Hacker News

> It is somewhat confusing to me that more countries don't treat Meta as a political threat

Lobbying and bribes aren't confusing

Well that sucks then: https://polymarket.com/event/brazil-presidential-election

80% chance Bolsonaro wins.

brazilians are extremely poor, even with the programmes that try to masquerade the numbers.

why would they care about the amazon if they barely have any money?

climate pov is a first world luxury. no one serious about this election would even attempt to make.

I wouldn't attribute an eventual Lula defeat to this, however.

His 3rd term was terrible, dozens of new taxes were implemented, living costs rose, purchasing power declined, and it became obvious that he was governing through the supreme court. His campaign was overconfident and taken completely off guard when they got utterly eviscerated in the 1st round of elections earlier this month. Left wing desperation was palpable.

Partidarian judges and journalists did everything they could to help Lula, but after the presidential debates on live television, it's pretty much over. There's just no way this guy is even fit to lead the nation ever again.

To save others a couple clicks:

> [Auto-Translated] The Sleeping Giants Brazil report analyzes 300 Reels of 30 Instagram profiles to investigate evidence of algorithmic favoring to federal deputy Nikolas Ferreira (PL-MG). Its ten videos totaled 410.5 million views, nearly three times the total of the 90 videos of the other nine MPs analyzed. In views by follower, its performance was 17.2 times the typical value of these deputies, 29.3 times that of the largest Brazilian profiles and 33.7 times that of the largest profiles in the world. His average viewing was behind only Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi, surpassing celebrities such as Selena Gomez, Beyoncé and Justin Bieber. The study documents a persistent disparity that requires more transparency from the Meta, although public data does not allow it to determine its causes.

Both sides are pulling record levels of engagement. It's a colosseum out there. But yes, one of the sides is more automated as usual. Most of the left engagement is human driven.

Looks at least partially organic to me, the guy is very cute and looking at his youtube video it is full of female commenters and has 2.7m subscribers.

So he is a celebrity and not just a politician, probably a lot of women are in love with him.

More people should be aware of the Buddhist precept of “right livelihood”.

I do believe the US interference in flipping most of latin america to the right the last few years reached levels we haven't seen in decades and the magnitude of the machinery behind that is something we have never seen before. Trump surely got quite a few puppet governments with the likes of Milei, Noboa, here with the incredibly corrupt de la espriella and now Brazil in the verge to have another Bolsonaro.

I suspect this has been part of 4chan’s lasting appeal: a dead simple algorithm that can be independently verified via timestamps.

I would go further and make them liable for what they show. Sure it's user created content. But the feed is entirely curated by them. They decide what to show and what not and they should be liable as such.

The US government is not a fan of other sovereign nations (even Western-aligned ones) from gaining "algorithmic sovereignty", as was seen when Australia tried to do so recently and received a stern threat from the US State Department.

X did publish their algorithms.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310291

They set the standard in transparency.

I don't think anything will force them to do this. Can you elaborate on why you think they'll be forced to do this?

Algorithms are something we should definitely regulate, as a generalization of social media and Ai decisions over human lives.

I'd like to see something like ATProtocol feeds forced upon these companies, anyone can create any kind of feed, it works in all clients.

Apologies! Fixed the title now

The Brazilian left has done much worse than whatever it is that Meta is doing.

> We have defeated Bolsonarism!

Luís Roberto Barroso, former Brazilian Supreme Court Justice.

Whoopsie! A slight technical error that aligns with the politics of the White House, it's wild how that happens from time to time to time to time...

Facebook has also made content decisions that have hurt right wing interests in the past, such as in 2020 when they banned several accounts affiliated with Bolsonaro

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/facebook-suspends-disi...

They also repeatedly suspended Dutch LGBTQIA+ accounts:

https://nltimes.nl/2026/04/23/meta-suspends-dozens-dutch-lgb...

It's time countries started suspending Facebook/Instagram for meddling in national affairs.

No, the last thing US Democrats need is to squander their time on endless questioning.

Some of that is going to be inevitable for impeachment and conviction of course, which are most certainly necessary for traitor Grump and his Supreme Council justifiers as well.

But as for this issue? Strike the root, don't get bogged down in endless bickering about how power was probably abused. Rather, put an end to the capabilities being available to abuse to begin with. Imagine a US GDPR, along with anti-trust legislation/enforcement that un-ties Faceboot-the-app from Faceboot-the-hosting-service, mandating open APIs that facilitate vibrant competition in both markets.

For flexing muscles and advancing U.S. foreign policy goals abroad? Doubt it.

No, it's the lawnmower analogy again: Zuckerberg has no political views, he just thinks that Trump will restrict him less/allow him to make more money/is easier to exploit.

It would absolutely strike me as a Trump thing, yes. We have a habit of mirroring the US, and it shows

I think it's more that they happen to be aligned. Left-wing parties are more likely to tax and regulate Meta than radical right parties. So it's for their own profit. But Trump is also mostly there for enriching the oligarchy, he often has the same priorities.

Facebook always aligns with the right wing no matter if the white house is left wing or right wing.

Possibly. All things point to Bolsonaro's son winning the election today. He's a Trump ally.

If the Brazilian right wins, then it will mean that not a single left wing party has won an election in South America since the end of USAID.

Are you claiming that Al Jazeera fabricated this report?

How is it good that companies in the US is interfering with elections in other countries? Seems like a bizarre take.

Are you one of the guys that support the pedophile Trump and believe everything he says to he gospel?

By which frame of comparison do you say they were ever "damned even though they didn't"?