GrapheneOS' rewritten Messages app is released (github.com)

218 points by microtonal 9 hours ago

I_am_tiberius 7 hours ago

Everytime I read GrapheneOS news I search for news related to Fairephone. It's such a shame that there's still no official plan for Fairephone to work on requirements for GrapheneOS. The combination of those 2 would be fantastic. It would also open a big new market (I assume) for Fairephone so not sure why there seems no clear sign in that direction at all (to my knowledge).

jasonvorhe 7 hours ago

Everytime I see Fairphone mentioned whenever there's news about GrapheneOS I'm confused as to why people keep on conflating both when they obviously have very different goals.

Timshel 6 hours ago

? Not conflating, just we want a phone with both goals ...

pyaamb 4 hours ago

t0bia_s 5 hours ago

Every time Fairphone release new device I check width size. Still waiting for small device.

topaz0 4 hours ago

andrepd 6 hours ago

I think it's obvious that the target audience has a huge overlap...

gpvos 6 hours ago

drnick1 4 hours ago

To be honest the specs of the Fairphone are middling and the device is rather expensive for what you get. The Pixels are a much better value, especially with a series. If you want something truly high end, wait for the Motorola with official GOS support.

varispeed 4 hours ago

Without support of alternative OS Fairphone is basically a landfill. Why would anyone buy this apart from novelty factor.

armadyl 4 hours ago

chaosharmonic 2 hours ago

saligne 7 hours ago

You should search for the many times where GrapheneOS has stated they won't work with Fairphone

Telaneo 6 hours ago

It's because Fairphone doesn't fulfil GOS's hardware requirements. If Fairphone addresses that, there's no reason for GOS to not support a Fairphone device.

fc417fc802 5 hours ago

NewJazz 7 hours ago

Yep. Gos isn't the only mfg in town if you have or want a fairphone.

https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Fairphone_(Gen._6)_(fairp...

armadyl 4 hours ago

gruez 6 hours ago

mrd3v0 7 hours ago

Given the state of Fairphone hardware, software and business, it is not surprising.

tcoff91 7 hours ago

AstralSerenity 2 hours ago

I would throw serious money at them both if this collaboration happened.

sva_ 5 hours ago

Every fairphone I've seen to far the camera was kinda ass. Did it improve? Pixel phones usually have old Samsung sensors which are pretty damn decent.

emaro 5 hours ago

The sensor of the Fairphone camera is good enough, the software processing is what's lacking. Imo, owner of an FP4.

Evidlo 2 hours ago

Some screenshots since the repo doesn't have any for whatever reason:

https://imgur.com/a/C8yV83v

cloudie78 8 hours ago

How about some screenshots?

qweqwe14 8 hours ago

I constantly see those projects that would benefit from a screenshot in a readme, but for some reason the thought about adding one doesn't even come to the authors' mind, even though it's pretty obvious. I'd really like to know what's going on.

sakisv 7 hours ago

I think the reason is that you can get quite much of a tunnel vision while developing. Everyone involved already knows what they're building and how it looks, so it's very easy to overlook it.

Case in point, I recently wrote a CLI to show which of your AWS infra is not captured in terraform, and you can either print the result as a json to consume by a machine or generate a dashboard with some charts. It took me an embarrassing while to realise that I should have included a damned screenshot in the README, in fact I think I only realised when I wanted to show it to my brother.

IshKebab 6 hours ago

gbalduzzi 7 hours ago

I think in many cases the authors value functionality much more then esthetics.

Which is a bummer because it is a complete different point of view from the more typical user experience

embedding-shape 7 hours ago

xboxnolifes 7 hours ago

gremlinunderway 7 hours ago

Dig1t 7 hours ago

"A picture is worth a thousand words"

It's like we've had this ancient knowledge passed down for generations but people constantly just ignore it.

nicolas_ 6 hours ago

I was looking for the same thing. Fine! Maybe it’s in the Readme.md. Nothing! Well, ok then

why_at 3 hours ago

I just updated mine to try it out, it definitely looks nicer.

https://imgur.com/a/ZGpbqB7

karimabuseer 6 hours ago

Worth raising a PR/discussion on the repo as reasonable chance the devs haven’t even considered it

Maskawanian 7 hours ago

Does anyone know if this is something that we can install now, or if it will show up in the next OS release?

flexagoon 7 hours ago

You can go to the GOS App Store, choose the Messaging app, click 3 dots at the top and choose the Alpha release channel to get it now

novafunc 7 hours ago

They mentioned you can use the Alpha from their app installer.

Maskawanian 7 hours ago

Good to know! For others: You open their app store, go into messaging, hamburger menu, select release channel, and choose alpha.

gib444 7 hours ago

It's in the alpha channel. Go in to the 'App Store' app, go to Messaging, 3 dot menu and change release channel.

DeepDyno 2 hours ago

One feature I just found out about after trying it is that you can text email addresses.

Unfortunately I think that feature is shutting down.

https://www.verizon.com/support/vtext-vzwpix-shutdown/

I'm still waiting until RCS is supported before I actually use it.

Denatonium an hour ago

It's probably for the best. As recently as 2016 (and probably more recently; that's just the last time I tested this), they weren't even validating SPF records on their email-to-SMS gateway. You could spoof the "From" address to any email address you fancied and your messages would go through, appearing to be from that sender. Back in high school, my childish self had a field day showing off my phone's SMS inbox filled up with spam Viagra ads that were "sent by" Hillary Clinton's "hacked" email server.

It's not as funny in hindsight, given the unexpected results of that election, but at the time, it felt like top-tier humor.

mrd3v0 7 hours ago

I wish they prioritised the call app. It is beyond appalling. You can't even determine when a call happened, beyond the generic low fidelity "[time] ago". It also almost feels like tapping anything makes me accidentally call people. Abhorrent UI/UX to be completely honest.

loufe 6 hours ago

This is completely false. Tap the call, tap "call details" and its there. Took be 2 second to disprove. This is lazy to the point of being seemingly malicious commentary.

slumberlust an hour ago

I agree with parent. When I tap the icon/picture on the history it should pull up the contact not call. I also find the need to click into a submenu for context bad UI.

Your comment is unnecessarily inflammatory.

j1elo 5 hours ago

I'm just reading from the barrier here, and not knowing what it even looks like, but reading your description I can immediately agree that it is a bad design.

There's only a handful of critical details in a call history, and absolutely no reason for any UI to implement them as secondary or tertiary details: Whether it was in- or outbound. To/from what contact. The date and time.

2 taps for some other extra info such as call length, or further contact details, would be OK I guess, but for first-level info as these, it's 100% bad design.

I mean come on, design-wise this was already a "Done" thing in the golden Nokia days! https://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/03/02/a-week-with-the-nokia-n...

[*] Ctrl+F to find the image below "miss a call".

Walf 4 hours ago

fc417fc802 5 hours ago

okanat 6 hours ago

I'm using LineageOS so I have the AOSP Phone app. If Graphene uses the same, then you can actually determine the exact time of call, but you need to jump through a couple of hoops: Go to "Call History" from the three dots then click on the call of interest. You'll see a button called "Call Details". Then you can see the exact time.

azdle 6 hours ago

Can confirm the same works on Graphene. Also works directly from the "Recents" list.

HybridStatAnim8 2 hours ago

Good news! GrapheneOS has ported Messaging to kotlin, jetpack compose, and material you. The same is planned for the Contacts app, Dialer app, and more. Dont quote me but it seems Contacts and Dialer are up next after Messaging.

Also, GrapheneOS has very recently released automatic call recording for the Dialer.

subscribed 6 hours ago

What? :)

You mean the perfectly functional (if barebones) AOSP call app? :)

HybridStatAnim8 2 hours ago

It will get ported to kotlin, material 3, and jetpack compose, just like Messaging.

gpvos 6 hours ago

The one with the terrible UI, yes.

mewse-hn 8 hours ago

Does it do RCS?

OneDeuxTriSeiGo 8 hours ago

No. RCS is still quite hard to actually implement. There's an open issue for it but the effort is mildly herculean.

AFAIUI though GOS does intend on providing an RCS impl eventually even if it takes years to do.

sicktriple 7 hours ago

I'm really hoping they're doing this to pave the way for an RCS implementation. If it can be done, GOS is in the best position to make it happen, and without RCS, chatting with normies is both extremely inconvenient (large group chats straight up do not work) and categorically insecure. If I could convince all my friends and family to use Signal I would, but they just think I'm on about some weird Edward Snowden shit, and they just write me off as crazy. "Why would I checks notes download software to solve a problem when I could use the one that came with my phone?"

loufe 6 hours ago

greatgib 5 hours ago

Groxx 7 hours ago

particularly if you want to support all of the message-body features, of which there are MANY. it's very business-comms oriented.

I broadly expect third-party RCS apps to drop that though, like how essentially none support all of MMS. did you know MMS supports slideshows (I built support for this once)? 3d objects (mimetype model/gltf+json)? "timed text" (mimetype text/mp4)?

sterlind 7 hours ago

What's so difficult about implementing RCS from a technical perspective?

0l 7 hours ago

seany an hour ago

RCS is really the only thing I truly am annoyed by with rooted devices. If GrapheneOS can build something open that works we should be able to rip it apart and get it to work without passing play integrity.

tcfhgj 6 hours ago

also I think RCS is way to insecure for Graphene OS - they have no way of making sure the communication is actually 100% secure.

In my experience, Graphene OS doesn't make compromises.

fph 5 hours ago

HybridStatAnim8 2 hours ago

Not yet, but they do plan to add support for it.

jcul 5 hours ago

Where I live, an sms app is not very important. It's almost exclusively used for two factor authentication messages. Everyone uses WhatsApp, signal, telegram etc, even businesses and services.

So having a bare bones aosp messaging app was never an issue for me. Having said that, I find fossify messages pretty good.

Will try out the new GOS app too.

nosioptar 2 hours ago

All of fossify's apps I've tried have been better than the stock apps.

module1973 7 hours ago

Would have been cool to have encrypted SMS messages like the SMSecure app while we wait for RCS

LoganDark 8 hours ago

That was really fast, they only announced it like a day or two ago IIRC? Also: no screenshots of the redesigned interface?!

getpokedagain 8 hours ago

If you look at the history they have been working on this for a few months. The announcement probably was tied to this public release being cut for testing.

lollobomb 7 hours ago

Now, can we please get the long-awaited full system backup feature? We pay you for a reason!

(sarcasm obvious, but indeed full system backup is sorely missing. Seedvault is crap, not an option)

mmooss 8 hours ago

With a seemingly insurmountable workload - maintain an actually secure OS fork - for a small team, I wonder how GrapheneOS prioritizes things like messaging apps? I'm not saying it's wrong at all; I am just interested in the thinking inside a project like that.

I can imagine many reasons to devote resources to it:

* A platform is only as good as its apps. If they want to grow GOS in the general public, it requires a good SMS/MMS messaging app.

* LLM tools greatly reduce development costs, especially for well-known functions like text messaging.

* Without secure messaging (as far as SMS/MMS can be secure), the platform security is greatly reduced.

* GOS got a big donation, or has a volunteer that wants to do messaging ...

But idk what I'm talking about. What is their approach?

ravenstine 7 hours ago

Well they're going to be shipping GOS on Motorola and I think some other devices, so basic things like the messaging app need to actually have some polish to them. I really like GrapheneOS overall as-is, but the messaging app felt like baby's first texting app. Not necessarily their fault since it's pretty much straight out of AOSP if I understand correctly. But any time I've installed GrapheneOS, the messaging app is one of two things I must replace every time (the other being the downright bad AOSP keyboard).

If they fix(ed) their messaging app and their keyboard, then they've really eliminated a lot of potential complaints if a less tech-savvy crowd ends up buying future Motorolas.

HybridStatAnim8 2 hours ago

GrapheneOS has made a big push to hire a bunch of experienced, talented app devs, and they have been slowly chipping away at Messaging for a few months. They now have the resources to take on the AOSP apps and resume with the GrapheneOS apps. The rest of the AOSP apps are also planned to be overhauled.

They also plan to eventually support RCS in the Messaging app.

mmooss an hour ago

> GrapheneOS has made a big push to hire a bunch of experienced, talented app devs

That's great. How can a FOSS project afford that? Where does GOS money come from? Did Daniel win the lottery?

microtonal 7 hours ago

A bunch of the AOSP apps feel like you have to rewrite them for modern standards now and then you can basically have them in maintenance mode for years. The AOSP messaging app has also lasted for 15+ (?) years and has basically had no maintenance from Google for many years.

Modernizing these apps seems very high-impact. These are the very first things a new user sees and after the initial modernization, they should be relatively cheap to maintain.

subscribed 6 hours ago

> Messaging, high impact.

Messaging can be replaced with one of the hundreds decent messaging apps.

Unlike the backup app which is utterly unusable, untrustworthy and frankly crap. And CANNOT be replaced by anything else.

As it stands it's impossible to have reliable backups in GOS.

flexagoon 7 hours ago

I you look at the commits of the new Messages app it's mostly made by 2 people whose Github profiles show them as employees of GrapheneOS and who are mostly committing to different system apps. So I assume they have a separate team of devs whose job it is to make the system apps.

IIRC when they started first announced their replacement for the AOSP camera they said they hired a developer specifically for it.

beepbooptheory 4 hours ago

The biggest issue I have with the degoogled Androids is no RCS chats out of the box. At least for me, it stinks these days to not have it, and you're forced to do sneaky things to get it.

HybridStatAnim8 2 hours ago

GrapheneOS wants to eventually support RCS in the default chat app. It may take a lot of time for it to work without google components/google services but it is the eventual plan.

preisschild 7 hours ago

I had a scary bug on an older version where for months the contact names didnt match the actual senders/recipients. I have received SMS from my WISP under the same contact as Github MFA codes but also send mssages to relatives that never where received...

andrepd 6 hours ago

Seeing "Material 3/Material You" is a negative point for me, not a positive. It's almost comical just how atrocious the UI is. Yes let's make all phones 20% huge-er and all whitespace 40% wider, said no sane person ever.

qingcharles 4 hours ago

Design is so personal. I love Material 3 Expressive personally. Each to their own :)

HybridStatAnim8 2 hours ago

At least it is now consistent with the rest of the OSs UI.

tsunamifury 6 hours ago

It’s amazing that you don’t think any of this is based on real HCI.

People prefer larger tap targets on touch screens.

andrepd 5 hours ago

> People prefer larger tap targets on touch screens.

Only in a completely stupid, nonsensically A/B tested notion of "prefer". I'll refer you to this ~~excellent piece of satirical writing~~ actual post from Google design team: https://design.google/library/expressive-material-design-goo...

tsunamifury 4 hours ago

gib444 8 hours ago

Looks prettier but a shame an obvious regression happened for one of my primary use-cases: copying one-time codes. Long pressing on a link selects the entire SMS instead of bringing up a menu for the link. [0]

Makes me wonder about all the testing now

And the issue worded/tagged as a feature instead of a regression. Are the devs aware the feature existed before?

later:

It's doubly disappointing because just 4 days ago the project wrote [1], on using AI for the new Messaging app:

"it's also helping us raise our standards for our own work by pointing it at that to get extremely pedantic criticism catching many things we would miss...We've hired multiple experienced app developers who have spent months working on modernizing the Messaging app and carefully reviewing it"

[0] https://github.com/GrapheneOS/Messaging/issues/292

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49592770

HybridStatAnim8 2 hours ago

The notification the Messaging app produces should have the option to copy the one time code directly.

jasonvorhe 6 hours ago

You're using software from an alpha channel.

People sometimes.

gib444 6 hours ago

Alpha lowers the expected level of polish and stability - it doesn't make every regression equally acceptable. It is a reasonable criticism even when released to the alpha channel.

Further, I believe it's reasonable for users' expectations to be influenced by what the project itself communicates about the development process.

> People sometimes.

I have experienced many (relatively minor but some annoying) bugs in GrapheneOS the past few years, without complaint to the developers. And have submitted bug reports and logs. I'm "in the trenches", not just slinging mud from the outside. If I were in a better financial situation right now, I would be donating too.

getpokedagain 5 hours ago

microtonal 7 hours ago

It's doubly disappointing because just 4 days ago the project wrote [1], on using AI for the new Messaging app:

Why? Using an LLM as an additional reviewer seems like a good use of LLMs? Personally I have found LLMs very useful for that and they catch issues that other experienced programmers do not always find. It’s not like they are vibecoding a messages app.

mvdtnz 7 hours ago

What do you mean "why"? For the exact reason he stated in his first paragraph - a serious regression impacting his workflow.

kelnos 2 hours ago

gib444 7 hours ago

My comment makes it pretty clear what the disappointment is:

> shame an obvious regression happened for one of my primary use-cases: copying one-time codes

Then the "later" is that even with frontier AI review tools, it was still missed

I am not alleging vibe coding - that's a strawman.

mvdtnz 7 hours ago

Wake me up when I don't need to ship hundreds of dollars to Google to use this OS.

subscribed 6 hours ago

It's maybe $250 for someone's old phone.

Other than that -- next year. And this is other companies' choice, not GrapheneOS team, to fix on releasing grossly insecure hardware or NOT releasing patches and fixes.

edent 6 hours ago

Go down to literally any 2nd hand phone store and buy a refurb. None of your money will go to Google and you'll have your phone at a fraction of the new price.

noman-land 6 hours ago

Set your alarm for next year when you can ship hundreds of dollars to Motorola.

jasonvorhe 6 hours ago

Set an alarm for the typical Motorola flagship schedule then.

mrd3v0 7 hours ago

So..next year?