PipePipe: NewPipe hard fork implementing SponsorBlock (github.com)
270 points by Qision a day ago
londons_explore 2 hours ago
I want these things to implement peer to peer caching, so that when 10 people are watching the same video, only one downloads from youtubes own servers.
Then it's just a matter of letting people add their own videos directly to the service and it can become fully independent of YouTube.
adrianmonk an hour ago
Delivering the bits is not the hard part of making a successful video platform. It's other stuff like recommendations and content discovery that is actually useful, allowing creators to monetize enough that they want to be on your platform, navigating legal issues, fighting spam and abuse, and getting enough users to sign up and start using your service.
idrios an hour ago
Delivering the bits is a part of it though. When youtube changes its api in a way that forces NewPipe to change its algorithm, they have to push out a change that forces users to update the app. This is annoying because naturally you won't find NewPipe on the app store so updating the app is tedious for users who use it. The parent's workaround fixes some or all of this nuisance, depending on how implemented
maybewhenthesun 25 minutes ago
Delivering the bits might not be hard. Storing the bits is hard. Or at least expensive.
t2r3121 an hour ago
Peer to peer died because (1) a lot of the world, especially outside the US, has terrible upload/bandwidth, (2) HTTPS CDNs got _really_ cheap, far cheaper that p2p technologies like BitTorrent+WebSeed.
There are a minority of users who care about being able to host videos that violate YouTube/TikTok/Instagram policies. Unfortunately, a significant part of that minority is working with infringing or illegal content, which both prevents ad networks from working with you and attracts attention from law enforcement.
prmoustache 2 hours ago
That would put users at risk of being sued/punished for copyright infrigement.
mayli 10 minutes ago
Pretty much worse user experience guaranteed, plz no.
transitivebs an hour ago
this is exactly why i worked on webtorrent ~13 years ago https://github.com/webtorrent/webtorrent
szolonh 2 hours ago
there exist distributed alternatives like joinpeertube.org but they never really take off. Consumers like centralization, look at twitter.
Aachen an hour ago
I tried using Peertube but finding an instance whose content policy fits what you're meaning to upload and responds to sign-up requests isn't trivial. It's basically perpetual storage they're offering for free so I get it, maybe the real surprise is that youtube makes so much money off of us that they can afford this
Found one in the end when I didn't have a choice anymore and put renewed effort into it (Google's algorithm won't let me into my account anymore, saying they don't have enough information to verify it's me (username, password, recovery email.. not enough apparently, but there is nothing else), so I'm a Peertube exclusive now) but iirc I can't use it for everything, like if I wanted to upload something in Dutch I'd have to find a new server that allows my language
KolmogorovComp 2 hours ago
yes, will you also be providing the caching server? Because that's the main blocker I think, nobody has the resources to cache them.
RockRobotRock 19 minutes ago
I honestly don't see how those two things are related.
MisterMunchkin 2 hours ago
The problem with P2P video is that it's expensive to host and most of the people using it are going to use it for child abuse. It makes it not realistic.
kitchi an hour ago
> most of the people using it are going to use it for child abuse.
This is deeply unsubstantiated and does not help contribute to a constructive debate. Please consider thinking more carefully.
api an hour ago
AlbertoLuna 2 hours ago
After trying all the alternatives in the end I settled on self hosting https://github.com/Materialious/Materialious
All the YouTube alternative frontends are so privacy focused that they do not even offer video history in your account.
Having video history is a must for me as I might start watching a video in my computer and then continue on my phone.
Also as it is just a web (and includes support for SponsorBlock) it works everywhere, no need to patch apps or install extensions.
Lerc 15 minutes ago
Is it a problem for you that YouTube's watch history is littered with videos you didn't watch, but got recorded as being watched because the mouse pointer moved over one of their suggestions for a moment.
Aachen an hour ago
I have watch history in NewPipe just fine? And I find it very convenient to know what I've already watched. All local, Google doesn't need to store it for you / you can't lose access to it
jurf an hour ago
I think OP meant cross-device.
gchamonlive 6 hours ago
Used through all of the apps and personally there's little incentive for me not to use Firefox/Fennec. The only issue is that background playing is flaky, not sure it only works on my Poco F7 and not my S23, or if it randomly starts pausing the video when leaving de browser or even if it's a browser or OS power saving settings. But when it works it works flawlessly.
In any case, there needs to be a huge problem to justify installing an android app. I prefer to keep them to a minimum and focus solely on the browser. Browsers are the only OS-vendor-safe option which I can use to bail entirely on Google's Android or iOS and go some place else.
TFNA 4 hours ago
NewPipe has a one-click download button. If one follows channels with mainly-audio content that one may want to listen to later, possibly away from an internet connection, that is super-handy.
NewPipe also lets you export your subscriptions (which is just a bunch of links to RSS feeds), so you aren't shackled to Android/RSS.
wafflemaker 2 hours ago
It's even better with a podcast app that can have a directory read as a podcast. Have to click once more though to have the"podcasts"refreshed to get it in my playlist. Still cool for podcasts that are only on YouTube and Spotify.
gchamonlive 4 hours ago
Can I somehow import my current subscriptions from Google into newpipe? When I tried newpipe what put me off was that I already had a list on the browser. I also couldn't sync the list between multiple devices. Also is there anything on Linux I can use to sync to newpipe and resume videos on my laptop if I'm tired of watching on my phone? Of if I saw something interest and I wanted to continue on Linux in order to take notes and make proofs of concept.
TFNA 4 hours ago
braiamp 2 hours ago
shellwizard 4 hours ago
Also newpipe let you create a playlist of videos and only play the audio track in the background or play a given video in the background
mawadev 3 hours ago
Solid take, these days most apps are just glorified browser wrappers and you don't miss out on anything. In fact, you could have a separate browser with all these saving modes disabled just for the youtube use case.
II2II 5 hours ago
One of the reasons why I use an app to view YouTube is to disable suggested videos and comments. Basically, I want to have a personalized list of the channels I view as worth watching and I want to discourage continued watching outside of those boundaries.
Groxx 5 hours ago
There are adblock filters and extensions for that fwiw.
YouTube does make some kind of changes significantly harder to build than simple scripting will handle though. I do definitely see some reasons for specialized apps, and video is a fairly prime example of where they're often more capable or more (power/time/whatever) efficient.
gchamonlive 5 hours ago
I don't have a problem with compulsive watching, so for me the subscriptions view is good enough. I think there are be extensions for Firefox to customize the layout the way need, but it falls in the pitfall of relying on YouTube code for it to work, so it's bound to be flaky or have a short lifespan.
II2II 5 hours ago
crtasm 5 hours ago
I use NewPipe so I can subscribe to channels and put channels/videos into playlists, without needing to make a youtube account.
gchamonlive 5 hours ago
I use android so I'm already past that point sadly, but I'd be the first to dump my Google credentials as soon as that monopoly that's got a stranglehold on Android cracks
crtasm 3 hours ago
CarlJW an hour ago
Have you tried the Firefox extension "Video Background Play Fix"?
This has worked flawlessly for me on every phone I've used.
Latty 3 hours ago
Have you tried disabling the Page Visibility API? Web apps will sometimes use that to try and mess with background playing, IIRC.
gchamonlive 3 hours ago
Wasn't aware of this API tbh, will take a look thanks!
thuruv 2 hours ago
agreeable argument. I am also running towards firefox, but keeping the firefox open, juggling between the tabs, especially the quirks YT poses on Firefox, these apps poses a usecase. Yes, download/subscribe/SB support etc. Currently using libretube mostly.
gchamonlive 2 hours ago
I'm with you here, it's a degraded user experience running stuff on mobile browser, intentionally so I'd risk saying. Best of both worlds would be to have an android app but it's just a webserver I connect using the browser, you know, like we've always done in linux haha, this way we could have newpipe-like apps targeting the browser running locally.
but for some reason google knows better and there is no efficient way to run local containerized web services.
dataflow 3 hours ago
> Used through all of the apps and personally there's little incentive for me not to use Firefox/Fennec.
Your comment made me try Firefox for the Nth time right now.
And the rendering is still bad like I remembered it. Download the image locally and open it in an image viewer so you actually view the pixels 1:1, then see if you can tell which one is Firefox (I can): https://imgur.com/a/FsXuoa3
I'm staying with Chrome.
aktenlage 2 hours ago
It always hurts me, when people basically say "I'm not giving up [something that has cornered the market] for the alternative, because [minor-grievance]", even though it is already clear that the monopoly is being exploited to make things worse for all customers.
dataflow 2 hours ago
chrisweekly 2 hours ago
Related tangent: Brave is pretty close to Chrome, sans Google.
dataflow 2 hours ago
Tha_14 6 hours ago
I have been happily using PipePipe for the past few months and have been very satisfied with it. The developer seems to spend the time and attention needed to make it work again whenever youtube likes to change things and I really appreciate that.
y-c-o-m-b 6 hours ago
I think it's been about 6 months or more for me and I am also very satisfied with it. I left NewPipe because I'd often have to wait days to weeks for simple fixes to get implemented. PipePipe is patched very often.
simur 3 hours ago
I think part of the reason why NewPipe is so slow is that they are in the middle of a rewrite/redesign. All the focus is there and the current app is in the maintainance mode.
riedel 2 hours ago
This is the reason I switched probably mor than a year or two ago. YouTube remains a cat and mouse game. Strange things with those forks is that they always add some more streaming sources Mike BkliBili but keep the old stuft. Actually soundcloud only works very limited lately.
sureglymop 5 hours ago
Same. My only issue (with NewPipe also) is that at ~50 subscribed channels, Google rate limits me when I refresh. I wish there was better logic to get new content or a way to space it out over an amount of time.
2Gkashmiri 5 hours ago
I am at 340+ subs and rate limits happen very rarely.
I have had this issue few times on a specific wifi router (different router on same line doesn't) so don't know exactly.
hadrien01 6 hours ago
Same. It's also less buggy, and they've fixed long-standing navigation gripes I had with NewPipe. I did disable the SponsorBlock integration because I find it quite annoying to go back on a skipped sequence.
herunan 43 minutes ago
token controverial comment that all good stuff needs to be sustained with money somehow. always good to find alternatives if/when/for can't afford/appreciate. but there has to be sustenance. nothing against a cheeky freeride, of course. but when it becomes the main source something has to give.
bigyabai 4 minutes ago
No (realistic) amount of money can protect an app like this from Alphabet. It's their service, and clients like NewPipe are always at risk of being depreciated forever.
Cider9986 4 hours ago
If you want music I've found Metrolist to be the nicest frontend.
creatonez an hour ago
Just a heads up, this includes support for Return YouTube Dislike, which tells a third party service what videos you click on and has no measures to ensure anonymity like SponsorBlock does. The option for disabling it doesn't seem to do anything.
TechSquidTV an hour ago
Fundamentally against stealing from creators.
flexagoon 7 minutes ago
How is blocking in-video apps stealing from creators? If the advertiser pays them per view, your view still counts. If they pay a commission per purchase, it doesn't matter if you skipped the ad if you wouldn't have bought the product anyway, and I doubt you buy every single advertised products to support creators.
aucisson_masque 22 minutes ago
You’re free to put ads and I’m free to not watch them. What the issue ?
porjo an hour ago
I respect your stance. A couple counter points from personal experience: even if I can't skip the ads, I'm not paying attention - I immediately mute/tune out. And the ads are typically so obnoxious that the reflex to ignore/avoid is only magnified. Is that so different from having a mechanism to auto skip/mute?
kqgnkqgn 37 minutes ago
Posting YouTube videos can just be a hobby - it was in the beginning, and that was fine. It's OK if posting a video isn't a profitable career path. Enthusiasts > "creators".
And in-video ads like these are even less defensible given that they still show up when people are paying YouTube (and creators by extension) to not display ads.
stavros 20 minutes ago
Out of the options "creators released content only behind paywalls", "users steal from creators", and "creators incentivised platforms to lobby to remove user freedom so users can't steal from creators", what actually happened was, by far, my least preferable option.
tancop 5 hours ago
I just use ReVanced. I like shorts and recommendations and don't really care about privacy when most of my feed is football highlights, K&P sketches, gaming channels and random bullshit comedy videos. But having a full open source alternative is still important.
s0ss 5 hours ago
Why don’t you care about privacy specifically in this context?
exe34 5 hours ago
He thinks privacy is for dodgy things.
bobsmooth 4 hours ago
Because the algo, despite everyone's objections, is pretty good at recommending videos.
eventualcomp 3 hours ago
pjc50 4 hours ago
s0ss 3 hours ago
Toynbeeidea 3 hours ago
Oh? I recently stopped using revanced when updates stopped and my older revanced stopped working correctly. Is it back?
flexagoon 5 minutes ago
Morphe is the new app made by the old Revanced developers
kamiheku 3 hours ago
Morphe [1] seems to be the one carrying the torch.
bdcp 17 minutes ago
you gotta repatch every 4~6 months, its always breaking due to yt changes
almostroot an hour ago
https://github.com/revanced Download the latest revanced manager and it works fine. I've had no issues but the account I use is on a friend's family YouTube Premium plan so I don't need to rely on the ad blocker.
pbmonster 2 hours ago
Does it auto-update now? I like its UI better than PipePipe, but I got so sick of hand-updating Vanced (including hand-downloading the correct apk and waiting several minutes for the patches to run against it) every time Google breaks Youtube again. There was a period of Warfare last year where Google would make breaking changes more than once a week...
PipePipe is so nice with the fast auto-updates. If I ever even catch it breaking, I just have to use Firefox for a few hours and then F-Droid ships the fix and PipePipe works again.
looperhacks 2 hours ago
It doesn't, sadly. The new kid on the block, Morphe (there was some classic open source drama) directly gives you the link to the correct apkmirror page, don't know if revanced also did this. But it makes things easier. Tbh, I only update every few months, it's bearable
satvikpendem 5 hours ago
Why use this over Morphe? You can download from Morphe and it'll skip sponsorship segments too as they all use yt-dlp underneath.
sunaookami 4 hours ago
Morphe just patches the YouTube app no? Then you need to still use that abomination. NewPipe/PipePipe is fast, lightweight and I couldn't care less about any "features" other than watching a video.
k4rli an hour ago
Morphe/revanced with good configuration makes the official app super nice. Swipe controls, full OLED, no shorts, Sponsorblock.
Default app for sure is an abomination and so are most Androids straight out of the box before debloat + clean rom + root.
almostroot an hour ago
What's the benefit of Morphe over Revanced? I've been using Vanced or Revanced for years, but I'm willing to change.
Bad name though, first few results for "Morphe" is a well-known make-up brand.
ciefa an hour ago
Nowadays I use Morphe for Youtube and Reddit. Seal Plus for downloading and VLC to play downloaded videos.
NewPipe was so buggy for me in the past, I've avoided it. Did it get better? Any reason to use it over Morphe?
aembleton 2 hours ago
I've been using Tubular which was a NewPipe fork that implemented SponsorBlock. Works really well, and I was going to see what the differences are. Just noticed, now that Tubular is no longer maintained.
I'll move over to PipePipe now.
flexagoon 4 minutes ago
> Just noticed, now that Tubular is no longer maintained
How have you just noticed that when Tubular reliably broke every single month when YouTube changes something and you had to wait for weeks for it to be fixed? It was barely maintained for a long time now
QGQBGdeZREunxLe an hour ago
Still no good solution for Apple TV? Running SponsorBlock container, on the same network appears to be the best solution but that only mutes ads and skips them when permitted.
elashri 4 hours ago
This app and previously NewPipe is the main thing I miss after moving to iOS. I really can't stand ads (including organic ads that SponsorBlock deal with).
nrabulinski 3 hours ago
I’m using https://github.com/Tonwalter888/YouMod on my iPhone and I’m very satisfied. It has integrated adblock, sponsorblock, and despite being modded stock YouTube app it has tons of features, like completely removing shorts from the app, customizing the UI, and more.
nntwozz 4 hours ago
Get https://github.com/yattee/yattee
I've been watching youtube without ads on all Apple hardware for years.
I use invidious as backend.
https://github.com/iv-org/invidious
Absolutely fabulous.
flopbob 3 hours ago
i had a look at yattee, but it looks like there is only the possibility to sideload it to ios devices, which you would have to do every 7 days, or am I missing something? The repos is unfortunately very sparse with installation instructions
flexagoon 2 minutes ago
nntwozz 3 hours ago
crazybonkersai 2 hours ago
Connect to VPN in Albania and you will get ad free YouTube experience. You are welcome.
noman-land 15 minutes ago
Why?
microflash 4 hours ago
Although not a direct equivalent, but check out Unwatched [1].
suprfnk 4 hours ago
Yep, it’s pretty much the reason I don’t use Youtube on my iPhone almost at all.
It’s probably a good thing, actually.
olexsmir 5 hours ago
Been using pipepiple since December of last year, very happy about the app. The developer seems to care about the project and introduces a lot of quality of life improvments.
nh2 4 hours ago
> Set a sleep timer for bedtime listening
Killer feature!
globular-toast 7 hours ago
I was curious why NewPipe didn't implement SponsorBlock. Is there a story behind why it doesn't? The repo hints at "differences" but isn't specific.
dev_hugepages 6 hours ago
From https://newpipe.net/blog/pinned/newpipe-and-online-advertisi...:
> In summary, it can be said that sponsoring is a good approach. It is fair and non-discriminating to all users, preserves their privacy, lets creators select their partners themselves, and provides them with a larger share of the revenue. Even though there are some disadvantages, it is more or less beneficial for all sides. [...] Ethical advertising, for example through sponsorship, should therefore not be touched by us. This would turn our key selling proposition from being privacy-friendly to being a gatekeeper for advertising. And this is not what NewPipe ever has been or wants to be. We’ve always stressed that NewPipe’s main goal is to protect the users by maintaining their privacy, not to, e.g., provide features a user would otherwise have to pay for, for free. Regarding SponsorBlock: after a lot of discussion within the team, we decided not to support this system. As stated earlier, we don’t consider advertising in general problematic. It’s the unethical, privacy-invasive systems that are very common today which we consider evil. Sponsorship provides a mostly ethical way of advertising.
ndriscoll 6 hours ago
> Thus, employing a system to bypass those ads is harmful to those creators.
There's an obvious catch-22 here: either you are maintaining privacy, and the sponsor has no way to know whether their segment was viewed, so you are wasting your life watching an ad to make an inanimate object happy, or they are spying on you to learn whether you watch it.
Either way I fundamentally disagree with them on the idea that push advertising is ethical in the first place, but it's kind of absurd thinking about people feeling good about themselves for watching a recording. Like did you also not fast-forward your VCR through ads in those days and instead dutifully watch attentively lest God know you were naughty? You make sure to read all of the spam in your mail, or inserts in newspapers rather than chucking them in the bin?
II2II 5 hours ago
duskdozer 6 hours ago
einsteinx2 6 hours ago
> As stated earlier, we don’t consider advertising in general problematic. It’s the unethical, privacy-invasive systems that are very common today which we consider evil. Sponsorship provides a mostly ethical way of advertising.
Considering the fact that the vast majority of YouTube sponsors seem to be some kind of scam or are privacy-invasive themselves, the word “mostly” is doing a lot of heavy lifting there.
satvikpendem 5 hours ago
They circumvent YouTube ads but draw a line at in video ads? Their stance is inconsistent, not to also mention that lots of sponsorship ads can be unethical (see the outrage over BetterHelp) while normal YouTube ads don't have to be unethical.
miladyincontrol 5 hours ago
TomasEkeli 6 hours ago
Fair opinion. Also fair to fork when one does not agree. This is how the system is supposed to work.
mzajc 6 hours ago
They wrote about it here: https://newpipe.net/blog/pinned/newpipe-and-online-advertisi...
m12k 5 hours ago
Anyone know how PipePipe compares to SmartTube? I recently got a Google TV, and I’m looking for the best alternative YouTube viewer.
JMiao 6 hours ago
is there an equivalent experience for desktop pcs?
UnlockedSecrets 6 hours ago
Firefox with sponsorblock installed and ublock origin?
duskdozer 6 hours ago
I haven't been able to watch youtube in the browser for ages. I get like one 10-20s chunk then nothing further. Do you use just the standard block lists?
TomasEkeli 6 hours ago
mystifyingpoi 3 hours ago
piaste 6 hours ago
tosti 4 hours ago
dddw 3 hours ago
Freetube is pretty great, also you can import your newpipe subs. Http://Freetubeapp.io
kilroy123 3 hours ago
Shameless promotion here but I think https://channelsurfer.tv is a good experience.
Flere-Imsaho 3 hours ago
Brave browser.
I'm not sure about transferring subscriptions between Pipe and Brave...?
emaro 2 hours ago
Grayjay I'd say. Also works great on Android.
Gander5739 4 hours ago
It's not that well known, but mpv supports playing youtube videos. I think you need yt-dlp installed.
duskdozer 6 hours ago
Freetube if it's still working? I haven't tried it in a while.
TomasEkeli 6 hours ago
It's working again.
TiredOfLife 6 hours ago
Chrome with sponsorblock and ublock origin lite
F3nd0 3 hours ago
Why settle for lite?
vachina 5 hours ago
Reject Chromium, accept Firefox
trallnag 6 hours ago
From time to time I get blocked by YouTube and both NewPipe and PipePipe become unusable. I wonder if it has something to do with my internet provider putting me behind a CGNAT proxy
novaRom 3 hours ago
Yes, it happens quite often recently. I think, their approach is "dominate and tolerate" in a controllable way, so they know quite a bit about who is actually using NewPipe, yt-dlp, etc. and they tolerate it in order to have a kind of leverage to preserve their monopoly. Then if number of out-of-official-app views becomes like above certain point, they aggressively block with "bot detected" message.
faust201 4 hours ago
totally...
Funnily what I found was to install 1.1.1.1 from cloudflare. Enable that. PipePipe works perfectly.
jgbuddy 6 hours ago
Crazy name
BaardFigur 16 minutes ago
Chinese developer. I'd love to see Tubular be revived