Hacker News

by Ryan Harman

Adding Window Functions to a Spreadsheet (getgrist.com)

16 points by reedciccio an hour ago

seemaze a minute ago

Imagine a world where we starting teaching SQL in primary school..

librasteve 7 minutes ago

I’m all in favour of making spreadsheets better, with code friendly formulas. Here’s one I’m working on - somewhat earlier in dev cycle than grist and while I did consider Python (and lua) for the formula DSL decided to cook up my own.

All feedback good and back v welcome.

https://omasheet.org

shevy-java 37 minutes ago

The syntax is so archaic ... it really is anything but a thing of beauty.

    prev_balance = PREVIOUS(rec, order_by="Date").Running_Balance or 0
    prev_balance + $Amount
It's such a strange mix-up of stuff. PREVIOUS() is a macro or looks like one, right? But it is a function call assumingly. But then what's with .Running_Balance? Guess that also ties into a function. But why use different syntax for essentially the same thing? It seems rather weird to write code like that. What would the python variant be like? Or a DSL?

The syntax strangeness continues:

    rates = Rates.lookupRecords(Person=$Person, order_by="Rate_Start")
    rates.find.le($Date).Hourly_Rate
Does that really convey most easily what is wanted? It seems needlessly verbose. Why would it require both $Person and $Date? Should that not be easier to figure out in its own right? Is that efficient?

People need to remember that mentally, unless they use AI.

whizzter 29 minutes ago

I think it's an push in Spreadsheets to become more "DB-alike" for less arbitrary results (like in the problem example the article starts out with) but kind-of misguided since it's complicated to do "easy things".

The root issue is that there's almost 50 years of spreadsheet syntax to consider and not colliding with.

paulfitz 31 minutes ago

It is straight Python. Yes the spreadsheet habit of making functions SHOUT does look weird mixed in with Python syntax.

PREVIOUS returns a record, then .Running_Balance pulls out one field of it.

chii 24 minutes ago

That's what makes it clunky. Returning a record is OK, but then a record is basically what spreadsheets are (ala, a table). Except records are named columns in a spreadsheet, and accessing it using a dot syntax looks out of place imho.

I reckon it makes more sense to return a table, and then have an index lookup in that table: e.g., index(PREVIOUS(blah_blah), column). Then you can also use an indirection to choose which column from another cell if desired.

This is how google finance in sheets returns some data (like exchange rates, iirc).

whizzter 28 minutes ago

What parts are Python and how does one know where the classic Spreadsheet functionality ends and Python starts ?

librasteve a few seconds ago