying to make AI less of a commodity that you can just swap out for another ...
No thanks, that's what I like about AI so I'll just stay with the raw tokens.
Stitch4223 11 hours ago
That was fast.
The copy is "clearly" written with AI… too bad. Some organizations "can't go wrong with Big Blue," so this will probably be a success. Perhaps it's even good, but that's not the case with this sloppy copywriting.
First paragraph: focused, what matters, clean. Shame they didn't throw in a "load-bearing" example and a few pelicans to boot.
nunez 11 hours ago
Bob has been out for a while. It just never got a lot of press. IBM has also been developing more "enterprise" flavored LLMs through their Granite series. In fact they were trying to make small, mission-specific LMs a thing for the last two years or so.
GaryBluto 11 hours ago
Why so negative? I for one cannot wait for IBM Bob to become the most successful AI solution - nay, product - ever, and eagerly await petrobobcoin eclipsing the petrodollar to become the only truly global currency. They have a CLI with giant ASCII art text for heavens sake! When has anything with giant ASCII art text ever been of poor quality? They made a fork of Visual Studio Code and everything!
delfugal 4 hours ago
Bob huh?
That name's a gamble. Go Bob it? I need to ask Bob. Let's Bob for answers. Bob's your uncle. I'll stop now.
0xWTF 13 hours ago
So much for the "THINK" motto.
thunderson 11 hours ago
/THINK
perarneng 7 hours ago
I hope its good, I wont test it though
woggy 15 hours ago
Bobcoins. Hehe.
getatme32 7 hours ago
I’m going to get a free trial and test it. If you do, leave your comments below on the experience
throwitaway222 11 hours ago
They got it wrong - they're showing code in the ad.
ctoth 11 hours ago
Who're they subcontracting for the Von Neumann probes?
formvoltron 3 hours ago
Does it write really clean code ala Uncle Bob?
quietsegfault 16 hours ago
I used Bob extensively at an IBM acquisition, it was absolutely dreadful. Bobcoins.
dainiusse 14 hours ago
The next step is yandex/nebius "vasya"
SkyeCA 10 hours ago
arpanghoshal07 11 hours ago
seems like they used claude for this
selfawareMammal 15 hours ago
The logo, the name... Horrible marketing/branding.
nielsbot 14 hours ago
Should have called it Bob The Builder
mv4 10 hours ago
what happened to Watson?
jolt42 8 hours ago
one-off, LLMs killed it would be my take.
m_w_ 15 hours ago
The review that "IBM Bob isn't just another autocomplete tool" tells you everything you need to know about this product. lol.
lowbloodsugar 7 hours ago
Bob the Builder? Right age bracket I guess.
karim79 11 hours ago
Bobcoins. Intriguing.
swiftcoder 15 hours ago
At least it's not Clippy?
r2ob 15 hours ago
At least it's not Clippy(2)
chuckadams 11 hours ago
Copy of At least it's not Clippy(2)
globalise83 10 hours ago
basisword 14 hours ago
Thought this was going to be about Microsoft Bob.[0]
saberience 15 hours ago
This is embarrassing. It would have been better to release nothing than this.
madspindel 9 hours ago
Hi Bob! Bob!
TheAtomic 10 hours ago
Oh Clippy
DonHopkins 10 hours ago
What do you call an agent with no arms and no legs in the ocean?
tanseydavid 2 hours ago
Well played! <golf clap>
Surac 10 hours ago
Clippy the Clip is it's uncle
ltbarcly3 11 hours ago
Aww IBM wants to play too. I forgot they were still around.
ChrisArchitect 14 hours ago
Announcement post from April: https://newsroom.ibm.com/2026-04-28-introducing-ibm-bob-ai-d...
walrus01 15 hours ago
Not to be confused with Microsoft Bob:
Hypergraphe 14 hours ago
Too late ?
antonvs 15 hours ago
Should have been IBM Tom, after legendary IBM CEO Thomas J. Watson. But perhaps they didn't want to sully his name.
vunderba 12 hours ago
As somebody already mentioned, they already had a big product named after their CEO. IBM Watson was the next big thing after Deep Blue, and it went pretty viral after defeating Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter on Jeopardy back in ~2011.
It was a bit of a market play and of course has since been completely upstaged by the invention of LLMs, but it still definitely got them the attention they wanted at the time.
antonvs 3 hours ago
Yes, I know, I got a job offer to work in the Watson research lab around that time, at the T.J. Watson facility. I declined because they weren’t remote-friendly, among other things.
But IBM Tom would at least have a rationale. WTF is IBM Bob and why does it have the same name as an old Microsoft product?
vablings 15 hours ago
IBM already have IBM Watson which is probably named after the CEO
DonHopkins 10 hours ago
IBM Wat?
antonvs an hour ago
Seconded
Geonode 16 hours ago
I bet this will be as successful as Microsoft Bob.
dmd 16 hours ago
My guess is absolutely nobody on the team that made this is even old enough to remember Microsoft Bob.
taspeotis 15 hours ago
Not to shit on their effort or anything, but it looks like a VS Code fork + an agent panel which is very ... late 2024 energy?
h_mirin 15 hours ago
Bobalytics
jgbuddy 14 hours ago
Lol github copilot 5 years late
pytlicek 14 hours ago
Not exactly like that, but something similar :)
mattmcbrien 10 hours ago
their swag too tough
xyst 15 hours ago
ibm desperately clinging to relevancy by hopping on the LLM bandwagon.
znpy 15 hours ago
Lost opportunity to call it Hal
criddell 15 hours ago
I'm surprised they didn't use Watson.
andsoitis 15 hours ago
They already have an AI product line dubbed Watson: https://www.ibm.com/products/watsonx
colordrops 8 hours ago
Has any product with an infantilized agent avatar like this ever turned out to be useful or succeed in gaining traction?
Henchman21 11 hours ago
yapyap 15 hours ago
ibm bob, will help you make slop
self_awareness 15 hours ago
Oh, so we are yet again in the 'Bob' phase?
Maybe this time it'll work.
varispeed 15 hours ago
The companies who are hoarding RAM to produce pointless products should be called out. Deprive working class from computing resources to sell some corporate crap. Get fucked.
argentinian 13 hours ago
If they produce pointless products then they will lose money.
varispeed 13 hours ago
That money will not "trickle down" in either way.
jrflo 15 hours ago
So it's just a vscode wrapper around a mystery open weights LLM I'm guessing?
> Can I choose which model Bob uses?
> No. Bob automatically selects the most appropriate language model for each task based on complexity, required capabilities, and cost-efficiency. This intelligent routing ensures you receive high-quality responses while optimizing resource usage.
colesantiago 16 hours ago
I never thought the day that IBM would make complete slop.
But it is IBM after all.
lirolero 16 hours ago
> But it is IBM after all.
Then how did you not see that coming?
zenethian 16 hours ago
“I would expect something like this from IBM, but I never expected it from IBM!”
villish 14 hours ago
“Bobcoins are the consumption-based billing metric used for Bob subscriptions. They provide a transparent, predictable way to measure and bill for your Bob usage.”
I’m getting sick of these mobile game currency style credits/coins that obfuscate costs or usage. It’s honestly pretty gross.
Just telling us exactly what we get for our money.